, Volume 107, Issue 2, pp 257–264

Nested subset structure of larval mycophagous fly assemblages: nestedness in a non-island system


    • Biology DepartmentFurman University
  • M. Lisa Carswell
    • Biology DepartmentFurman University
  • Kimberly A. Kelly
    • Biology DepartmentFurman University
Community Ecology

DOI: 10.1007/BF00327910

Cite this article as:
Worthen, W.B., Carswell, M.L. & Kelly, K.A. Oecologia (1996) 107: 257. doi:10.1007/BF00327910


Nested subset structure has been studied in archipelagoes and fragmented habitats, and has been attributed to differential colonization and extinction rates among species and nested environmental tolerances. In this experiment, we tested for nestedness in assemblages of mycophagous fly larvae. Twenty mushrooms in each of three size classes (4.8–6.0 g, 10–15 g, 21–32 g) were placed on moist potting soil in experimental cups. The cups were placed in oak and pine forests in Greenville, S.C., USA for 5 days, where they were available to ovipositing flies. Upon collection, the mushrooms were incubated in the laboratory for 3 weeks and all emerging flies were sorted by species, counted, and weighed. A random placement analysis was conducted to determine whether the species richness pattern was a sampling artifact of the species abundance distributions. The actual species richness pattern did not conform to the random placement model; most mushrooms contained significantly fewer species than predicted by random sampling. The communities were strongly nested as measured by two different indices, and the nestedness pattern was related to mushroom size. Small mushrooms usually produced no flies or a single species, Dohrniphora sp. (Phoridae). Medium and large mushrooms typically produced more species-rich communities that usually contained the phorid and Drosophila putrida, D. tripunctata, and Leucophenga varia. This core guild was nested within a more diverse assemblage that included D. falleni, Mycodrosophila dimidiata, a muscid, and two Leptocera sp. (sphaeroceridae). These patterns are tentatively explained in the context of nested desiccation tolerances, mediated by differences in mushroom size.

Key words

Nested subsetsDrosophilaCommunity structureSpecies-area relationships

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996