Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Species-specific antipredator capacities and prey refuges: interactions between piscivorous perch (Perca fluviatilis) and juvenile perch and roach (Rutilus rutilus)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The outcome of predator-prey interactions depends on the characteristics of predators and prey as well as the structure of the environment. In a replicated field enclosure experiment, we tested the effects of quantity and quality of different prey refuges (no structure, structure forming a partial refuge, and structure forming a complete refuge) on the interaction between piscivorous perch (Perca fluviatilis) and juvenile perch and roach (Rutilus rutilus). We quantified the behaviour of the predators and the prey and predator-induced prey mortality. The piscivores stayed in or close to the prey refuge and were more dispersed in the presence than in the absence of prey refuges. Survival of juvenile perch and roach decreased in the presence of predators and was higher for juvenile roach than for juvenile perch. In addition, juvenile perch survival increased with refuge efficiency Roach formed schools which were denser in the presence of predators, had a higher swimming speed (both in the open water and in the refuge) and used a larger area than juvenile perch. Both prey species decreased their distance to the prey refuge and increased the proportion of their time spent in the refuge in the presence of predators. The number of switches between the open-water habitat and the prey refuge was higher for juvenile roach than for juvenile perch. Juvenile perch used different parts of the prey refuge in a flexible way depending both on presence of predators and refuge type whereas juvenile roach used the different parts of the prey refuge in fixed proportions over all refuge treatments. Our results suggest that juvenile roach had a overall higher capacity to avoid predation than juvenile perch. However, in the presence of qualitatively different prey refuges juvenile perch responded to predators with more flexible refuge use than juvenile roach. The differences in antipredator capacities of juvenile perch and roach when subjected to piscivorous perch predation may depend on differences in life history patterns of the two species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beyerle GB, Williams JE (1968) Some observations of food selectivity by northern pike in aquaria. Trans Am Fish. Soc. 97: 28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen B, Persson L (1993) Species-specific antipredatory behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenman B (1992) Evolution in organisms that change their niches during the life cycle. Am Nat 139: 990–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenman B, Persson L (1988) Dynamics in size-structured populations — an overview. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size-structured populations — ecology and evolution, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • EkLöv P (1992) Group foraging versus solitary foraging in piscivorous predators: the perch, Perca fluviatilis, and pike, Esox lucius, patterns. Anim Behav 44:313–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklöv P, Diehl S (1994) Piscivore efficiency and refuging prey: the importance of predator search mode. Oecologia 98: 344–353

    Google Scholar 

  • EkLöv P, Hamrin SF (1989) Predatory efficiency and prey selection: interactions between pike Esox lucius, perch Perca fluviatilis and rudd Scardinus erythrophthalmus. Oikos 56:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford RG, Krumme DW (1979) The analysis of space use patterns. J Theor Biol 76:125–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JF, Fraser DF (1988) Resource depletion and habitat segregation by competitors under predation hazard. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size-structured populations — ecology and evolution. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman GS (1986) Behavioral responses of prey fishes during predator-prey interactions. In: Lauder GV, Feder ME (eds) Predator-prey relationships in lower vertebrates: ecology, behavior, physiology; and morphology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 135–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Hileman KS, Brodie Jr ED (1994) Survival strategies of the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus: interaction of predator-avoidance and anti-predator mechanisms. Anim Behav 47:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR, Dobson AP (1987) Antipredator behaviour and the population dynamics of simple predator-prey systems. Am Nat 130: 431–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Hasson O (1991) Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology 72: 2249–2260

    Google Scholar 

  • Landeau L, Terborgh J (1986) Oddity and the “confusion effect” in predation. Anim Behav 34: 1372–1380

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68: 619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1990) The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator defence in fish. Ann Zool Fenn 27:51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Higham A (1988) Information transfer across fish shoals under predation threat. Ethology 78:153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1987) Provenance, shoal size and the sociobiology of predator evasion behaviour in minnow shoals. Proc R Soc Lond B 229:439–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Oulton WJ, Pitcher TJ (1985) Vigilant behaviour and shoal size in minnows. Z Tierpsychol 67:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangel M, Roitberg BD (1992) Behavioral stabilization of host-parasite population dynamics. Theor Popul Biol 42:308–320

