The inherent disadvantage of the presidential party in midterm congressional elections
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The authors thank Morris Fiorina for his assistance and encouragement.
- Campbell, Angus. (1960). Surge and decline: A study of electoral change. Public Opinion Quarterly 24 (Fall).
- Kernell, Samuel. (1977). Presidential popularity and negative voting. American Political Science Review 71 (March): 44–66.
- Key, V.O. (1964). Politics, parties and pressure groups. New York: Crowell.
- Miller, Warren E. (1955–56). Presidential coattails: A study in political myth and methodology. Public Opinion Quarterly 19 (Winter).
- Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R. (1978). The changing American voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- Schoenberger, Robert A. (1969). Campaign strategy and party loyalty. American Political Science Review 63 (June).
- Stokes, Donald E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review 57 (June).
- Tufte, Edward R. (1975). Determinants of the outcomes of midterm congressional elections. American Political Science Review 69 (September): 812–826.
- Tufte, Edward R. (1978). Political control of the economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- The inherent disadvantage of the presidential party in midterm congressional elections
Volume 36, Issue 1 , pp 141-146
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague/Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors