Rights in the workplace: A Nozickian argument
- Ian Maitland
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There is a growing literature that attempts to define the substantive rights of employees in the workplace, a.k.a. the duties of employers toward their employees. Following Nozick, this article argues that — so long as there is a competitive labor market — to set up a class of moral rights in the workplace invades workers' rights to freely choose the terms and conditions of employment they judge best.
- Birch, David: 1981, ‘Who creates jobs?’, Public Interest (vol. 65), fall.
- Donaldson, Thomas: 1982, Corporations and Morality (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).
- Frank, Robert: 1985, Choosing the Right Pond (Oxford University Press, New York).
- Goldman, Alan: 1980, ‘Business ethics: profits, utilities, and moral rights’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, no. 3.
- McKenzie, Robert: 1981, ‘The case for plant closures’, Policy Review 15, winter.
- Nozick, Robert: 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).
- Schwartz, Adina: 1984, ‘Autonomy in the workplace’, in Tom Regan, ed., Just Business (Random House, N.Y.).
- Werhane, Patricia H.: 1985, Persons, Rights and Corporations (Prentice Hall, N.Y.).
- Williamson, Oliver E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, N.Y.).
- Rights in the workplace: A Nozickian argument
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 8, Issue 12 , pp 951-954
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Ian Maitland (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Minnesota, 55455, Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.