Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions
 Ruhama Even
 … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discount
Rent now* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Get AccessAbstract
Interest in teachers' subject matter knowledge has arisen in recent years. But most of the analysis has been general and not topicspecific. This paper shows how one may approach the question of teachers' knowledge about mathematical topics. It demonstrates the building of an analytic framework of subject matter knowledge for teaching a specific topic in mathematics and then uses the concept of function to provide an illustrative case of a paradigm for analyzing subject matter knowledge for teaching. The choice of the aspects, which form the main facets of the framework, was based on integrated knowledge from several bodies of work: the role and importance of the topic in the discipline of mathematics and in the mathematics curriculum; research and theoretical work on learning, knowledge and understanding of mathematical concepts in general and the specific topic in particular; and research and theoretical work on teachers' subject matter knowledge and its role in teaching. An application of the framework in the case of the concept of function is described and illustrated by anecdotes drawn from a study of prospective secondary teachers' knowledge and understanding of functions.
 Teaching for transition from high school to college. College Entrance Examination Board, New York
 Ball, D. L. (1988) Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
 Ball, D. L. (1990) Examining the subject matter knowledge of prospective mathematics teachers'. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21: pp. 132143
 Ball, D. L.: In press, ‘Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter knowledge part of the equation’, in J. Brophy (ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching (Vol. 2), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
 Bell, A. W., Costello, J., Kuchemann, D. (1983) A Review of Research in Mathematics Education, Part A. NFERNELSON, Windsor, Canada
 Bell, A., Janvier, C. (1981) The interpretation of graphs representing situations. For the Learning of Mathematics 2: pp. 3442
 Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession: 1986, A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century, Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, Washington, DC.
 Chambers, D. L., Benson, J., Chandler, A., Bethke, E. (1986) A Guide to Curriculum Planning in Mathematics. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, Madison, WI
 Coxford, A. F., Payne, J. N. (1987) HBJ Algebra 1 Revised Edition. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., Orlando, Florida
 Davis, R. B. Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: A summary analysis. In: Hiebert, J. eds. (1986) Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 265300
 Dewey, J. The relation of theory to practice in education. In: Borrowman, M. L. eds. (1904) 1971, Teacher Education in America: A Documentary History. Teachers' College Press, New York, pp. 140171
 Dolciani, M. P., Sorgenfrey, R. H., Brown, R. G., Kane, R. B. (1986) Algebra and Trigonometry, Structure and Method Book 2. Houghton Mifflin Company, USA
 Dreyfus, T., Eisenberg, T. (1983) The function concept in college students: Linearity, smoothness and periodicity. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 5: pp. 119132
 Dreyfus, T. and Eisenberg, T.: 1987, ‘On the deep structure of functions’, in J. C. Bergeron and C. Kieren (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of PME, Vol. I, Montreal, Canada, pp. 190–196.
 DufourJanvier, B., Bednarz, N., Belanger, M. Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In: Janvier, C. eds. (1987) Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 109122
 Making Sense of the Future. Harvard Graduate School of Education, MA
 Eisenberg, T. and Dreyfus, T.: 1986, ‘On visual versus analytical thinking in mathematics’, Proceedings of PME 10, London, England.
 Even, R.: 1989, Prospective secondary teachers' knowledge and understanding about mathematical functions, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
 Freudenthal, H. (1983) Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht
 Greeno, J. G. (1978) Understanding and procedural knowledge in mathematics instruction. Educational Psychologist 12: pp. 262283
 Hershkowitz, R. Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In: Nesher, P., Kilpatrick, J. eds. (1990) Mathematics and Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
 Hiebert, J., Lefevre, P. Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In: Hiebert, J. eds. (1986) Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 127
 Tomorrow's Teacher. Michigan State University, College of Education, East Lansing, MI
 Janvier, C.: 1978, The interpretation of complex Cartesian graphs representing situations — Studies and teaching experiments, Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, Shell Centre for Mathematical Education and Universite du Quebec a Montreal.
 Keedy, M. L., Bittinger, M. L., Smith, S. A., Orfan, L. J. (1986) Algebra. AddisonWesley Publishing Company, Inc., USA
 Lampert, M.: 1988, ‘The teacher's role in reinventing the meaning of mathematical knowing in the classroom’, in M. J. Behr, C. B. Lacampagne and M. M. Wheeler (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of PMENA, DeKalb, Ill., pp. 433–480.
 Lappan, G., Even, R. (1989) Learning to Teach: Constructing Meaningful Understanding of Mathematical Content (Craft Paper 893). Michigan State University, National Center for Research of Teacher Education, East Lansing, MI
 Lappan, G., Schram, P. Communication and reasoning: Critical dimensions of sense making in mathematics. In: Trafton, P. R., Shulte, A. P. eds. (1989) New Directions for Elementary School Mathematics — 1989 Yearbook. NCTM, Reston, Virginia, pp. 1430
 Leinhardt, G., Smith, D. A. (1985) Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology 77: pp. 247271
 Lesh, R., Post, T., Behr, M. Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In: Janvier, C. eds. (1987) Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 3340
 Lovell, K. Some aspects of the growth of the concept of a function. In: Rosskopf, M. F., Steffe, L. P., Taback, S. eds. (1971) Piagetian Cognitive Development Research and Mathematical Education. NCTM, Washington, D.C., pp. 1233
 MacLane, S. (1986) Mathematics: Form and Function. SpringerVerlag New York Inc., USA
 Malik, M. A.: 1980, ‘Historical and pedagogical aspects of the definition of function’, International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science & Technology 11.
 Markovits, Z., Eylon, B., and Bruckheimer, M.: 1983, ‘Functions linearity unconstrained’, in R. Hershkowitz (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of PME, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel, pp. 271–277.
 Markovits, Z., Eylon, B., Bruckheimer, M. (1986) Functions today and yesterday. For the Learning of Mathematics 6: pp. 1824
 Marnyanskii, I. A. Psychological characteristics of pupils' assimilation of the concept of a function. In: Kilpatrick, J., Wirszup, I., Begle, E., Wilson, J. eds. (1975) Soviet Studies in the Psychology of Learning and Teaching Mathematics XIII. SMSG, University of Chicago Press, USA, pp. 163172
 Michigan Essential Goals And Objectives For Mathematics Education: 1988, Michigan State Board of Education.
 Monk, G. S.: 1988, ‘Students' understanding of functions in calculus courses’, Humanistic Mathematics Network Newsletter 2.
 Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM, Virginia, USA
 Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (working draft). NCTM, Virginia, USA
 Nesher, P. (1986) Are mathematical understanding and algorithmic performance related?. For the Learning of Mathematics 6: pp. 29
 Nichols, E. D., Edwards, M. L., Garland, E. H., Hoffman, S. A., Mamary, A., Palmer, W. F. (1986) Holt Algebra 2 with Trigonometry. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Publishers, USA
 Oregon Mathematics Concept Paper No. 2: 1987, Middle School Mathematics, 6–8.
 Peterson, P. L. Teaching for higher order thinking in mathematics: The challenge for the next decade. In: Grouws, D. A., Cooney, T. J., Jones, D. eds. (1988) Effective Mathematics Teaching. NCTM, Reston, Virginia, pp. 226
 Resnick, L. B. (1987) Education and Learning to Think. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
 Resnick, L. B., Ford, W. W. (1984) The Psychology of Mathematics for Instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd., London
 Romberg, T. A. A common curriculum for mathematics. In: Fenstermacher, G. D., Goodlad, J. I., Rehage, K. J. eds. (1983) Individual Differences and the Common Curriculum — 82nd Yearbook of the NSSE. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 121159
 Schoenfeld, A. H.: 1987, On mathematics as sensemaking: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics, Paper presented at the OERI/LRDC Conference on Informal Reasoning and Education, Pittsburgh, PA.
 Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988) When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of “welltaught” mathematics classes. Educational Psychologist 23: pp. 145166
 Shulman, L. S. (1986) Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15: pp. 414
 Silver, E. A. Using conceptual and procedural knowledge: A focus on relationships. In: Hiebert, J. eds. (1986) Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 181198
 Tamir, P.: 1987, Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Educational Research, Washington, DC.
 Thomas, H. L. The concept of function. In: Rosskopf, M. E. eds. (1975) Children's Mathematical Concepts. Six Piagetian Studies in Mathematics Education. Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 145172
 Thompson, A. G. (1984) The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics 15: pp. 105127
 Tirosh, D., Nachmias, R., and Arcavi, A.: 1990, The effects of exploring a new representation on prospective teachers' conception of functions. Unpublished manuscript.
 Vinner, S. (1983) Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 14: pp. 239305
 Vinner, S., Dreyfus, T. (1989) Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20: pp. 356366
 Wilder, R. L. The nature of modern mathematics. In: Lamon, W. E. eds. (1972) Learning & the Nature of Mathematics. Science Research Associates, Inc., USA, pp. 3548
 Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., Richert, A. “150 ways of knowing”: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In: Calderhead, J. eds. (1987) Exploring Teacher Thinking. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Sussex, pp. 104124
 Title
 Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions
 Journal

Educational Studies in Mathematics
Volume 21, Issue 6 , pp 521544
 Cover Date
 19901201
 DOI
 10.1007/BF00315943
 Print ISSN
 00131954
 Online ISSN
 15730816
 Publisher
 Kluwer Academic Publishers
 Additional Links
 Authors

 Ruhama Even ^{(1)}
 Author Affiliations

 1. Science Teaching Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel