Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Karyotype analysis and heterochromatin differentiation with Giemsa C-banding and fluorescent counterstaining inCephalanthera (Orchidaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detailed studies of the chromosomes of the three Austrian species of the genusCephalanthera showed them all to have basically similar karyotypes. BothC. damasonium (2n = 36) andC. longifolia (2n = 32) have three large and several classes of smaller chromosome pairs. The karyotype ofC. rubra (2n = 44) is composed of four large and several groups of smaller pairs. The heterochromatin in these species amounts to about 10% of total karyotype length. All the chromosomes have Giemsa-positive centromeres, but only a few have intercalary or terminal bands. Using differential fluorescent staining with DAPI/actinomycin D, quinacrine/actinomycin D (both A-T specific), and chromomycin A3/distamycin A (G-C specific) three different types of major heterochromatic bands can be characterized in respect of their satellite DNA composition: highly A-T rich, slightly A-T rich, and very G-C rich. The chromosomes ofC. longifolia contain more A-T rich C-bands than those ofC. damasonium, while the latter's have more G-C rich heterochromatin. In both species several C-bands appear as secondary constrictions or gaps in the Feulgen-stained chromosomes, but most likely, in each species there is only one pair of chromosomes where the secondary constrictions function as nucleolus organizing regions. No major intraspecific variation could be observed except on one small chromosome pair ofC. longifolia which had a heteromorphic C-band in most individuals. Possible pathways of karyotype evolution involving polyploidy and Robertsonian events are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afzelius, K., 1943: Zytologische Beobachtungen an einigen Orchidaceen. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr.37 (3), 266–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, H. N., 1942: The pollen-grain division in theOrchidaceae. — J. Genet. Cambridge43, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deumling, B., Greilhuber, J., 1982: Characterization of heterochromatin in different species of theScilla siberica group (Liliaceae) by in situ hybridization of satellite DNAs and fluorochrome banding. — Chromosoma (Berl.)84, 535–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, R. B., Bedbrook, J., Jones, J., O'Dell, M., Gerlach, W. L., Dyer, T. A., Thompson, R. D., 1980: Molecular events in the evolution of cereal chromosomes In: Proceedings of the 4th John Innes Symposium, “The Plant Genome”, and 2nd International Haploid Conference, 15–30. Norwich: John Innes Charity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greilhuber, J., Speta, F., 1976: C-banded karyotypes in theScilla hohenackeri group,S. persica, andPuschkinia (Liliaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.126, 149–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerup, O., 1947: The spontaneous formation of haploid, polyploid and aneuploid embryos in some orchids. — K. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Biol. Meddel.20 (9), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindáková, M., 1976: In: Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora (Part 5),J. Májovský et al. (editors). — Acta Fac. Rer. Nat. Univ. Comenianae Bot.15, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: In: Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora (Part 6),J. Májovský et al. (editors). — Acta Fac. Rer. Nat. Univ. Comenianae Bot.16, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, K. F., van de Sande, J. H., Lin, C. C., 1978: The use of base pair specific DNA-binding agents as affinity labels for the study of mammalian chromosomes. — Chromosoma (Berl.)68, 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M., 1980: C-banding studies on Australian hylid frogs: secondary constriction structure and the concept of euchromatin transformation. — Chromosoma (Berl.)80, 191–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliphuis, E., 1963: Cytological observations in relation to the taxonomy of the orchids of the Netherlands. — Acta Bot. Neerlandica12, 172–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loidl, J., 1981: Das Heterochromatin einigerAlliumarten: Cytochemische Charakterisierung und cytogenetische Aspekte. — Dissertation Univ. Wien.

  • Löve, A., Kjellquist, E., 1973: Cytotaxonomy of Spanish plants. — Lagascalia3 (2), 147–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Löve, D., 1961: Chromosome numbers of central and northwest European plant species. — Opera Botanica5.

  • Malla, S. B., Bhattarai, S., Gorkhali, M., Saiju, H., Kayastha, M., 1978: In: IOBP chromosome number reports LIX. — Taxon27, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. E., 1977: The nature of centromeric dots inNigella chromosomes. — Chromosoma (Berl.)62, 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1974: Giemsa banding: Karyotype differences in some species ofAnemone and inHepatica nobilis. — Chromosoma (Berl.)44, 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, P. N., Bawa, K. S., 1962: Cytology of Indian orchids. — Proc. Ind. Sci. Cong. 49th Session (Bot. Sec.), 326–327.

