AllsopT. & WoolnoughB.: 1990, ‘The Relationship of Technology to Science in English Schools’, Journal of Curriculum Studies
AndersonH. A. & OlstadH.: 1971, ‘American Industry — A New Direction for Industrial Arts’, Man Society Technology
AnyonJ.: 1988, ‘Schools as Agencies of Social Legitimization’, in W. F.Pinar (ed.), Contemporary Curriculum Discourses, Gorsuch Scarisbrick, Scottsdale, AZ, pp. 175–200.
AppleM. W.: 1982, Education and Power, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston.
BarnettM.: 1992, ‘Technology, within the National Curriculum and Elsewhere’, in JohnBeynon & HughieMackay (eds.), Technological Literacy and the Curriculum, The Falmer Press, Basingstoke, Great Britain, pp. 84–102.
BeckR. H.: 1991, General Education: Vocational and Academic Collaboration, National Center for Research in Vocational Education, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
BeckwithG. V.: 1989, ‘Science, Technology, and Society: Considerations of Method’, Science, Technology & Human Values
BourdieuP.: 1971, ‘Intellectual Field and Creative Project’, in M. F. D.Young (ed.), Knowledge and Control, Collier-MacMillan, London, pp. 161–188.
Congress of the United States of America: 1994, School to Work Opportunities Act of 1994, Washington DC.
CrossleyM. & VulliamyG.: 1984, ‘Case-Study Research Methods and Comparative Education’, Comparative Education
Department for Education: 1990 Technology in the National Curriculum, HMSO.
Department for Education: 1995, Design and Technology in the National Curriculum, HMSO.
De Vore, P. W.: 1967, ‘Curricular Considerations — Oswego’, Final Report to the U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, Office of Education, ERIC Document ED 016 069.
DuggerW. E.Jr.: 1995, ‘Technology for All Americans’, The Technology Teacher
DuggerW. E.Jr., FrenchB. J., PeckhamS. & StarkweatherK. N.: 1991, ‘Sixth Annual Survey of the Profession’. The Technology Teacher
EgglestonJ.: 1977, The Sociology of the School Curriculum, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston.
Epstein, E. H.: 1990, ‘The Problematic Meaning of “Comparison” in Comparative Education’, in J. S. Schriewer & B. Holmes (eds.) Theories and Methods in Comparative Education, pp. 3–23.
Gagel, C.: 1995, Technological Literacy: A Critical Exposition and Interpretation for the Study of Technology in the General Curriculum, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1995.
GoodladJ. I.: 1984, A Place Called School, McGraw-Hill, New York.
GuthrieJ. W. & PierceL. C.: 1990, ‘The International Economy and National Education Reform: A Comparison of Education Reforms in the United States and Great Britain’, Oxford Review of Education
HalesJ. A. SnyderJ. F.: 1981a, ‘Jackson's Mill Industrial Arts Curriculum Theory: A Base for Curriculum Derivation’, Man Society Technology
HalesJ. A. & SnyderJ. F.: 1981b ‘Jackson's Mill Curriculum Theory: A Base for Curriculum Conceptualization’, Man Society Technology
HannahL.: 1987, ‘Human Capital’, Oxford Review of Education
13, 177–181. Her Majesty's stationery Office (1990). Technology in the National Curriculum. Department for Education, (Author).
HerschbachD.: 1995, ‘Technology as Knowledge: Implication for Instruction’, Journal of Technology Education
HirschE. D.Jr.: 1988, Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, Vintage Books, New York, NY.
HirstP. H.: 1972, ‘Liberal Education and the Nature of Knowledge’, in R. F.Dearden, P. H.Hirst, & R. S.Peters (eds.), Education and Reason, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
HodgkinR. A.: 1990, ‘Techne, Technology and Inventiveness’, Oxford Review of Education, 16, 207–217.
JohnsonJ. R.: 1989, Technology: Report of the Project 2061 Phase I Technology Panel, (American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC).
KimC. & LandM. H.: 1994, ‘Recent Development of Technology Education in Korea’. The Technology Teacher
Kimbell, R.: 1993, Technology in the School Curriculum, a report prepared for the Office of Technology Assessment Congress of the United States of America, Goldsmith's College, University of London, London.
LaytonD.: 1993, Technology's Challenge to Science Education, Buckingham, Open University Press.
LaytonD.: 1995, ‘Constructing and reconstructing school technology in England and Wales’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education
5, pp. 89–118.
LewisT.: 1991, ‘Introducing Technology into School Curricula’, Journal of Curriculum Studies
LewisT. & GagelC.: 1992, ‘Technological Literacy: A Critical Analysis’, Journal of Curriculum Studies
LewisT.: 1994, ‘Limits on Change to Technology Education Curriculum’, Journal of Industrial Teacher Education
LewisT.: 1995, ‘From Manual Training to Technology Education: The Continuing Struggle to Establish a School Subject in the U.S.A.’, Journal of Curriculum Studies
LewisT.: 1996, ‘Accommodating Border Crossings’, Journal of Industrial Teacher Education
LewisT.: (1995), ‘Including Technology in the Curriculum of Developing Countries’, Canadian and International Education
LiaoT.: 1994, ‘Toward Technological Literacy for All’, The Technology Teacher
LindbladS.: 1990, ‘From Technology to Craft: on Teachers' Experimental Adoption of Technology as a New Subject in the Swedish Primary School’, Journal of Curriculum Studies
McCormickR.: 1992, ‘The Evolution of Current Practice in Technology Education — Part 1’, The Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau
McCormickR.: 1993, ‘The Evolution of Current Practice of Technology Education — Part 2: Issues’, The Journal of Technology Studies
MedwayP.: 1992, ‘Constructions of Technology: Reflections on a New Subject’, in JohnBeynon & HughieMackay (eds.), Technology Literacy and the Curriculum, The Falmer Press, Basingstoke, Great Britain, pp. 63–83.
MurataS. & SternS.: 1993, ‘Technology Education in Japan’, Journal of Technology Education
National Commission on Excellence in Education: 1983, A National at Risk: The Imperative for Reform, U.S. Department of Education, Washington DC.
NowakS.: 1977, ‘The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory’, in A.Szalai and R.Petrella (eds.), Cross-National Comparative Survey Research: Theory and Practice, New York, Pergammon Press.
OakesJ.: 1985, Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality, Yale University Press, New Haven CT.
OkuyaT., MiyakayaH., HatanoY. & KadowakiT.: 1993, ‘The New National Curriculum of Technology Education in Japan’, 53(2), 24–27.
RappF.: 1989, ‘General Perspectives on the Complexity of Philosophy of Technology’, in Paul T.Durbin (ed.) Philosophy of Technology: Practical, Historical and Other Dimensions, Philosophy and Technology, 6 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).
ReidW. A.: 1988, ‘The Technological Society and the Concept of General Education’, in I.Westbury & A.Purves (eds.) Cultural Literacy and the Idea of General Education, Eighty-seventh Yearbook of the National Society of the Study of Education (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois).
SavageE. & SterryL.: 1990a, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education’, The Technology Teacher
SavageE. & SterryL.: 1990b, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education’, The Technology Teacher
Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills: 1991, What Work Requires of Schools — A SCANS Report for America 2000, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington DC.
SchwabJ. J.: 1962, ‘The Concept of the Structure of a Discipline’, Educational Record
Towers, E. R., Lux, D. G. & Ray, W. E.: 1966, A Rationale and Structure for Industrial Arts Subject Matter. A joint project of the Ohio State University and the University of Illinois. US Office of Education, Bureau of Adult and Vocational Research, ERIC Document No. ED 013 955.
WarnerW. E.: 1947, 1965, A Curriculum to Reflect Technology, Epsilon Pi Tau Inc., Columbus, Ohio.
WinnerL.: 1993, ‘Upon Opening up the Black Box and Finding it Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology’, Science, Technology & Human Values