Fact or artifact revisited: Survey instrument effects and pocketbook politics
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Sears and Lau (1983) presented evidence that apparent self-interest effects can be, and have been, generated in political surveys by question order artifacts. This evidence was based in part on a tabulation of published reports of self-interest effects in the NES series, specifically on the political effects of personal financial situation. From another analysis of the NES data, Lewis-Beck (1985) concluded, to the contrary, that personal finances have in fact had a consistent effect on voting preferences, without significant contamination from such artifacts. We here argue that his analysis inappropriately defines the conditions for possible contamination. We first lay out a theory of when such contamination effects might occur. We then repeat our analysis, taking into consideration both his observations and our own reappraisal of our procedures. We obtain results consistent with our original position, although the results are confounded by different types of questions appearing disproportionately in contaminated and uncontaminated conditions. However, the 1984 election appears to be a special case, in which self-interest effects were strong and relatively uncontaminated. We then report a split ballot experiment that is not confounded by item content, and find results consistent with our original position. However this methodological debate may be resolved, on the larger question of whether people's economic self-interest has major political implications, the evidence seems clear. In cases not contaminated by item order, which we would take to be the most appropriate test of self-interest effects, personal finances have on the average had only a small effect on political responses.
- Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R. W., and Tuchfarber, A. (1984). What must my interest in politics be if I just told you “I don't know”?Political Opinion Quarter 48: 510–519.
- Brody, R. A., and Sniderman, P. M. (1977). From life space to polling place: The relevance of personal concerns for voting behavior.British Journal of Political Science 7: 337–360.
- Feldman, S. (1984). Economic self-interest and the vote: Evidence and meaning.Political Behavior 6: 229–252.
- Fiorina, M. P. (1981).Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Green, D. P. (1988).Self-interest, public opinion, and mass political behavior. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
- Kinder, D. R., and Kiewiet, D. R. (1979). Economic discontent and political behavior: The role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional voting.American Journal of Political Science 23: 495–527.
- Kinder, D. R., and Kiewiet, D. R. (1981). Sociotropic politics: The American case.British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–161.
- Kinder, D. R., and Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 414–431.
- Kinder, D. R., and Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.),The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. II, 3rd ed., pp. 659–741, New York: Random House.
- Kuklinski, J. H., and West, D. M. (1981). Economic expectations and voting behavior in United States House and Senate elections.American Political Science Review 75: 436–447.
- Lau, R. R. (in press). Political motivation and political cognition. In R. Sorrentino and E. T. Higgins (eds.),Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundation of Social Behavior, vol. 2. New York: Guilford.
- Lau, R. R., and Sears, D. O. (1981). Cognitive links between economic grievances and political responses.Political Behavior, 3, 279–302.
- Lau, R. R., Sears, D. O., and Jessor, T. (1989). Survey instrument effects and pocketbook politics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
- Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1985). Pocketbook voting in U.S. national election studies: Fact or artifact?American Journal of Political Science 29: 348–356.
- Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1986). Comparative economic voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy.American Journal of Political Science 30: 315–346.
- Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1988).Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
- Miller, A. H., and Wattenberg, M. P. (1985). Throwing the rascals out: Policy and performance evaluations of presidential candidates, 1952–1980.American Political Science Review 79: 359–372.
- Schuman, H., Kalton, G., and Ludwig, J. (1983). Context and contiguity in survey questionnaires.Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 112–115.
- Schuman, H., and Presser, S. (1981).Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.
- Sears, D. O., and Allen, H. M., Jr. (1984). The trajectory of local desegregation controversies and whites' opposition to busing. In N. Miller and M. B. Brewer (eds.),Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation (pp. 123–151). New York: Academic Press.
- Sears, D. O., and Citrin, J. (1985).Tax Revolt: Something for Nothing in California (enlarged edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Sears, D. O., and Funk, C. L. (1990). Self-interest in Americans political opinions. In J.J. Mansbridge (ed.), Beyond Self-interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Sears, D. O., and Jessor, T. (1981). Mob-like behavior by the mass electorate: The case of Proposition 13. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.
- Sears, D. O., and Lau, R. R. (1979). Personal impact, governmental performance, and policy attitudes: A preliminary analysis of the 1979 CPS Study. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
- Sears, D. O., and Lau, R. R. (1983). Inducing apparently self-interested political preferences.American Journal of Political Science 27: 223–252.
- Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R. Tyler, T., R., and Allen, H. M., Jr. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting.American Political Science Review 74: 670–684.
- Shanks, J. M., and Miller, W. E. (1985). Policy direction and performance evaluation: Complimentary explanations of the Reagan elections. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.
- Turner, C. F., and Martin, E. (eds.) (1984).Surveying Subjective Phenomena, vol. 1. New York: Russell Sage.
- Fact or artifact revisited: Survey instrument effects and pocketbook politics
Volume 12, Issue 3 , pp 217-242
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links