The structure of subjective well-being in nine western societies Article DOI:
Cite this article as: Andrews, F.M. & Inglehart, R.F. Soc Indic Res (1979) 6: 73. doi:10.1007/BF00305437 Abstract
The structure of subjective well-being is analyzed by multidimensional mapping of evaluations of life concerns. For example, one finds that evaluations of Income are close to (i.e., relatively strongly related to) evaluations of Standard of living, but remote from (weakly related to) evaluations of Health. These structures show how evaluations of life components fit together and hence illuminate the psychological meaning of life quality. They can be useful for determining the breadth of coverage and degree of redundancy of social indicators of perceived well-being. Analyzed here are data from representative sample surveys in Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, and the United States (each N≈1000). Eleven life concerns are considered, including Income, Housing, Job, Health, Leisure, Neighborhood, Transportation, and Relations with other people. It is found that structures in all of these countries have a basic similarity and that the European countries tend to be more similar to one another than they are to USA. These results suggest that comparative research on subjective well-being is feasible within this group of nations.
Prepared initially for presentation at the 1977 Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Chicago, August 1977. We are grateful to Kai Hildebrant for his skillful processing of data for this paper and for many useful suggestions regarding the analysis. Ed Schneider and James Lingoes also provided helpful advice.
AbramsM. ‘Subjective social indicators’.
. London, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 1973.
AllardtE. ‘Dimensions of welfare in a comparative Scandinavian study’.
No. 9. Helsinki, Research Group for Comparative Sociology, University of Helsinki, 1975.
AndrewsF. M. and WitheyS. B.
Social Indicators of Well-being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality
. New York. Plenum, 1976.
CampbellA., ConverseP. E., and RodgersW. L.
The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions
. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.
Computer Support Group of the Center for Political Studies.
: Program Writeup. Ann Arbor, Michigan, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, June 1976.
Development Academy of the Philippines.
Measuring the Quality of Life: Philippine Social Indicators
. Manila, Development Academy of the Philippines, 1975.
GuttmanL. ‘A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points’.
HallJ. ‘Subjective measures of quality of life in Britain: 1971 to 1975; Some developments and trends’.
, No. 7. London, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 1976.
The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics
. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1977.
LevyS. ‘Use of the mapping sentence for coordinating theory and research: A cross cultural example’.
Quality and Quantity
LingoesJ. C. and BorgI. ‘Procrustean individual difference scaling’.
Journal of Marketing Research
LingoesJ. C., GuttmanL., and RoskamE. E.
Geometric Representations of Relational Data
. Ann Arbor, Michigan, Mathesis Press, 1977.
Lingoes, J. C. and Roskam, E. ‘A mathematical and empirical study of two multidemensional scaling algorithms’.
Psychometric Monographs, 1973, 38.
LingoesJ. C. and SchönemannP. H. ‘Alternative measures of fit for the Schönemann-Carrol matrix fitting algorithm’.
NeelJ. V., RothhammerF., and LingoesJ. C. ‘The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomamo Indians. X. Agreement between representations of village distances based on different sets of characteristics’.
American Journal of Human Genetics
Satisfaction et Insatisfaction Quant aux Conditions de Vie dans les Pays Membres de la Communaute Europeene
. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities, 1974.
RiffaultH. and RabierJ. R.
The perception of poverty in Europe
. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities, 1977.
RoskamE. and LingoesJ. C. ‘MINISSA-I: A FORTRAN IV (G) program for the smallest space analysis of square symmetric matrices’.
SchönemannP. H. and CarrollR. M. ‘Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion’.
ShepardR. M., RomneyA. K., and NerloveS. B.
. New York, Seminar Press, 1972.
Google Scholar Copyright information
© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1979