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair JN (1986) The effects of refuges on predator-prey interactions: a reconsideration. Theor Popul Biol 29:38–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer A (1987) Phenotypic plasticity and heterochrony in Cichlasoma managuense (Pices, Cichlidae) and their implications for speciation in cichlid fishes. Evolution 41:1357–1369

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG (1988) Competition among refuging sunfishes and effects of fish density on littoral zone invertebrates. Ecology 69: 614–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody RC, Hellard JM, Stein RA (1983) Escape tactics used by bluegills and fathead minnows to avoid predation by tiger muskellunge. Environ Biol Fish 1:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:1–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill StJ Sr, Cullen JM (1974) Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators. J Zool Lond 172:549–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1986) Temperature-induced shift in foraging ability in two fish species, roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis): implications for coexistence between poikilotherms. J Anim Ecol 55:829–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1988) Asymmetries in competitive and predatory interactions in fish populations. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size-structured Populations — ecology and evolution. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L, Diehl S, Johansson L, Andersson G, Hamrin SF (1991) Shifts in fish communities along the productivity gradient of temperate lakes — patterns and the importance of size-structured interactions. J Fish Biol 38:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L, EkLöv P (1995) Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology 76: 70–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L, Johansson L, Andersson G, Diehl S, Hamrin SF (1993) Density dependent interactions in lake ecosystems: whole lake perturbation experiments. Oikos 66:193–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ (1986) Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm, London, pp 294–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Reist JD (1980) Selective predation upon pelvic phenotypes of brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans, by northern pike, Esox lucius. Can J Zool 1245–1252

  • Savino JF, Stein RA (1982) Predator-prey interactions between largemouth- bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated submersed vegetation. Trans Am Fish Soc 111:255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Savino JF, Stein RA (1989a) Behavioural interactions between fish predators and their prey: effects of plant density. Anim Behav 37:311–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Savino JF, Stein RA (1989b) Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation. Environ Biol Fish 24:287–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm HL Jr, Zale AV (1985) Effects of cover and prey size on preferences of juvenile largemouth bass for blue tilapas and bluegills in tanks. Trans Am Fish Soc 114:725–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987a) Prey refuges and predator-prey stability. Theor Popul Biol 31:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987b) Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 203–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Petranka JW, Kats LB (1988) The dynamics of prey refuge use: a model and tests with sunfish and salamander larvae. Am Nat 132:463–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RA, Magnusson JJ (1976) Behavioral response of crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology 57:751–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Svärdsson G (1976) Interspecific population dominance in fish communities of Scandinavian lakes. Rep Inst Freshwater Res Drottningholm 56:144–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AM, Mittelbach GG (1990) Predator avoidance and community structure: interactions among piscivores, planktivores and plankton. Ecology 71:2241–2254

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1984) Body form, locomotion and foraging in aquatic vertebrates. Am Zool 24:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW, Buffrénil V de (1990) Locomotion in the biology of large aquatic vertebrates. Trans Am Fish Soc 119:629–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1977) Species packing and niche complementary in three sunfishes. Am Nat 111: 553–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1988) Size, scaling, and the evolution of complex life cycles. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size-structured populations —ecology and evolution. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 60–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1992) Individual behaviour and higher-order species interactions. Am Nat 140:5–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Hall DJ (1988) Ontogenetic habitat shifts in the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus): The foraging rate-predation risk tradeoff. Ecology 69:1352–1366

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall D, Mittelbach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberger PH (1991) Causes of morphological plasticity in cichlid fishes. Ph D thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Ecology, Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden

    Peter Eklöv & Lennart Persson

Authors
  1. Peter Eklöv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lennart Persson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Communicated by F. Trillmich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eklöv, P., Persson, L. Species-specific antipredator capacities and prey refuges: interactions between piscivorous perch (Perca fluviatilis) and juvenile perch and roach (Rutilus rutilus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37, 169–178 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176714

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176714

Key words

Search

Navigation