Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 153–179

Logic of paradox revisited

  • Graham Priest
Article

DOI: 10.1007/BF00453020

Cite this article as:
Priest, G. J Philos Logic (1984) 13: 153. doi:10.1007/BF00453020

Conclusion

If, to return to the image with which I started this paper we consider the path of papers written on the logical paradoxes, then there is much to be learnt from the more recent additions, those by Chihara, Dowden and Woodruff included. However, the case for the paraconsistent approach to the paradoxes has not been weakened. In fact, it seems to me to have been strengthened. If we consider the path of papers, not as a signle line, but branching according to the approach to the paradoxes advocated, then the “Logic of Paradox” would, I still submit, be on the right track.

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Priest
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia