Skip to main content
Log in

The prospects for an evolutionary psychology: Human language and human reasoning

Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary psychology purports to explain human capacities as adaptations to an ancestral environment. A complete explanation of human language or human reasoning as adaptations depends on assessing an historical claim, that these capacities evolved under the pressure of natural selection and are prevalent because they provided systematic advantages to our ancestors. An outline of the character of the information needed in order to offer complete adaptation explanations is drawn from Robert Brandon (1990), and explanations offered for the evolution of language and reasoning within evolutionary psychology are evaluated. Pinker and Bloom's (1992) defense of human language as an adaptation for verbal communication, Robert Nozick's (1993) account of the evolutionary origin of rationality, and Cosmides and Tooby's (1992) explanation of human reasoning as an adaptation for social exchange, are discussed in light of what is known, and what is not known, about the history of human evolution. In each case, though a plausible case is made that these capacities are adaptations, there is not enough known to offer even a semblance of an explanation of the origin of these capacities. These explanations of the origin of human thought and language are simply speculations lacking the kind of detailed historical information required for an evolutionary explanation of an adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AntonovicsJ., A. D.Bradshaw, and R. G.Turner (1971), ‘Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants,’Advances in Ecological Research 7, 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • AntonovicsJ., and A. D.Bradshaw (1970), ‘Evolution in Closely Adjacent Plant Populations. VII. Clinal Patterns at a Mine Boundary,’Heredity 25, 349–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarkowJ. H., L.Cosmides and J.Tooby, eds. (1992),The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BrandonR. (1978). ‘Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory,’Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology 9, 181–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • BrandonR. (1990),Adaptation and Environment, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BurianR. (1983), ‘Adaptation,’ in M.Grene, ed.,Dimensions of Darwinism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 287–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChomskyN. (1972),Language and Mind, New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, enlarged edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • CosmidesL. and J.Tooby (1987), ‘From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link,’ in J.Dupré, ed.,The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality (Cambridge: M.I.T. Press), pp. 277–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • CosmidesL., and J.Tooby (1992), ‘Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange,’ in BarkowJ. H., L.Cosmides and J.Tooby, eds.,The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 163–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • DarwinC. (1859),On the Origin of Species. A Facsimile of the First Edition, edited with an introduction by Ernst Mayr, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaviesP. S., J. H.Fetzer and T. R.Foster (1995), ‘Logical Reasoning and Domain Specificity,’Biology and Philosophy 10, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • DayT., J.Pritchard, and D.Schluter (1994), ‘A Comparison of Two Sticklebacks,’Evolution 48, 1723–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. W. (1992a), ‘The Human Brain,’ in Jones, Martin and Pilbeam (1992), pp. 115–123.

  • Deacon, T. W. (1992b), ‘Biological Aspects of Language,’ in Jones, Martin and Pilbeam (1992), pp. 128–33.

  • GouldS. J. (1987),An Urchin in the Storm, New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • JainS. K., and A. D.Bradshaw (1966), ‘Evolutionary Divergence among Adjacent Plant Populations. I. The Evidence and Its Theoretical Analysis,’Heredity 21, 407–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • JonesS., R.Martin, and D.Pilbeam, eds. (1992),The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LevinsR. (1963), ‘Theory of Fitness in a Heterogeneous Environment. II. Developmental Flexibility and Niche Selection,’American Naturalist 97, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • LevinsR. (1968),Evolution in a Changing Environment, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LewontinR. C. (1957), ‘The Adaptation of Populations to Varying Environments,’Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22, 395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • LewontinR. C. (1974), ‘The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes,’The American Journal of Human Genetics 26, 400–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • LewontinR. C. (1982),Human Diversity, New York and San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • LewontinR. C. (1990), ‘The Evolution of Cognition,’ in D. N.Osherson and E. E.Smith, eds.,An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Thinking (Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, first edition), pp. 229–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • LiebermanP. (1992), ‘Human Speech and Language,’ in JonesS., R.Martin, and D.Pilbeam, eds.,The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 134–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNairM. (1979), ‘The Genetics of Copper Tolerance in the Yellow Monkey Flower,Mimulus guttatus. I. Crosses to Nontolerants,’Genetics 91, 553–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • NozickR. (1993),The Nature of Rationality, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PinkerS. (1994),The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language, New York: William Morrow & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • PinkerS., and P.Bloom (1992), ‘Natural Language and Natural Selection,’ in BarkowJ. H., L.Cosmides and J.Tooby, eds.,The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 451–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • SultanS. E., and F. A.Bazzaz (1993a), ‘Phenotypic Plasticity inPolygonum persicaria. I. Diversity and Uniformity in Genotypic Norms of Reaction to Light,’Evolution 47, 1009–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • SultanS. E., and F. A.Bazzaz (1993b), ‘Phenotypic Plasticity inPolygonum persicaria. II. Norms of Reaction to Soil Moisture and the Maintenance of Genetic Diversity,’Evolution 47, 1032–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • SultanS. E., and F. A.Bazzaz (1993c), ‘Phenotypic Plasticity inPolygonum persicaria. III. The Evolution of Ecological Breadth for Nutrient Requirement,’Evolution 47, 1009–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • ToobyJ. and L.Cosmides (1992a), ‘The Psychological Foundations of Culture,’ in BarkowJ. H., L.Cosmides and J.Tooby, eds.,The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, (1992), pp. 19–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • WilliamsG. C. (1966),Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton: Princeton Unviersity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, R.C. The prospects for an evolutionary psychology: Human language and human reasoning. Mind Mach 6, 541–557 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389658

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389658

Key words

Navigation