Mathematical statistics and metastatistical analysis
- Andrés Rivadulla
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper deals with meta-statistical questions concerning frequentist statistics. In Sections 2 to 4 I analyse the dispute between Fisher and Neyman on the so called logic of statistical inference, a polemic that has been concomitant of the development of mathematical statistics. My conclusion is that, whenever mathematical statistics makes it possible to draw inferences, it only uses deductive reasoning. Therefore I reject Fisher's inductive approach to the statistical estimation theory and adhere to Neyman's deductive one. On the other hand, I assert that Neyman-Pearson's testing theory, as well as Fisher's tests of significance, properly belong to decision theory, not to logic, neither deductive nor inductive. I then also disagree with Costantini's view of Fisher's testing model as a theory of hypothetico-deductive inferences.
In Section 5 I disapprove Hacking1's evidentialists criticisms of the Neyman-Pearson's theory of statistics (NPT), as well as Hacking2's interpretation of NPT as a theory of probable inference. In both cases Hacking misses the point. I conclude, by claiming that Mayo's conception of the Neyman-Pearson's testing theory, as a model of learning from experience, does not purport any advantages over Neyman's behavioristic model.
- Birnbaum, A.: 1977, ‘The Neyman-Pearson Theory as Decision Theory, and as Inference Theory; With a Criticism of the Lindley-Savage Argument for Bayesian Theory’, Synthese 36, 19–49.
- Costantini, D.: 1987, ‘Abductive Inferences’, Erkenntnis 26, 409–422.
- Costantini, D. and Galavotti, M. C.: 1986, ‘Induction and Deduction in Statistical Analysis’, Erkenntnis 24, 73–94.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1922, ‘On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 222, 309–368.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1925a, ‘Theory of Statistical Estimation’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society XXII, 700–725.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1925b, Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1930, ‘Inverse Probability’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society XXVI, 528–535.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1932, ‘Inverse Probability and the Use of Likelihood’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society XXVIII, 257–261.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1934, ‘Two New Properties of Mathematical Likelihood’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 144, 285–307.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1935a, The Design of Experiments, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1935b, ‘The Logic of Inductive Inference’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 98, 39–82.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1955, ‘Statistical Methods and Scientific Induction’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 17, 69–78.
- Fisher, R. A.: 1956, Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
- Hacking, I.: 1965, Logic of Statistical Inference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Hacking, I.: 1973, ‘Propensities, Statistic and Inductive Logic’, in P., Suppes et. al. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.
- Hacking, I.: 1980, ‘The Theory of Probable Inference: Neyman, Peirce and Braithwaite’, in D. H., Mellor (ed.) Science, Belief and Behavior, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Johnstone, D. J.: 1987, ‘Tests of Significance Following R. A. Fisher’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 38, 481–499.
- Mayo, D.: 1982, ‘On After-Trial Criticisms of Neyman-Pearson Theory of Statistics’, in P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.), PSA 1982, East Lansing, Michigan.
- Mayo, D.: 1983, ‘An Objective Theory of Statistical Testing’, Synthese 57, 297–340.
- Mayo, D.: 1985, ‘Behavioristic, Evidentialist and Learning Models of Statistical Testing’, Philosophy of Science 52, 493–516.
- Neyman, J.: 1934, ‘On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 97, 558–625.
- Neyman, J.: 1937, ‘Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 767.
- Neyman, J.: 1938, ‘L'Estimation Statistique Traitée Comme un Probleme Classique de Probabilité’, Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles 739, VI, 25–57.
- Neyman, J.: 1950, First Course in Probability and Statistics, Constable and Co. Ltd., London.
- Neyman, J.: 1952, Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Graduate School, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.
- Neyman, J.: 1977, ‘Frequentist Probability and Frequentist Statistics’, Synthese 36, 97–131.
- Neyman, J. and Pearson, E. S.: 1933, ‘On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 231, 289–337.
- Mathematical statistics and metastatistical analysis
Volume 34, Issue 2 , pp 211-236
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Andrés Rivadulla (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Departamento de Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad Complutense, E-28040, Madrid, Spain