University students' priorities: Life goals vs. relationships
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To assess the importance of life goals and relationships, a specially designed Life Goals Scale was administered to 303 university students (200 women and 103 men). Women's average ratings for relationships exceeded those of men. Men and women did not differ in average importance ratings of goals nor in tendency to sacrifice goals for a heterosexual relationship. Seventy-three percent were willing to sacrifice a majority of their goals for the relationship. The goal vs. relationship choices were influenced by sex role orientation, by dating status, and by the importance of marriage. Gender, age, year in school, parents' marital status, and grade point average were unrelated to goal vs. relationship choices. Stepwise multiple regression analyses indicated different predictors of goal vs. relationship choices for men and women.
- Batson, C. D., & Ventis, W. L. (1982). The religious experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.
- Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162.
- Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205.
- Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 254–364.
- Bilsker, D., Schiedel, D., & Marcia, J. (1988). Sex differences in identity status. Sex Roles, 18, 231–236.
- Carley, J. H., & Stanford, A. (1982). Female career preference and androgyny. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 30(3), 258–264.
- Catalyst (1987). New roles for men and women. A Report on an educational intervention with college students. New York: Author.
- Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Davis, J. E. (1987, June). Understanding and developing intimacy in men. Paper presented at the Association for Christians in Student Development National Conference, Marion, IN.
- Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.
- Delworth, U., & Seeman, D. (1984). The ethics of care: Implications of Gilligan for the student services profession. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 489–492.
- Dowling, C. (1981). The Cinderalla complex. New York: Pocket Books.
- Fiorentine, R. (1988). Increasing similarity in the values and life plans of male and female college students? Evidence and implications. Sex Roles, 18, 143–158.
- Frease-McMahan, L. (1989). The effect of being masculine, feminine, or androgynous on women's orientation toward relationships or life goals. Unpublished master's thesis, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA.
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Goldberg, A. S., & Shiflett, S. (1981). Goals of male and female college students: Do traditional sex differences still exist? Sex Roles, 7, 1213–1222.
- Goldberg, H. (1976). The hazards of being male. New York: Nash.
- Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147–168.
- Komarovsky, M. (1974). Patterns of self-disclosure of male undergraduates. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 677–686.
- Komarovsky, M. (1985). Women in college: Shaping new feminine identities. New York: Basic Books.
- Olstad, K. (1975). Brave new men: A basis for discussion. In J. Petras (Ed.), Sex: Male/gender: Masculine. New York: Alfred.
- Orlofsky, J. L., Aslin, A. L., & Ginsburg, S. D. (1977). Differential effectiveness of two classification procedures on the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 414–416.
- Pedersen, D. M., & Bond, B. I. (1985). Shifts in sex-role after a decade of cultural change. Psychological Reports, 57, 43–48.
- Phillips, S. D., & Johnston, S. L. (1985). Attitudes toward work roles for women. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 334–338.
- Robinson, R. J. (1981). Self-disclosure, friendship and emotional intimacy among men. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 785B.
- Rubin, L. B. (1983). Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper & Row.
- Schwartz, F. N. (1989). Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review, 67, 65–76.
- Tesch, S. T. (1984). Sex-role orientation and intimacy status in men and women. Sex Roles, 84, 451–465.
- Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1988). Masculinity, femininity, and self-esteem: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 419–431.
- Wong, F. T. P., Kettlewell, G., & Sproule, C. F. (1985). On the importance of being masculine: Sex role, attributions, and women's career achievement. Sex Roles, 12(7/8), 757–769.
- Zuckerman, D. M. (1985). Confidence and aspirations: Self-esteem and self-concepts and predictors of students' life goals. Journal of Personality, 53, 543–560.
- University students' priorities: Life goals vs. relationships
Volume 23, Issue 1-2 , pp 1-14
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors