When to speak like a lady
- Susan Kemper
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The existence of sexually biased stereotypes about the polite speech of men and women was documented in a series of three studies. In Study I, masculine, feminine, and neutral activities were identified. In Study II, the perceived politeness of five different forms of requests was determined. In the final study, men and women were asked to judge the appropriateness of requests by men and women speakers to addressees of either sex. The requests differed in politeness, and requested either masculine, feminine, or neutral actions. These ratings revealed that women are expected to speak more politely than men, regardless of the sex of the addressee or the nature of the requested action. However, men are expected to use different forms for requests for masculine, feminine, and neutral actions and to use different forms of requests for men and women addressees.
- Edelsky, C. Acquisition of an aspect of communicative competence: Learning what it means to talk like a lady. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
- Ervin-Tripp, S. Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 1976, 5, 25–66. (a)
- Ervin-Tripp, S. Speech acts and social learning. In K. Basso & H. Selby (Eds.) Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1976. (b)
- Jespersen, O. Language: Its nature, development, and origin. London: Allen and Unwin, 1922.
- Kemper, S., & Thissen, D. Memory for the dimensions of requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981, 20, 552–563.
- Kramer, C. Women's speech: Separate but unequal? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1974, 60, 14–24. (a)
- Kramer, C. Folklinguistics. Psychology Today, June 1974, 8, 82–85. (b)
- Kruskal, J. B., Young, F. W., & Seery, J. B. How to use KYST, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Unpublished report, Bell Laboratories, 1973.
- Labov, W. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.
- Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. Language in Society. 1973, 2, 45–79.
- Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
- Lakoff, R. What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics, and performatives. In A. Rogers, B. Wall, & J. P. Murphy (Eds.), Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implications. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1977.
- Lakoff, R. Stylistic strategies within a grammer of style. In J. Orasanu, M. K. Slater, & L. L. Adler (Eds.), Language, sex, and gender: Does “la difference” make a difference? New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1979.
- Levine, L., & Crockett, H. J., Jr. Speech variation in a Piedmont community: Postvocalic r. In S. Lieberson (Ed.), Explorations in sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 1966.
- Pruzansky, S. SINDSCAL: A computer program for individual differences in multidimensional scaling. Unpublished report, Bell Laboratories, 1975.
- Shepard, R. N. Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 1980, 210(24), 390–397.
- Thorne, B., & Henley, N. Difference and dominance: An overview of language, gender, and society. In B. Throne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury, 1975.
- Trudgill, P. Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban Britain English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1972, 1, 179–195.
- When to speak like a lady
Volume 10, Issue 5-6 , pp 435-443
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Susan Kemper (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, 426 Fraser Hall, 66045, Lawrence, Kansas