Skip to main content
Log in

Perception, illusion, and hallucination

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patrick Suppes' set-theoretical approach to the analysis of theories, and Joseph D. Sneed's metatheory are briefly outlined. The notions of observation, illusion and hallucination are reconstructed according to these approaches. It is argued that the terms ‘perception’ and ‘truth’ are theoretical with respect to observation but nontheoretical with respect to illusion and hallucination. Hallucination is construed as a special kind of illusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, E. W.:Axiomatic Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford Univ., 1955.

  2. Adams, E. W.: ‘The foundations of rigid body mechanics and the derivation of its laws from those of particle mechanics’, in L. Henkin, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.),The Axiomatic Method, pp. 250–265, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1959.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldamus, W.: ‘Das exoterische Paradox der Wissenschaftsforschung. Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftstheorie Ludwik Flecks’,Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 10, (1979) 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balzer, W.:Empirische Geometrie und Raum-Zeit-Theorie in mengentheoretischer Darstellung, Scriptor Verlag, Kronberg, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balzer, W.: ‘Die epistemologische Rolle des zweiten Newtonschen Axioms’,Philosophia Naturalis 17, (1978) 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balzer, W.: ‘On the status of arithmetic’,Erkenntnis 14, (1979) 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Balzer, W.: ‘Mathematical structures as representations of intellectual structures’,Dialectica 34, (1980) 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Balzer, W.: ‘Über Quines Beobachtungssätze’,Kant-Studien 72, (1981) 336–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Balzer, W. and Moulines, C. U.: ‘On theoreticity’,Synthese 44, (1980) 467–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Balzer, W., and Sneed, J. D.: ‘Generalized net structures of empirical theories. I’,Studia Logica 36, (1977) 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Balzer, W. and Sneed, J. D.: ‘Generalized net structures of empirical theories. II’,Studia Logica 37, (1978) 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Batchelder, W. H., and Wexler, K.: ‘Suppes' work in the foundations of psychology’, in [13] Bogdan, R. J. (ed.):Patrick Suppes, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979, pp. 149–186.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Bogdan, R. J. (ed.):Patrick Suppes, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carnap, R.: ‘Über die Aufgabe der Physik und die Anwendung des Grundsatzes der Einfachstheit’,Kant-Studien 28, (1923) 90–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carnap, R.: ‘Testability and meaning’,Philosophy of Science 3, (1936) 419–471;4, (1937) 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carnap, R.:Foundations of Logic and Mathematics, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carnap, R.: ‘Beobachtungssprache und theoretische Sprache’,Dialectica 12, (1959) 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carnap, R.: ‘Replies and systematic expositions’ in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, pp. 859–1013, The Library of Living Philosophers Inc. La Salle, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carnap, R.:Philosophical Foundations of Physics. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Basic Books, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  20. da Costa, N. C. A.:Sistemas Formais Inconsistentes, Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Diederich, W.:Strukturalistische Rekonstruktionen, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1981.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Diederich, W. and Fulda, H. F.: ‘Sneed'sche Strukturen in Marx “Kapital”’,Neue Hefte für Philosophie 13, (1974) 47–80.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Duhem, P.:The Aim and Structure of Physical Theories; translated by P. Wiener and foreworded by P. L. de Broglie, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feyerabend, P.: ‘Changing patterns of reconstruction’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28, (1977) 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fleck, L.: ‘Zur Frage der Grundlagen der medizinischen Erkenntnis’Klinische Wochenschrift 14, (1935) 1255–1259. (Engl. transl. in [91].)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fleck, L.:Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, Benno Schwabe, Basel, 1935. (Engl. transl. in [27].)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fleck, L.:Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact; Engl. transl. of [26] by F. Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goodman, N.: ‘Words, works, worlds’,Erkenntnis 9 (1975) 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Goosens, W. K.: ‘Reduction by molecular genetics’,Philosophy of Science 45, (1978) 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Göttner, H. and Jacobs, J.:Der logische Aufbau von Literaturtheorien, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, München, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Grandy, R. E.: ‘Suppes' contribution to logic and linguistics’, in Bogdan, R. J. (ed.):Patrick Suppes, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979, pp. 131–147.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Händler, E. W.: ‘The logical structure of modern neoclassical static microeconomic equilibrium theory’,Erkenntnis 15, (1980) 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Händler, E. W.: ‘The role of utility and of statistical concepts in empirical economic theories: The empirical claims of the systems of aggregate market supply and demand functions approach’,Erkenntnis 15, (1980) 129–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanson, N. R.:Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hanson, N. R.: ‘Observation and interpretation’, in S. Morgenbesser (ed.),Philosophy of Science Today, pp. 89–99, Basic Books, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Harris, J. H.: ‘A semantical alternative to Sneed-Stegmüller-Kuhn conception of scientific theories’,Acta Philosophica Fennica 30, (1978) 184–204.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hempel, C. G.: ‘The theoretician's dilemma: A study in the logic of theory construction’, reprinted in C. G. Hempel,Aspects of Scientific Explanation, pp. 173–226, The Free Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hempel, C. G.: ‘On the “standard conception” of scientific theories’,Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4, (1970) 142–163.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hucklenbroich, P.:Theorie des Erkenntnisfortschritts. Zum Verhältnis von Erfahrung und Methoden in den Naturwissenschaften, Anton Hain, Meisenheim, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hucklenbroich, P.: ‘Epistemological reflections on the structuralist philosophy of science’,Metamedicine 3, (1982) (this issue).

