Evaluative and factual ad claims, knowledge level, and making inferences
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A lab study examined the effect of type of ad claim (factual versus evaluative) and knowledge level on subjects' product feature inference making from three camera ads. Each ad had some missing brand information. The results showed that as knowledge increased, so did inference making. Also, there was a significant interaction between ad claim and knowledge. Inference making was positively correlated with knowledge level for factual ads but not for evaluative ones. Finally, subjects made very few inferences to fill in missing ad features but instead did more interpretive processing.
- Anderson, Rolph E., and Marvin A. Jolson. (1980). “Technical Wording in Advertising: Implications for Market Segmentation,”Journal of Marketing 44, 47–66.
- Alba, Joseph W., and J. Wesley Hutchinson. (1987). “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research 13(4), 411–454.
- Bettman, James R., and C. Whan Park. (1980). “Implications of a Constructive View of Choice for Analysis of Protocol Data: A Coding Scheme for Elements of Choice Processes.” In Jerry Olson (ed.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 148–153.
- Brucks, Merrie. (1985). “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June), 1–16.
- Carlston, Donal E. (1980). “The Recall and Use of Traits and Events in Social Inference Processes,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16 (July), 303–328.
- Chattopadhyay, Amitava, and Joseph W. Alba. (1988). “The Situational Importance of Recall and Inference in Consumer Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research 15(1), 1–12.
- Dick, Alan, Dipankar, Chakravarti, and Gabriel J. Biehal. (1990). “Memory Based Inferences During Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research 17(1), 82–93.
- Dover, Phillip A. (1981). “Inferential Belief Formation: An Overlooked Concept in Information Processing Research.” In Thomas Kinnear (ed.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 187–189.
- Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen. (1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
- Ford, Gary T., and Ruth A. Smith. (1987). “Inferential Beliefs in Consumer Evaluations: An Assessment of Alternative Processing Strategies,”Journal of Consumer Research 14(3), 363–371.
- Gardial, Sarah Fisher, and Gabriel Biehal. (1986). “Measuring Consumers' Inferential Processing in Choice.” In E. C. Hirschman and M. B. Holbrook (eds.),Advances in Consumer Research Vol. XII. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 101–105.
- Gardial, Sarah Fisher, and David W. Schumann. (1990). “In Search of the Elusive Consumer Inference.” In M. Goldberg, G. Gorn, and R. Pollay (eds.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. XVII. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 283–287.
- Greenwald, Anthony G., and Clark Leavitt. (1984). “Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels,”Journal of Consumer Research 11(1), 581–592.
- Holbrook, Morris B. (1978). “Beyond Attitude Structures Toward Inferential Determinants of Attitude,”Journal of Marketing Research 15, 545–556.
- Huber, Joel, and John McCann. (1982). “The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations,”Journal of Marketing Research 14, 324–333.
- Jaccard, James, and Gregory Wood. (1988). “The Effects of Incomplete Information on the Formation of Attitudes Toward Behavioral Alternatives,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(4), 580–591.
- Johnson, Richard D., and Irwin P. Levin. (1985). “More Than Meets the Eye: The Effect of Missing Information on Purchase Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research 12, 169–177.
- Kardes, Frank. (1988). “Spontaneous Inference Processes in Advertising: The Effects of Conclusion Omission and Involvement on Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research 15(2), 225–233.
- Kardes, Frank. (1986). “Effects of Initial Product Judgments on Subsequent Memory-Based Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research 13(1), 1–11.
- Lynch, John G., Howard, Marmorstein, and Michael F. Weigold. (1988). “Choices from Sets Including Remembered Brands: Use of Recalled Attributes and Prior Overall Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research 15(2), 169–184.
- Miller, Raymond B. (1980). “Inferences at Comprehension: Fact or Artifact?”Journal of Reading Behavior 12(4), 279–297.
- Peter, J. Paul. (1979). “Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices,”Journal of Marketing Research 16, 6–17.
- Shimp, Terence A., and Ivan L. Preston. (1981). “Deceptive and Non-Deceptive Consequences of Evaluative Advertising,”Journal of Marketing 45(1), 22–32.
- Sujan, Mita. (1985). “Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research 12(1), 31–46.
- Sujan, Mita, and Christine Dekleva. (1987). “Product Categorization and Inference Making: Some Implications for Comparative Advertising,”Journal of Consumer Research 14(3), 372–378.
- Wyer, Robert S.Jr., and Donal E. Carlston. (1979).Social Cognition, Inference, and Attribution. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Evaluative and factual ad claims, knowledge level, and making inferences
Volume 2, Issue 4 , pp 349-358
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Inference Making
- Ad Claim
- Product Knowledge
- Industry Sectors