Are urban bus services natural monopolies?
- Andrew W. EvansAffiliated withThe Flinders University of South Australia
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Although Britain's local bus services have been open to free competition for more than three years, most have continued to be operated as monopolies by the original incumbents. Some competition has occurred, but the incumbents have usually driven off entrants. This paper uses findings from case-studies of competition and from deregulation generally to consider whether monopoly operation has inherent advantages over competitive operation. If so, urban bus routes would be natural monopolies. The evidence suggests that they may be, because single-operator services are more convenient for users.
Key wordsbus deregulation bus competition bus markets contestability monopoly
- Are urban bus services natural monopolies?
Volume 18, Issue 2 , pp 131-150
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- bus deregulation
- bus competition
- bus markets
- Industry Sectors
- Andrew W. Evans (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. The Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, GPO Box 2100, 5001, Adelaide, SA, Australia