Abstract
Two studies tested the influence of various types of verbal evaluative feedback men's and women's self-evaluations of their performance in achievenment situations. We tested a theory that women perceive evaluative feedback, particularly negative feedback, to be more informative about their abilities than do men. Because of this, women's self-assessments of their abilities are more straightforwardly influenced by evaluative feedback than are men's. In contrast, men take a more self-promotional approach to evaluative situations, and therefore are more selective in their responses to feedback. Results from our questionnaire study showed that women's self-evaluations were influenced by both positive and negative evaluative statements. Men allowed positive feedback to influence them more than negative feedback, and were less influenced overall by negative feedback than women. Furthermore, women reported that evaluative feedback, particularly negative feedback, contained more information relevant to their abilities than men. Our laboratory study showed that women's actual self-evaluations were impacted differently by positive and negative feedback, whereas men's were not. In addition, we found some evidence to indicate that women were more negatively influenced by feedback that was positively toned, yet irrelevant with respect to their performance, than men. This finding underscores the fact that the focus, and not just the valence, of evaluative feedback plays an important role in men's and women's responses to it.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson, E. The social animal. San Francisco: Freeman, 1972.
Bandura, A. Vicarious and self-reinforcement processes. In R. Glaser (Ed.), The nature of reinforcement. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Berk, L. E., & Lewis, N. G. Sex role and social behavior in four school environments. Elementary School Journal, 1977, 77, 205–217.
Blumenfeld, P., Hamilton, V., & Bossert, S. Teacher talk and student thought: Socialization into the student role. Paper presented at the Learning Research and Development Center Conference on Student Motivation, 1979.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970, 61, 365–374.
Carlson, R. Understanding women: Implications for personality theory and research. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 17–32.
Crandall, V. C. Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement-related motives in children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.
Digman, J. M. Principal dimensions of child personality as inferred from teacher's judgments. Child Development, 1963, 34, 43–60.
Dweck, C. S., & Bush, E. S. Sex differences in learned helplessness: I. Differential debilitation with peer and adult evaluators. Developmental Psychology, 1976, 12, 147–156.
Dweck, C. S., Davison, W., Nelson, S., & Enna, B. Sex differences in learned helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and II. An experimental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 1978, 14, 268–276.
Dweck, C. S., & Gilliard, D. Expectancy statements as determinants of reactions to failure: Sex differences in persistance and expectancy change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 1077–1084.
Eagly, A. H. Sex differences in influenceability. Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 75, 86–116.
Etaugh, C., & Harlow, H. School attitudes and performance of elementary school children as related to teacher's sex and behavior. In E. Biophy & T. J. Good (Eds.), Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
Etaugh, C., & Hughes, V. Teacher evaluations of sex-typed behaviors in children: The role of teacher, sex and school setting. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 394–395.
Feather, N. T. The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement-related motives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 63, 552–561.
Feather, N. T., & Simon, J. G. Attribution of responsibility and valence of outcome in relation to initial confidence and success and failure of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 18, 173–188.
Freedman, J. L., Carlsmith, J. M., & Sears, D. O. Social psychology, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
Hill, K. T., & Dusek, J. B. Children's achievement expectations as a function of social reinforcement, sex of subject, and test anxiety. Child Development, 1969, 40, 547–557.
House, W. C., & Penrney, V. Valence of expected and unexpected outcomes as a function of locus of control and type of expectancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 454–463.
Jacobson, L. I., Berger, S. E., & Millham, J. Individual differences in cheating during a temptation period when confronting failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 15, 48–56.
Julian, J. W., Regula, C. R., & Hollander, E. P. Effects of prior agreement by others on task confidence and conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 171–178.
Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. Praise, involvement and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 53, 383–390.
Lenney, E. Women's self confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 1–13.
Lewinsohn, P. M., Mischel, W., Chaplin, W., & Barton, R. Social competence and depression: The role of illusory self-perceptions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1980, 89, 203–212.
Lippitt, R., & Gold, M. Classroom social structure and a mental health problem. Journal of Social Issues, 1959, 15, 40–49.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1974.
Martin, D. J., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. Illusion of control for self and others in depressed and nondepressed college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 125–136.
McMahon, I. D. Relationships between causal attributions and expectancy of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 28, 108–114.
Meyer, W., & Thompson, G. Sex differences in the distribution of teacher approval and disapproval among sixth-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1956, 47, 385–395.
Miller, J. B. Toward a new psychology of women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1976.
Minuchin, P. P., & Shapiro, E. K. The school as a context for social development. In P. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 4, 4th ed., New York: Wiley, 1983.
Nicholls, J. G. Causal attribution and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value and sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 379–389.
Parsons, T. Family structure and socialization of the child. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family: Socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1955.
Rehm, L. P. A self-control model of depression. In J. C. Coyne (Ed.), Essential Papers on Depression. New York: New York University Press, 1986.
Stevenson, H. W., Hale, G. A., Klein, R. E., & Miller, L. K. Interrelations and correlates in children's learning and problem solving. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1968, 33(7, Serial No. 123).
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103, 193–210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We gratefully acknowledge Mary Rose and Daniel Rosenberg for their help in data collection.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, TA., Nolen-Hoeksema, S. Sex differences in reactions to evaluative feedback. Sex Roles 21, 725–747 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289805
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289805