Acuity of compound eyes: Physical limitations and design
- Allan W. SnyderAffiliated withInstitute of Advanced Studies, Departments of Applied Mathematics and Neurobiology, Australian National University
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The limitations to resolving power include: the intensity of light, angular motion, receptor grain, lens-pupil blur, finite diameter of rhabdom, and neural convergence.
Only those animals that are active in bright sunlight and normally have low angular velocity, profit by having some region of their eyes near the diffraction limit, i.e.DΔφ ≅ 0.58λ, whereD is the facet diameter,Δφ the interommatidial angle and λ the wavelength in vacuum. If these conditions are not fulfilled, it is better to have a largerDΔφ.
The effect of an animal undergoing angular velocityu is equivalent to a reduction in light intensity by the amount exp−1.78(φtΔφ)2, where φt is the amount the animal turns in one integration time. Taking this into account, we present a possible explanation forMusca havingDΔφ about 4.5 times greater than the diffraction limit.
Various strategies for dark-adaptation are considered with the conclusion that neural pooling combined with a widening of the acceptance angle is most effective for coping with reduced intensities.
- Acuity of compound eyes: Physical limitations and design
Journal of comparative physiology
Volume 116, Issue 2 , pp 161-182
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Allan W. Snyder (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute of Advanced Studies, Departments of Applied Mathematics and Neurobiology, Australian National University, A.C.T. 2600, Canberra, Australia