  41. Jamison, B. N.:An Axiomatic Treatment of Lagrange's Equations, M. S. thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A.:Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kuhn, T. S.:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Luce, R. D.: ‘Suppes' contributions to the theory of measurement’, in Bogdan, R. J. (ed.):Patrick Suppes, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979, pp. 93–110.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Ludwig, G.:Deutung des Begriffs “physikalische Theorie” und axiomatische Grundlegung der Hilbertraumstruktur der Quantenmechanik durch Hauptsätze des Messens, Springer, Berlin, 1970.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Ludwig, G.:Die Grundstrukturen einer physikalischen Theorie, Springer, Berlin, 1978.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. McKinsey, J. C. C., and Suppes, P.: ‘On the notion of invariance in classical mechanics’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5, (1955) 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McKinsey, J. C. C., Sugar, A. C., and Suppes, P.: ‘Axiomatic foundations of classical particle mechanics’,Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis 2, (1953) 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Moulines, C. U.: ‘A logical reconstruction of simple equilibrium thermodynamics’,Erkenntnis 9, (1975) 101–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Moulines, C. U.:Zur logischen Rekonstruktion der Thermodynamik; Eine wissenschaftstheoretische Analyse, Dissertation, Universität München, 1975.

  51. Moulines, C. U.: ‘Approximate application of empirical theories: A general explication’,Erkenntnis 10, (1976) 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Moulines, C. U.: ‘Intertheoretic approximation: The Kepler-Newton case’,Synthese 45, (1980) 387–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Moulines, C. U. and Sneed, J. D.: ‘Suppes' philosophy of physics’, in Bogdan, R. J. (ed.):Patrick Suppes, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979. pp. 59–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Müller, U. and Pilatus, S.: ‘On Hodgkin and Huxley's theory of excitable membranes’,Metamedicine 3, (1982) (this issue).

  55. Pearce, D.: ‘Is there any theoretical justification for a nonstatmenet view of theories?’,Synthese 46, (1981) 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Quine, W. V. O.:Word and Object, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Quine, W. V. O.:From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Quine, W. V. O.:The Roots of Reference, Open Court Publ. Co., La Salle, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rádl, E.:Geschichte der biologischen Theorien. Teil II: Geschichte der Entwicklungstheorien in der Biologie des XIX. Jahrhunderts, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rantala, V.: ‘On the logical basis of the structuralist philosophy of science’,Erkenntnis 15, (1980) 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rosenkrantz, R. D.: ‘Suppes on probability, utility, and decision theory’, in Bogdan, R. J. (ed.):Patrick Suppes, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979. pp. 111–129.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  62. Schäfer, L.: ‘Über den wissenschaftlichen Status medizinischer Forschung. Fallstudie und Rekonstruktion nach Ludwik Fleck’, lecture delivered at the Sixth Interdisciplinary Symposium on Philosophy and Medicine, Hamburg, September 1–3, 1977.

