Development of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL TM) Instrument
Received: 12 August 1994 Accepted: 01 September 1994 DOI:
Cite this article as: Hays, R.D., Kallich, J.D., Mapes, D.L. et al. Qual Life Res (1994) 3: 329. doi:10.1007/BF00451725 Abstract
This paper describes the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL
TM) Instrument (dialysis version), a self-report measure that includes a 36-item health survey as the generic core, supplemented with multi-item scales targeted at particular concerns of individuals with kidney disease and on dialysis (symptom/problems, effects of kidney disease on daily life, burden of kidney disease, cognitive function, work status, sexual function, quality of social interaction, sleep). Also included were multi-item measures of social support, dialysis staff encouragement and patient satisfaction, and a single-item overall rating of health. The KDQOL TM was administered to 165 individuals with kidney disease (52% female; 48% male; 47% White; 27% African-American; 11% Hispanic; 8% Asian; 4% Native American; and 3% other ethnicities), sampled from nine different outpatient dialysis centres located in Southern California, the Northwest, and the Midwest. The average age of the sample was 53 years (range from 22 to 87), and 10% were 75 years or older. Internal consistency reliability estimates for the 19 multi-item scales exceeded 0.75 for every measure except one. The mean scores for individuals in this sample on the 36-item health scales were lower than the general population by one-quarter (emotional well-being) to a full standard deviation (physical function, role limitations due to physical health, general health), but similar to scores for dialysis patients in other studies. Correlations of the KDQOL TM scales with number of hospital days in the last 6 months were statistically significant ( p<0.05) for 14 of the 19 scales and number of medications currently being taken for nine of the scales. Results of this study provide support for the reliability and validity of the KDQOL TM. Key words Dialysis end stage renal disease kidney disease instrument development quality of life
Development of the KDQOL measure was supported in part by a subgrant from the University of Arizona to RAND and an unrestricted research grant from Amgen to RAND. The measures weee developed for use in the
Enhancing the Role of Pharmacists in the Care of Chronic Dialysis Patients Through the Use of Computer-modeled Algorithms for Epogen Dosing research project sponsored by Amgen through a grant to the University of Arizona (S. J. Coons, PI). A copy of the measures can be obtained from RAND free of charge. References
Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, Wells K, Rogers WH, Berry SD, McGlynn EA, Ware JE. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions: results from the Medical Outcomes Study.
J Am Med Assoc
Consensus Development Conference Panel, Morbidity and Mortality of Renal Dialysis: an NIH Consensus Conference statement.
Ann Internal Med 1994; 121: 62–70.
Proceedings from the conference on measuring, managing, and improving quality in the end-stage renal disease treatment setting.
Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24: 228–388.
Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.
USA Renal Data System, USRDS 1993 Annual Data Report. The National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, March 1993.
Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection.
Hays RD, Hayashi T. Beyond internal consistency reliability: rationale and User's Guide for Multitrait Scaling Analysis Program on the microcomputer.
Behav Res Meth Instruments Computers
Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B.
SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide
. Boston, Massachusetts: The Health Institute, 1993.
McHorney CA, Ware JE, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JFR. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts.
McHorney CA, WareJr. JE, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): IIL Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and validity among diverse patient groups.
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
. Newbury Park: Sage, 1988.
Kurtin PS, Davies AR, Meyer KB, DeGiacomo JM, Kantz ME. Patient-based health status measures in outpatient dialysis: early experiences in developing an outcomes assessment program.
Kurtin P, Nissenson AR. Variation in end-stage renal disease patient outcomes: What we know what should we know, and how do we find it out?
J Am Soc Nephrol
Kutner NC, Brogran D, Kutner MH. End-stage renal disease treatment modality and patients' quality of life.
Am J Nephrol
Laupacis A, Wong C, Churchill D, and the Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group. The use of generic and specific quality-of-life measures in hemodialysis patients treated with erythropoietin.
Control Clin Trials
Levin NW, Lazarus JM, Nissenson AR. Maximizing patient benefits with epoetin alfa therapy: national cooperative rHu erythropoietin study in patients with chronic renal failure—an interim report.
Am J Kidney Dis
Whittington R, Barradell LB, Benfield P. Epoetin: A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic renal failure and its effects on quality of life.
Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.
Stewart AL, Ware JE, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. Psychological distress/well-being and cognitive functioning measures. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE, eds.
Measuring Functioning and Well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach
Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992: 102–42.
Jette AM, Davies AR, Cleary PD, Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Fink A, Kosecoff J, Young RT, Brook RH, Delbanco TL. The functional status questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care.
J Gen Internal Med
Sherbourne CD. Social functioning: sexual problems measures. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE, eds.
Measuring Functioning and Well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach
. Durhan, NC: Duke University Press, 1992: 194–204.
Devinsky O, Vickery BG, Cramer J, Perrine K, Hermann B, Meador K, Hays RD. Development of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLTE) Inventory, submitted for publication.
Coulter ID, Hays RD, Danielson C. The Chiropractic Satisfaction Questionnaire.
Topics in Clinical Chiropractic, in press.
Hays RD, Stewart AL, Sherbourne CD, Marshall GN. The ‘states versus weights’ dilemma in quality of life measurement.
Qual Life Res
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.
Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki DA. tPsychometric evaluation and interpretation of health-related quality of life data. In: Schumaker S, Berzon R, eds.
The International Assessment of Health-related Quality of Life: Theory, Translation, Measurement and Analysis. Oxford, England: Rapid Communications, in press.
Guttman LA. Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis.
Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors.
Multivariate Behav Res
Montanelli RD, Humphreys LG. Latent roots of random data correlation matrices with squared multiple correlations on the diagonal: a Monte Carlo study.
Hendrickson AE, White PO. PROMAX: a quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure.
Br J Stat Psychol
Liang MH, Larson MG, Cullen KE, Schwartz JA. Comparative measurement and efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.
Nerenz DR, Repasky DP, Whitehouse F, Kahkomen DM. Ongoing assessment of health status in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Shekelle P, Hays RD, Kallich JD.
Quality of Life of Veterans with COPD/Asthma: Project Memorandum
. RAND: Santa Monica, CA, 1994.
Applied Factor Analysis
. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Hays RD, Marshall GN, Wang EYI, Sherbourne CD. Four-year cross-lagged associations between physical and mental health in the Medical Outcomes Study.
J Consult Clin Psychol
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd 1994