Skip to main content
Log in

Variation of Giemsa C-band and fluorochrome banded karyotypes, and relationships inAllium subgen.Molium

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The somatic karyotypes of 10 taxa belonging toAllium subgen.Molium (Liliaceae) from the Mediterranean area have been investigated using Giemsa C-band and fluorochrome (Hoechst, Quinacrine) banding techniques. A wide range of banding patterns has been revealed. InAllium moly (2n = 14),A. oreophilum (2n = 16) andA. paradoxum (2n = 16) C-banding is restricted to a region on each side of the nucleolar organisers and the satellites show reduced fluorescence with fluorochromes. The satellites are also C-banded and with reduced fluorescence inA. triquetrum (2n = 18), but two other chromosome pairs also have telomeric bands which are not distinguished by fluorochrome treatment. InA. erdelii (2n = 16) 4 pairs of metacentric chromosomes have telomeric C-bands while 2 pairs of telocentric chromosomes have centromeric C-banding. InA. subhirsutum (2n = 14),A. neapolitanum (2n = 28),A. trifoliatum subsp.hirsutum (2n = 14) andA. trifoliatum subsp.trifoliatum (2n = 21) chromosomes with long centromeres, consisting of a centromere and nucleolar organiser are positively C-banded on each side of the constriction. InA. subhirsutum banding is confined to the pair of chromosomes with this feature, whereas inA. neapolitanum one additional chromosome pair has telomeric bands and inA. trifoliatum there are varying numbers of chromosomes with centromeric and telomeric bands, depending on the subspecies.A. zebdanense (2n = 18) shows no C-bands. The banding patterns in this subgenus are compared with those recorded for otherAllium species and with the sectional divisions in the genus. Evidence from the banding patterns for allopolyploidy inA. trifoliatum subsp.trifoliatum andA. neapolitanum is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barling, D. M., 1958: Reproduction and cytology ofAllium paradoxum. Proc. Bot. Soc. Br. Isl.3, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissier, E., 1882:Allium. In: Flora Orientalis5, 229–285. Genevae et Basileae: H. Georg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, S. E., 1963: Cytological studies in sectionMolium of the genusAllium. Genetics Today1, 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1964: Evolution inAllium erdelii andAllium roseum varieties. Xth Int. Bot. Congr. Edinburgh, Abstr. 364.

  • Ekberg, L., 1969: Studies in the genusAllium, II. A new subgenus and new species from Asia. Bot. Notiser122, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gadi, A., Elkington, T. T., 1975: Comparisons of the Giemsa C-band karyotypes and relationships ofAllium cepa, A. fistulosum andA. galanthum. Chromosoma51, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinbrun, D., 1950: Chromosome counts in PalestinianAllium species. Palest. J. Bot. Jerusalem Ser.5, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiskesjö, G., 1975: Chromosomal relationships between three species ofAllium as revealed by C-banding. Hereditas81, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greilhuber, J., Speta, F. (1976): C-banded karyotypes in theScilla hohenackeri group,S. persica, andPuschkinia (Liliaceae). Plant Syst. Evol.126: 149–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattersley-Smith, M. K., 1956:Allium neapolitanum: a mixed species. Nature178, 272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. C., 1973: Longitudinal differentiation of chromosomes. A. Rev. Genet.7, 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalal, S. M., Clark, R. W., Hsu, T. C., Pathak, S., 1974: Cytological Differentiation of Constitutive Heterochromatin. Chromosoma48, 391–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, F., 1969: Cytotaxonomic polymorphism in theAllium erdelii group. Israel J. Bot.18, 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1970: Karyotypes of threeAllium species of theerdelii group. Caryologia23, 647–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1973: Caryology of some species ofAllium sectionMolium. Israel J. Bot.22, 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1975: Note:Allium trifoliatum subsp.hirsutum. Israel J. Bot.24, 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurita, M., 1956: Karyotypes of some species inAllium. Mem. Ehim Univ. Sect. II2, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan, A., 1931: Cytological Studies inAllium: A Preliminary Note. Hereditas15, 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1932: Cytological Studies inAllium: II. Chromosome Morphological Contribution. Hereditas16, 257–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1935: Cytological Studies inAllium: IV. The Chromosome Morphology of some diploid species ofAllium. Hereditas20, 289–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. E., Schweizer, D., 1974: Giemsa Banding: Karyotype Differences in some species ofAnemone and inHepatica nobilis. Chromosoma44, 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinoli, G., 1955: Cariologia di alcune specie del genereAllium (Liliaceae) della Sardegna Caryologia7, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, K., Wendelbo, P., 1966: Chromosome number of some S. W. AsianAllium species. Blyttia24, 307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regel, E., 1875:Alliorum adhuc cognitorum monographia. Acta Horti Petrop.3, 1–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, D., Ehrendorfer, F., 1976: Giemsa banded karyotypes, systematics, and evolution inAnacyclus (Asteraceae-Anthemideae). Plant Syst. Evol.126, 107–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. M., Clarke, C. R., 1973: Differential Giemsa staining of the telomeres ofAllium cepa chromosomes. Observations related to chromosome pairing. Can. J. Genet. Cytol.15, 619–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearn, W. T., 1946: Notes on the genusAllium in the old world. Herbertia (La Jolla)11, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakhtina, L. J., 1964: Chromosome number of some species ofAllium wide-spread in U.S.S.R. Bot. Ž. (SSSR)49, 870–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1969: A comparative karyological investigation of some species ofAllium L. (Liliaceae) belonging to the sectionMolium. Bot. Ž. (SSSR)54, 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ved Brat, S., 1965: Genetic systems inAllium: I. chromosome variation. Chromosoma16, 486–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosa, C. G., 1970: Heterochromatin recognition with fluorochromes. Chromosoma30, 366–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1971: The quinacrine fluorescence patterns of the chromosomes ofAllium carinatum. Chromosoma33, 382–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1973: The enhanced and reduced fluorescence bands and their relationship to the Giemsa patterns inAllium flavum. Nobel Symposium23, 156–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1974: The basic karyotype of rye (Secale cereale) analyzed with Giemsa and fluorescence methods. Heredity33, 403–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1975: The use of Giemsa and other staining techniques in karyotype analysis. Curr. Adv. Plant Sci.14, 495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976a: Heterochromatic patterns inAllium: I. The relationship between the species of thecepa group and its allies. Heredity36, 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976b: Heterochromatic patterns inAllium: II. Heterochromatin variation in species of thepaniculatum group. Chromosoma57, 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendelbo, P., 1971:Alliaceae. InRechinger, K. H. (Ed.): Flora Iranica76. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badr, A., Elkington, T.T. Variation of Giemsa C-band and fluorochrome banded karyotypes, and relationships inAllium subgen.Molium . Pl Syst Evol 128, 23–35 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985168

Key words

Navigation