  63. Scheibe, E.:The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Scheibe, E.: ‘Conditions of progress and the comparability of theories’, in R. S. Cohen et al. (eds.),Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1976, pp. 547–568.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Scheibe, E.: ‘On the structure of physical theories’,Acta Philosophica Fennica 30, (1978) 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Scheibe, E.: ‘A comparison of two recent views on theories’,Metamedicine 3, (1982) (this issue).

  67. Sneed, J. D.:The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1971.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  68. Sneed, J. D.: ‘Philosophical problems in the empirical science of science: A formal approach’,Erkenntnis 10, (1976) 115–146.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sneed, J. D.: ‘Theoretization and invariance principles’,Acta Philosophica Fennica 30, (1978) 130–178.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Stegmüller, W.:Theorie und Erfahrung, erster Halbband, Springer, Berlin, 1970.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  71. Stegmüller W.:Theorie und Erfahrung, zweiter Halbband, Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, Springer, Berlin, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Stegmüller, W.: ‘Theoriendynamik und logisches Verständnis’, in W. Diederich (ed.),Theorien der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Beiträge zur diachronischen Wissenschaftstheorie, pp. 167–209, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Stegmüller, W.:Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie, Band II, pp. 483–534, Alfred Kröner Verlag, Stuttgart, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Stegmüller, W.:The Structure and Dynamics of Theories; engl. transl. of [71], Springer, Berlin, 1976.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  75. Stegmüller, W.: ‘Accidental (‘non-substantial’) theory change and theory dislodgment: To what extent logic can contribute to a better understanding of certain phenomena in the dynamics of theories’,Erkenntnis 10, (1976) 147–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Stegmüller, W.: ‘The structuralist view: Survey, recent developments and answers to some criticisms’,Acta Philosophica Fennica 30, (1978) 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Stegmüller, W.:The Structuralist View of Theories. A Possible Analogue of the Bourbaki Programme in Physical Science, Springer, Berlin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Stegmüller, W.:Neue Wege der Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Springer, Berlin, 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  79. Suppe, F.: ‘The search for philosophic understanding of scientific theories’, in F. Suppe (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, pp. 3–232, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Suppes, P.: ‘A set of independent axioms for extensive quantities’,Portugaliae Mathematica 10, (1951) 163–172. (Reprinted in [87], pp. 36–45.)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Suppes, P.:Introduction to Logic, Van Nostrand, New York, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Suppes, P.: ‘Axioms for relativistic kinematics with or without parity’, in L. Henkin, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.),The Axiomatic Method, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1959, pp. 291–307.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  83. Suppes, P.: ‘A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences’,Synthese 12, (1960) 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Suppes, P.:Axiomatic Set Theory, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Suppes, P.: ‘Models of data’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.),Logi Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, pp. 252–261, Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford 1962. (Reprinted in [87], pp. 24–35.)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Suppes, P.: ‘What is a scientific theory?’, in S. Morgenbesser (ed.),Philosophy of Science Today, pp. 55–67, Basic Books, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Suppes, P.:Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science, Selected papers from 1951 to 1969, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Suppes, P.:Set-Theoretical Structures in Science, mimeogr., Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford, January 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Suppes, P., and Zinnes, J. L.: ‘Basic measurement theory’, in R. D. Luce et al. (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York, 1963, pp. 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Tarski, A.:Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Trenn, T. J.: ‘Ludwik Fleck's “On the question of the foundations of medical knowledge”’,The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6, (1981) 237–256. (Engl. transl. of [25].)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Westmeyer, H.et al.: ‘A theory of behavior interaction in dyads: A structuralist account’,Metamedicine 3, (1982) (this issue).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank Mrs. Waltraud Röckener for secretarial assistance, and Dr. Peter Hucklenbroich for encouragement, support and criticism.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadegh-Zadeh, K. Perception, illusion, and hallucination. Metamedicine 3, 159–191 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00882203

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00882203

Key words

Navigation