Collaborative learning in university grammar courses
- James W. Ney
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
An innovative collaborative learning model, used for the teaching of modern English grammar classes, combined elements from peer teaching and cooperative learning. This model is innovative for higher education since it involved students and instructor co-laboring to master knowledge as a socially held phenomenon without any authoritarian leveling. It involved: 1) Student lectures explaining assigned readings from the text(s); 2) Daily quizzes of the material from the assigned reading; and 3) Student grading of the daily quizzes and exams with the instructor checking for accuracy. Student attitudinal surveys revealed positive perceptions of students on the whole toward the conduct of the class. An even greater positive aspect of the collaborative learning model used here is the attainment of a high level of mastery of the subject matter and almost perfect classroom attendance.
- Bassano, S. & Christison, M.A. (1988). Cooperative learning in the ESL classroom.TESOL Newsletter, 22 (2), pp. 1, 8–9.
- Bejarano, Y. (1987). A cooperative small-group methodology in the language classroom.TESOL Quarterly, 21 (3), 483–504.
- Burton-Roberts, N. (1986).Analyzing sentences: An introduction to English syntax. London and New York: Longman.
- Celani, M.A.A. (1979). Peer teaching as a motivating factor in developing communicative skills.English Language Teaching Journal, 33 (3), 197–199.
- Chesterfield, R.A. & Chesterfield, K.B. (1985). Hoja's with the H: Spontaneous peer teaching in bilingual classrooms.The Bilingual Review/La Revista Bilingue, 12(3), 198–208.
- Cook, W.A. (1969).Introduction to tagmemic analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Cooper, C.R., Lopez, A.S., & Marquis, A. (1982). Children's discourse during peer learning in experimental and naturalistic situations.Discourse Processes, 5 (2), 177–191.
- Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education.International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 9–19.
- Gleason, H.A. (1965).Linguistics and English grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Gunderson, B. & Johnson, D. (1980). Building positive attitudes by using cooperative learning groups.Foreign Language Annals, 13 (1), 39–43.
- Heller, M. & Barker, B. (1988). Conversational strategies and contexts for talk: Learning activities for Franco-Ontarian minority schools.Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 19 (1), 20–47.
- Hernandon, J. (1954).Structural grammar. New York: McGraw Hill.
- Hester, H. (1984). Peer interaction in learning English as a second language.Theory into Practice, 23 (3), 208–217.
- Jespersen, O. (1968) .Analytical Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Johnson, T.S. (1986). A comment on ‘collaborative learning and the conversation of mankind.’College English 48, 76.
- Knoop, R. (1980). Job involvement of teachers. Paper presented to the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Toledo Ohio. ED 208 508.
- Lambiotte, J.G., Dansereau, D.F., O'Donnell, A.M., Young, M.D., Skaggs, L.P., & Hall, R.F. (1988). Effects of cooperative script manipulations on initial learning and transfer,Cognition and Instruction, 5 (2), 103–121.
- Larson, C.O., Dansereau, D.F., O'Donnell, A., Hythecker, V., Lambiotte, J.G., & Rocklin, T.R. (1984). Verbal ability and cooperative learning: Transfer of effects.Journal of Reading Behavior, 16 (4), 289–295.
- Lockwood, D.G. (1972).Introduction to stratificational linguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Lodahl, T.M. & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 49 (1), 24–33.
- Magin, D.J. (1982). Collaborative peer learning in the laboratory.Studies in Higher Education, 7 (2), 105–117.
- McCreary, C.P. (1977). Training psychology and law students to work together.Professional Psychology, 8 (1), 103–108.
- Mocker, D.W. (1975). Cooperative learning process: Shared learning experience in teaching adults to read.Journal of Reading, 18 (6), 440–444.
- Ney, James W. (1980). Student attitudes toward a writing class.Arizona English Bulletin, 22, 105–112.
- Oddi, L. (1983). The lecture: An update on research.Adult Education Quarterly, 33 (4), 222–229.
- Osgood, C.E., Suci, J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Palinscar, A.S., Stevens, D.D., & Gavelek, J.R. (1989). Collaborating with teachers in the interest of student collaboration.International Journal of Educational Research, 13 (1), 41–53.
- Perez, S.A. (1979). How to effectively teach Spanish-speaking children, even if you're not bilingual.Language Arts, 56 (2), 159–162.
- Plaister, T. (1977). Providing practice teaching through peer teaching: A realistic approach.TESL Reporter, 10 (4), 1–3, 12.
- Smit, D.W. (1989). Some difficulties with collaborative learning.Journal of Advanced Composition, 9 (1–2), 45–48.
- Snell, M.E. (1979). Higher functioning residents as language trainers of the mentally retarded.Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 14 (2), 77–84.
- Topping, K.J. (1988).The peer tutoring handbook: Promoting cooperative learning. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
- Wagner, L. (1982)Peer teaching: Historical perspectives. London: Greenwood Press.
- Welds, K. (1986). Experiential education format to develop self-direction and authority.Innovative Higher Education, 10 (2), 128–133.
- Whitman, N.A. (1988).Peer teaching: To teach is to learn twice. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
- Collaborative learning in university grammar courses
Innovative Higher Education
Volume 15, Issue 2 , pp 153-165
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press
- Additional Links
- James W. Ney (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Arizona State University, USA