Neuroradiology

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 27–30

Randomised double blind trial of the safety and efficacy of two gadolinium complexes (Gd-DTPA and Gd-DOTA)

Authors

  • P. Brugiores
    • Neuroradiology DepartmentHôpital Henri Mondor
  • A. Gaston
    • Neuroradiology DepartmentHôpital Henri Mondor
  • H. R. Degryse
    • University Department of Radiology Ziekenhuis
  • P. M. Parizel
    • University Department of Radiology Ziekenhuis
  • A. M. de Schepper
    • University Department of Radiology Ziekenhuis
  • I. Berry
    • Neuroradiology DepartmentHôpital Purpan
  • C. Manelfe
    • Neuroradiology DepartmentHôpital Purpan
  • F. Le Bras
    • Neuroradiology DepartmentHôpital Pitié Salpétrière
  • C. Marsauh
    • Neuroradiology DepartmentHôpital Pitié Salpétrière
  • W. Wichmann
    • Abteilung für NeuroradiologieUniversitätsspital Zürich
  • A. Valavanis
    • Abteilung für NeuroradiologieUniversitätsspital Zürich
Diagnostic Neuroradiology

DOI: 10.1007/BF00599189

Cite this article as:
Brugiores, P., Gaston, A., Degryse, H.R. et al. Neuroradiology (1994) 36: 27. doi:10.1007/BF00599189

Abstract

The main difference between macrocyclic Gd-DOTA and linear Gd-DTPA complexes is the greater stability of the former which theoretically might reduce biological interactions in man. To evaluate the clinical relevance of this property, 300 unselected neurological patients were included in a randomised double-blind comparison involving five European centres, focused mainly on the tolerance of these two contrast media. Clinical tolerance was assessed immediatley after the procedure and 24 h later. Adverse events were found with a similar frequency in the two groups (17.3% for Gd-DOTA and 19.3% for Gd-DTPA). Minor neurological symptoms were the most frequent (48.6%) headache being the most common (29.2% of adverse events). No difference in efficacy was found.

Key words

Contrast mediaMRComparative studiesGadolinium

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994