Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 211–229

The Australian merger guidelines: A comparison with the U.S. merger guidelines

  • David K. Round
  • Richard A. Miller
Article

DOI: 10.1007/BF01034179

Cite this article as:
Round, D.K. & Miller, R.A. Rev Ind Organ (1993) 8: 211. doi:10.1007/BF01034179
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Modern Australian antitrust had not begun when the first U.S. merger guidelines appeared in 1968. Even now, twenty five years later, no similarly detailed, formal administrative guidelines have been developed in Australia. This paper reviews the way in which the AustralianTrade Practices Act 1974 handles mergers and market definition, and considers how the Courts and the Trade Practices Commission, Australia's sole antitrust enforcement agency, have handled market definition and evaluated mergers. The key role played by the Trade Practices Tribunal, a quasi-judicial body, in influencing the Australian approach to mergers and market definition is highlighted. Contrasts are made with the 1992 American guidelines, and reasons for the different approaches are suggested.

Key words

Mergers merger guidelines market definition demand substitution geographic boundaries potential suppliers barriers to entry market share Herfindahl Hirschman Index 

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • David K. Round
    • 1
  • Richard A. Miller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsWesleyan UniversityMiddletownUSA