Darwin's language may seem teleological, but his thinking is another matter
- Cite this article as:
- Ghiselin, M.T. Biol Philos (1994) 9: 489. doi:10.1007/BF00850377
- 169 Downloads
Darwin's biology was “teleological” only if the term “teleology” is defined in a manner that fails to recognize his contribution to the metaphysics and epistemology of modern science. His use of teleological metaphors in a strictly teleonomic context is irrelevant to the meaning of his discourse. The myth of Darwin's alleged teleology is partly due to misinterpretations of discussions about whether morphology should be a purely formal science. Merely rejecting such notions as special creation and vitalism does not prevent the pernicious effects of teleological reasoning, even at the present time.