Abstract
This paper examines a new challenge to neo-Darwinism, a movement known as process structuralism. The process structuralist critique of neo-Darwinism holds 1) that there are general laws in biology and that biologists should search for these laws; 2) that there are general forms of morphology and development and that biologists should attempt to uncover these forms; 3) that organisms are unified wholes that cannot be understood without adopting a holistic perspective; and 4) that no special, causal primacy should be given to the genes in development and morphology. This paper places process structuralism in its historical context, examines the philosophical underpinnings of the movement, and discusses some of the evidence used to support its claims.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle. (1947). Introduction to Aristotle. Edited by Richard McKeon. New York, The Modern Library.
Crick, F. (1968). The origin of the genetic code. Journal of Molecular Biology 38: 367–78.
Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype. Oxford, W.H. Freeman.
Eldridge, N. and S. Gould (1972). Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: T. Schopf, ed., Models in Paleobiology, p. 82–115. San Francisco, Freeman, Cooper, and Co.
Goldschmidt, R. (1935). Geographische variation und artbildung. Nature 23: 169–176.
Goldschmidt, R. (1938). Physiological Genetics. New York, McGraw Hill.
Goodwin, B. (1984). A relational field theory of reproduction and its evolutionary implications. In: Ho and Saunders, p. 219–242.
Gould, S. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Gould, S. and R. Lewontin (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205: 581–598.
Ho, M. and P. Saunders, eds. (1984). Beyond Neo-Darwinism. London, Academic Press.
Ho, M. (1984). Environment and heredity in development and evolution. In Ho and Saunders, p. 267–290.
Hull, D. (1978). A matter of individuality. Philosophy of Science 45: 335–360.
Jacob, F. (1982). The Possible and the Actual. New York, Pantheon Books.
Kant, I. (1928). Critique of Teleological Judgement. Translated by J.C. Meredith, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. (1929). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by N. Kemp-Smith, London, Macmillan and Co.
Kauffman, S. (1983). Developmental constraints: internal factors in evolution. In: B. Goodwin, N. Holder, and C. Wylie, eds., Development and Evolution, p. 195–226. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kauffman, S. (1985). Self-organization, selective adaptation and its limits: a new pattern of inference in evolution and development. In: D. Depew and B. Weber, eds., Evolution at a Crossroads, Cambridge, MA, M.I.T. Press.
Kauffman, S. (1993). The Origins of Order. New York, Oxford University Press.
Kimura, M. (1983). The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Margulis, L. (1981). Symbiosis and Cell Evolution. San Francisco, Freeman.
Maynard Smith, J. et al. (1985). Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology 60: 265–287.
Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science 134: 1501–1506.
Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Mayr, E. (1988). Towards a New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Monod, J. (1971). Chance and Necessity. New York, Alfred A. Knopf.
Nijhout, F. (1985). The developmental physiology of color patterns inlepidoptera. Advances in Insect Physiology 18: 181–247.
Resnik, D. (1988). Survival of the fittest: law of probability or law of evolution? Biology and Philisophy 3: 349–362.
Rosenberg, A. (1985). The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Ruse, M. (1979). The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Saunders, P. (1984). Development and evolution. In: Ho and Saunders, p. 243–266.
Smith, K. (1992a). The new problem of genetics: a response to Gifford. Biology and Philosophy 7: 331–348.
Smith, K. (1992b). Neo-rationalism versus neo-Darwinism: integrating development and evolution. Biology and Philosophy 7: 431–451.
Sober, E. (1984). The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA, The M.I.T. Press.
Waddington, C. (1940). Organizers and Genes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Waddington, C. (1957). The Strategy of Genes. London, Allen and Unwin.
Webster, G. (1984). The relations of natural forms. In: Ho and Saunders, p. 193–218.
Webster, G. and B. Goodwin (1982). The origin of species: a structuralist approach. Journal of Social and Biological Structures. 5: 15–47.
Wolpert, L. (1969). Positional information and pattern formation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 25: 1–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Resnik, D. The rebirth of rational morphology. Acta Biotheor 42, 1–14 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706837
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706837