Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 121–163

Two types of donkey sentences

  • Lisa L. S. Cheng
  • C. T. James Huang
Article

DOI: 10.1007/BF00355411

Cite this article as:
Cheng, L.L.S. & Huang, C.T.J. Natural Language Semantics (1996) 4: 121. doi:10.1007/BF00355411

Abstract

Mandarin Chinese exhibits two paradigms of conditionals with indefinite wh-words that have the semantics of donkey sentences, represented by ‘bare conditionals’ on the one hand and ruguo- and dou-conditionals on the other. The bare conditionals require multiple occurrences of wh-words, disallowing the use of overt or covert anaphoric elements in the consequent clause, whereas the ruguo- and dou-conditionals present a completely opposite pattern. We argue that the bare conditionals are cases of unselective binding par excellence (Heim 1982, Kamp 1981) while the ruguo- and dou-conditionals are most naturally accounted for with the traditional E-type pronoun strategy of Evans (1980). We thus argue partly for a return to the E-type strategy (along with Heim 1990) but maintain the need for unselective binding in UG (cf. Kratzer 1989, Chierchia 1992). It is further shown that these two paradigms do not differ with respect to the proportion problem and the distribution of symmetric and asymmetric readings of Kadmon (1987), though they differ with respect to ∀ and ∃ readings (discussed in Chierchia 1992) in a non-trivial way that provides further support for the proposed approach. Finally, evidence is given that the bare conditionals should be kept apart from correlative constructions in languages like Hindi, and treated differently from the latter.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa L. S. Cheng
    • 1
  • C. T. James Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA