Intuitionistic mathematics does not needex falso quodlibet
- Neil Tennant
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
We define a system IR of first-order intuitionistic relevant logic. We show that intuitionistic mathematics (on the assumption that it is consistent) can be relevantized, by virtue of the following metatheorem: any intuitionistic proof of A from a setX of premisses can be converted into a proof in IR of eitherA or absurdity from some subset ofX. Thus IR establishes the same inconsistencies and theorems as intuitionistic logic, and allows one to prove every intuitionistic consequence of any consistent set of premisses.
- Milne, P.: 1994, ‘Intuitionistic Relevant Logic and Perfect Validity’,Analysis (in press).
- Prawitz, D.: 1965,Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.
- Tennant, N.: 1978,Natural Logic, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
- Tennant, N.: 1980, ‘A Proof-Theoretic Approach to Entailment’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 9, 185–209. CrossRef
- Tennant, N.: 1984, ‘Perfect Validity, Entailment and Paraconsistency’,Studia Logica 43, 179–198. CrossRef
- Tennant, N.: 1987a, ‘Natural Deduction and Sequent Calculus for Intuitionistic Relevant Logic’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 52, 665–680. CrossRef
- Tennant, N.: 1987b,Anti-Realism and Logic, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- Intuitionistic mathematics does not needex falso quodlibet
Volume 13, Issue 2 , pp 127-133
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Neil Tennant (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. The Ohio State University and Churchill College, Cambridge