Methodological research in the swedish surveys of living conditions
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In Sweden, surveys of living conditions have passed through the initial stages. We have been able to provide rough and broad descriptions of the health situation in different respects, housing standards within different population subgroups, distributions of income etc. Often the surveys, in Sweden as well as in other countries, have kept an acceptable standard with regard to sampling and non-response. However, regardless of whether the aim of the surveys is to supply relatively superficial statistics for official use or statistics for analytic research, a better control of measurement quality is needed. In this paper we present a summary of about ten years of methodological work conducted by Statistics Sweden on the Surveys of Living Conditions.
- AndersenR., KasperJ., FrankelM. R., and associates: 1979, Total Survey Error (Jossey Bass Publications, New York).
- BergmanL. R., HanveR. and RappJ.: 1978, ‘Why do some people refuse to participate in interview surveys?’, Statistisk Tidskrift (Statistical Review) 5, pp. 341–356.
- BergmanL. R. and ThorslundM.: 1980, ‘Response quality in the Swedish labour force surveys’, Methodological Studies from the Research Institute for Statistics on Living Conditions 13 (Statistics Sweden, Stockholm).
- Bergman, L. R. and Wärneryd, B.: 1982, ‘Om datainsamling i surveyundersökningar. Vilken metod är bäst och vad får vi egentligen veta?’, Liber, Stockholm (‘On data collection in surveys. Which method is best and what do we really get to know?’ in Swedish).
- BidermanA. D. and DruryT. F. (eds.): 1976, Measuring Work Quality for Social Reporting (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
- Brooks, C. A. and Bailar, B. A.: 1978, ‘An error profile: employment as measured by the current population survey, Statistical Policy Working Paper 3, U.S. Department of Commerce.
- Brorsson, B.: 1980, ‘Mätfel i hälsointervjuer. Litteraturöversikt och studier av intervjuareffekter’, Statistics Sweden (Doctoral Dissertation: ‘Measurement errors in interviews on health. A literature review and a study of interviewer effects’, in Swedish, with an English summary).
- Cannel, C. F., Marquis, K. H. and Laurent, A.: ‘A summary of studies of interviewing methodology’, Vital and Health Statistics — Series 2, No. 69 (National Center for Health Statistics).
- CollinsM.: 1980, ‘Interviewer variability: a review of the problem’, Journal of the Market Research Society 22, No. 3, pp. 77–95.
- ConverseJ. M.: 1976, ‘Predicting no opinion in the polls’, Public Opinion Quarterly 40, pp. 515–530.
- Office for Population Censuses and Surveys (OPCS): 1973, The General Household Survey — Introductory Report (OPCS, London, HMSO).
- Hochstim, J. R. and Renne, K. S.: 1971, ‘Reliability of response in a sociomedical population study’, Public Opinion Quarterly, pp. 69–79.
- HuntS. D., SparkmanR. D. and WilcoxJ. B.: 1982, ‘The pretest in survey research: issues and preliminary findings’, Journal of Marketing Research 19, pp. 269–293.
- Lindström, H.: 1983, ‘Non-response errors in sample surveys’, Statistics Sweden.
- Lindström, H., Thorslund, M. and Wärneryd, B.: 1981, ‘Förändringsskattningar i undersökningarna av levnadsförhållanden (ULF). En redovisning av metostudier och rekommendered metodik’, Levnadsförhållanden, Sveriges Officiella Statistik, Stockholm (‘Estimating change in the Surveys of Living Conditions. Methodological Studies and Recommendations’, in Swedish).
- LitwakE.: 1956, ‘A classification of biased questions’, American Journal of Sociology 62, No. 2, pp. 182–186.
- MartinJ. and ButcherB.: 1982, ‘The quality of proxy information — some results from a large-scale study’, The Statistican 31, No. 4, pp. 293–319.
- MolenaarN. J.: 1982, ‘Non-experimental research on the effects of the wording of questions in survey interviews’, Quality and Quantity 16, pp. 69–90.
- NCHS (National Center for Health Statistics): 1973, ‘Quality control and measurement of non-sampling errors in the health interview survey’, Dew Publication No. (HSM) 73-1328.
- SchreiberE. M.: 1975–76, ‘Dirty data in Britain and the U.S.A.: the reliability of “invariant” characteristics reported in surveys’, Public Opinion Quarterly 39, pp. 493–506.
- SlettoR. F.: 1940, ‘Pretesting of questionnaires’, American Sociological Review 5, pp. 193–200.
- Statistics, Sweden: Living Conditions Series, Appendices 1(1975), 2(1975), 3(1977), 4(1980), 6(1983), (in Swedish).
- Sudman, S.: 1982, ‘Discussion on Kalton, G. and Schuman, H.: The effect of the question on survey responses: a review’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, part 1, pp. 42–73.
- SudmanS. and BradburnN. M.: 1974, Response Effects in Surveys (Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago).
- Thorslund, M. and Wikman, A.: forthcoming, ‘Can working conditions and other aspects of level of living be studied by the help of survey questions?’, Stockholm.
- VogelJ.: 1981, ‘Social report on inequality in Sweden’, Living Conditions Series Report No. 27 (Official Statistics of Sweden, Stockholm).
- Vogel, J.: 1982, ‘The Swedish annual level of living surveys: social indicators and social reporting as an official statistics programme’, paper presented at the 10th World Congres of Sociology, Mexico City, 16–20 August, 1982 (obtainable from Statistics Sweden).
- Wärneryd, B.: 1983, ‘Methodological research in the Swedish level of living surveys. Problems of measurement and data collection’, Statistics Sweden (first draft).
- Methodological research in the swedish surveys of living conditions
Social Indicators Research
Volume 16, Issue 1 , pp 77-95
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors