Improving university teaching: what Brazilian students say about their teachers
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The major purpose of the research reported here was to gather, analyze and interpret the opinions about effective university teachers held by 392 students randomly selected from each of the populations of students attending the Schools of Nursing, Dentistry and Medicine at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil. A 72-item scale was developed based upon a review of the literature on effective teaching and qualitative information collected through an open-ended instrument given to 175 students attending the same schools but not a part of the final randomly selected samples. The final scale asked students to bear in mind a particular teacher they judged effective and to indicate on a Likert 5-point scale the degree to which that teacher exhibited the behaviors and/or attributes proposed by each of the 72 items.
The student responses were first analyzed for the purpose of identifying those teacher behaviors and/or attributes most frequently and highly rated. Following this, factor analyses were performed to identify the factors involved in the students' description of effective university teachers.
Six factors were identified and were named: I Student Participation; II Classroom Organization and Management; III Teacher Clarity; IV Acceptance of Students; V Punctuality, and VI Systematization. In light of the research on effective teaching and in an effort to provide focus for efforts to improve university teaching, these factors were further clustered under three foci for staff development: (1) improving interpersonal relationships, (2) improving organization, management and evaluation and (3) enhancing knowledge and understanding.
- Amodeo, M.C.B. (1979). Caracteristicas do Professor Universitario Eficaz, de Acordo com a Opiniao de Alunos do 3o Grau: um Estudo Exploratorio. Porto Alegre, RS: CPO Educacao, UFRGS, Master's thesis.
- Bush, R.N. (1954). The Teacher-Pupil Relationship. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
- Castro, S.A.M. (1972). Um Estudo sobre as Caracteristicas de um Professor. Sao Paulo, S.P.: Fac. Educacao USP, Doctoral dissertation.
- Cohen, P.A. (1981). Student Ratings of Instructors and Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Multisector Validity Studies. Review of Educational Research, 51: 281–309.
- Cruickshank, D. and Kennedy, J. J. (1986). Teacher Clarity. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies (in press).
- Dunkin, M.T. and Barnes, T. (1986). ‘Research on Teaching in Higher Education’ in Wittrock, M.C., ed. Handbook of Research on Teaching - Third Edition. New York: MacMillan Publ. Co.: pp. 754–777.
- Feldens, M.G.F. et al. (1980). Uma Investigacao Empirica sobre a Natureza de Clareza de Professor. Ciencia e Cultura, 32 (2): 228–235.
- Feldman, K. (1976). Grades and College Students' Evaluations of Their Courses and Teachers. Research in Higher Education, 5 (3): 243–288.
- Feldman, K. (1984). Class Size and College Students' Evaluation of Teachers and Courses: A Closer Look. Research in Higher Education, 21 (1): 45–116.
- Gage, N.L. (1978). ‘The Yield of Research on Teaching’ Phi Delta Kappan, 60 (3): 229–35.
- Gorsuch, R.L. (1974). Factor Analysis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.
- Hildebrand, M. (1973). The Character and Skills of the Effective Professor. The Journal of Higher Education, 44 (1): 41–50.
- McKeachie, W.J. (1979). Student Ratings of Faculty: A Reprise. Academe, October.
- Magdalena, B.C. (1980). Percepcao da Alunos sobre Clareza do Professor: um Estudo na 3a Serie de 2o Grau. Porto Alegre, RS: CPG Educacao: UFRGS, Master's thesis.
- Marsh, H.W. (1982). Validity of Students' Evaluation of College Teaching: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74: 264–279.
- Miron, M. and Segal, E. (1978). The Good University Teacher as Perceived By the Students. Higher Education, 7(1): 27–44.
- Moses, I. (1985). High Quality Teaching in a University: Identification and Description. Studies in Higher Education, 10 (3): 301–313.
- Rosenshine, B. (1971). Teaching Behaviors and Student Achievement. Windsor: National Foundation for Educational Research.
- Rosenshine, B. and Furst, N. (1973). ‘The Use of Direct Observation to Study Teaching’ in Travers, R.M.W., ed. Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publ.
- Ryans, D.G. (1960). Characteristics of Teachers. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
- Scheurich, V. et al. (1983). Expected Grades Versus Specific Evaluations of the Teachers as Predictors of Students' Overall Evaluation of the Teachers. Research in Higher Education, 19 (2): 159–173.
- Travers, R.M.W., ed. (1973). Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publ.
- Improving university teaching: what Brazilian students say about their teachers
Volume 15, Issue 6 , pp 641-649
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul and Department of Educational Policy and Leadership, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA
- 2. Department of Educational Policy and Leadership, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA