Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 413–457

A unified analysis of the English bare plural

Authors

  • Greg N. Carlson
    • South CollegeUniversity of Massachusetts
Article

DOI: 10.1007/BF00353456

Cite this article as:
Carlson, G.N. Linguistics and Philosophy (1977) 1: 413. doi:10.1007/BF00353456

Abstract

It is argued that the English ‘bare plural’ (an NP with plural head that lacks a determiner), in spite of its apparently diverse possibilities of interpretation, is optimally represented in the grammar as a unified phenomenon. The chief distinction to be dealt with is that between the ‘generic’ use of the bare plural (as in ‘Dogs bark’) and its existential or ‘indefinite plural’ use (as in ‘He threw oranges at Alice’). The difference between these uses is not to be accounted for by an ambiguity in the NP itself, but rather by explicating how the context of the sentence acts on the bare plural to give rise to this distinction. A brief analysis is sketched in which bare plurals are treated in all instances as proper names of kinds of things. A subsidiary argument is that the null determiner is not to be regarded as the plural of the indefinite article a.

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1977