Predicting the quality of life in the United States
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A principal components analysis performed by David M. Smith on 47 U.S. state level indicators of social well-being yielded several components. The first two of these are socio-economic well-being and social pathology. Structural hypotheses are offered to explain state differences in these components. The structural variables condensed by a principal components analysis of state political, economic and social structure measures are differentiation, flexibility-rigidity, and progressive industrialization. These, along with several population measures, determine a substantial part of the variance in the two measures of social well-being.
- MacCannell, Earle Dean: 1968, ‘Structural differentiation and rigidity in forty-eight states of the United States’, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.
- Perloff, Harvey S. (1960) Regions, Resources and Economic Growth. Resources for the Future, Washington
- Schmookler, Jacob (1966) Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Sheldon, Eleanor Bernert, Parke, Robert (1975) ‘Social Indicators’ in Science 16: pp. 693-699
- Smith, David M. (1973) The Geography of Social Well-Being in the United States. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York
- Young, Frank W. and Fujimoto, Isao: 1965, ‘Social differentiation in Latin American communities’, Economic Development and Cultural Change XIII No. 3, April.
- Young, Ruth C. and Moreno, Jose A.: 1965, ‘Economic development and social rigidity: A comparative study of the forty-eight states’, Economic Development and Cultural Change XIII, No. 4, July.
- Predicting the quality of life in the United States
Social Indicators Research
Volume 6, Issue 1 , pp 23-40
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors