Business ethics, ideology, and the naturalistic fallacy
- Kenneth E. Goodpaster
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper addresses the relationship between theoretical and applied ethics. It directs philosophical attention toward the concept of ‘ideology’, conceived as a bridge between high-level principles and decision-making practice. How are we to understand this bridge and how can we avoid the naturalistic fallacy while taking ideology seriously?
It is then suggested that the challenge posed by ideology in the arena of organizational ethics is in many ways similar to the challenge posed by developmentalist accounts of moral ‘stages’ in the arena of individual ethics, namely, how to account for the normative force of frameworks that are theoretically derivative yet practically essential.
- Heilbroner, Robert: 1974, An Inquiry into the Human Prospect, Norton, New York.
- Heilbroner, Robert: 1976, Business Civilization in Decline, Norton, New York.
- Kohlberg, Lawrence: 1981, The Philosophy of Moral Development, Harper & Row, San Francisco.
- Lodge, George: 1979, The New American Ideology, Knopf, New York, 1979.
- Maccoby, Michael: 1976, The Gamesman, Simon and Schuster, New York.
- Maccoby, Michael: 1981, The Leader, Simon and Schuster, New York.
- Novak, Michael: 1982, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, Simon and Schuster, New York.
- Petit, Thomas: 1967, The Moral Crisis in Management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Stone, Christopher: 1975, Where the Law Ends, Harper & Row, New York.
- Business ethics, ideology, and the naturalistic fallacy
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 4, Issue 4 , pp 227-232
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Kenneth E. Goodpaster (1) (2)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Dept. of Mathematics, University of Notre Dame, USA
- 2. Dept. of Philosophy, University of Michigan, USA