Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics of methadone in methadone maintenance treatment: Characterization of therapeutic failures

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Deuterated methadone (M-d3) and GC-MS analysis were used to study the steady state pharmacokinetics of methadone (M) in eight patients reported as therapeutic failures in a methadone maintenance treatment programme. The patients were compared to an unselected group of 12 patients stabilized on M for 25 days. During one dosage interval a pulse dose of M-d3 was administered intravenously instead of the oral M-dose (M-d0). The pharmacokinetic parameters, half-life in the β-phase (t1/2β), volume of distribution during the postdistributive phase (Vdβ) and during steady state (Vdss) were determined as well as the body (ClS) and renal (ClR) clearances of M. Pronounced differences in Vdβ and Vdss were found between the two groups. The therapeutic failures had a smaller Vdβ and Vdss 3.09±0.96 l/kg and 2.74±0.96 l/kg vs 4.56±1.00 l/kg and 4.20±0.78 l/kg in the control group. The differences were due to changes between the groups in the volume of the central compartment. Differences between the groups were also found in t1/2β — 24.5±2.6 h in the therapeutic failures and 34.0±7.0 h (p<0.001) in the comparison group. However, the change in t1/2β was probably a consequence of the change in Vdβ, as the body clearance of M was similar in the two groups — 104±36 ml/min vs 111±36 ml/min. The smaller volume of distribution could lead to unacceptably high fluctuation of M in the central compartment, and withdrawal symptoms during the latter part of the dosage interval. The appropriate treatment of this subgroup of patients on methadone treatment is not to increase the dose but to shorten the dosage interval. Alternatively, a longer-acting opiate, such as 1-α-acetylmethadol (LAAM), may be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gunne L-M, Grönbladh L (1981) The Swedish methadone maintenance program. A controlled study. Drug Alcohol Depend 7: 249–256

    Google Scholar 

  2. Horns WH, Rado M, Goldstein A (1973) Plasma levels and symptoms complaints in patients maintained on daily dosage of methadone hydrochloride. Clin Pharmacol Ther 17: 636–649

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holmstrand J, Änggård E, Gunne L-M (1978) Methadone maintenance: Plasma levels and therapeutic outcome. Clin Pharmacol Ther 23: 175–180

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nilsson M-I, Änggård E, Holmstrand J, Gunne L-M (1982) Pharmacokinetics of methadone in methadone maintenance treatment: Adaptive changes during the induction phase. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 22: 343–349

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sullivan HR, Marshall FJ, McMahon RE, Änggård E, Holmstrand J, Gunne L-M (1975) Massfragmentographic determination of unlabeled and deuterium labeled methadone in human plasma. Possibilities for measurements of steady state pharmacokinetics. Biomed Mass Spectrosc 2: 197–200

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nilsson, M.I., Grönbladh, L., Widerlöv, E. et al. Pharmacokinetics of methadone in methadone maintenance treatment: Characterization of therapeutic failures. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 25, 497–501 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00542117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00542117

Key words

Navigation