  • —, 1970: Cytological observations on some northwest Himalayan orchids. — Caryologia23, 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, P. N., Kashyap, S. K., 1978: In: IOPB chromosome number reports LX. — Taxon27, 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1970: In IOPB chromosome numbers reports XXV. — Taxon19, 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1972: Cytological studies in the east HimalayanOrchidaceae, 1.:Neottieae. — Caryologia25, 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meili-Frei, E., 1966: Cytogenetik und Cytotaxonomie einheimischer Arten vonEpipactis, Listera, Neottia (Orchidaceae). — Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.75, 219–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miduno, T., 1938: Chromosomenstudien an Orchidazeen. I. Karyotyp Mixoploidie beiCephalanthera undEpipactis. — Cytologia8, 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahar, E., Latt, S. A., 1978: Enhancement of banding patterns in human metaphase chromosomes by energy transfer. — Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA75, 5650–5654.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Energy transfer and binding competitions between dyes used to enhance staining differentiation in metaphase chromosomes. — Chromosoma (Berl.)79, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnedl, W., Dann, O., Schweizer, D., 1980: Effects of counterstaining with DNA binding drugs on fluorescent banding pattern of human and mammalian chromosomes. — Eur. J. Cell Biol.20, 290–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher, T., Ambros, P., Schweizer, D., 1980: Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. — Pl. Syst. Evol.134, 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, D., 1973: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Längsdifferenzierung der Chromosomen vonVicia faba. — L. Verh. Naturf. Ges. Basel83, 1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976a: DAPI fluorescence of plant chromosomes prestained with actinomycin D. — Exp. Cell Res.102, 408–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976b: Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. — Chromosoma (Berl.)58, 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980a: Fluorescent chromosome banding in plants: applications, mechanisms, and implications for chromosome structure. In: Proceedings of the 4th John Innes Symposium, “The Plant Genome”, and 2nd International Haploid Conference, 61–72. — Norwich: John Innes Charity.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980b: Simultaneous fluorescent staining of R-bands and specific heterochromatic regions (DA-DAPI bands) in human chromosomes. — Cytogenet. Cell Genet.27, 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Review article: Counterstain-enhanced chromosome banding. — Hum. Genet.57, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: Modification of DAPI banding on human chromosomes by prestaining with a DNA-binding oligopeptide antibiotic, distamycin A. — Exp. Cell Res.111, 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976: Giemsa banded karyotypes, systematics, and evolution inAnacyclus (Asteraceae-Anthemideae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.126, 107–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalinska, M., Banach-Pogan, E., Wcislo, H., & al., 1957: Further studies in chromosome numbers of Polish angiosperms. — Acta Soc. Bot. Polon.26, (1), 215–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. M., 1974: Differential Giemsa staining of kinetochores and nucleolus organizer heterochromatin in mitotic chromosomes of higher plants. — Chromosoma47, 361–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. T., Evans, H. J., Buckland, R. A., 1973: Mechanisms involved in the banding of chromosomes with quinacrine and Giemsa. I. The effects of fixation in methanol-acetic acid. — Exp. Cell Res.81, 214–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titz, W., 1966: Chromosomenzahlen dreier Angiospermenarten aus Österreich. — Österr. Bot. Z.113, 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhriková, A., Feráová, V., 1978: In: IOBP chromosome number reports LXI. — Taxon27, 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vij, S. P., Gupta, G. C., 1975: Cytological investigations into W. HimalayanOrchidaceae I. Chromosome numbers and karyotypes of taxa from Kashmir. — Cytologia40, 613–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, A. K., 1966: Ein Beitrag zur Zytologie von Orchideen aus dem Gebiete der DDR. — Wiss. Zschr. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Univ. Greifswald Mat. nat. Reihe15, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisblum, B., 1973: Why centric regions of quinacrine treated mouse chromosomes show diminished fluorescence. — Nature246, 150–151.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Botanik, Universität Wien, Rennweg 14, A-1030, Wien, Austria

    Trude Schwarzacher & Dieter Schweizer

Authors
  1. Trude Schwarzacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dieter Schweizer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarzacher, T., Schweizer, D. Karyotype analysis and heterochromatin differentiation with Giemsa C-banding and fluorescent counterstaining inCephalanthera (Orchidaceae). Pl Syst Evol 141, 91–113 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986411

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986411

Key words

Search

Navigation