Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The purpose of this study was to observe the effects of changing the grain (the first level of spatial resolution possible with a given data set) and extent (the total area of the study) of landscape data on observed spatial patterns and to identify some general rules for comparing measures obtained at different scales. Simple random maps, maps with contagion (i.e., clusters of the same land cover type), and actual landscape data from USGS land use (LUDA) data maps were used in the analyses. Landscape patterns were compared using indices measuring diversity (H), dominance (D) and contagion (C). Rare land cover types were lost as grain became coarser. This loss could be predicted analytically for random maps with two land cover types, and it was observed in actual landscapes as grain was increased experimentally. However, the rate of loss was influenced by the spatial pattern. Land cover types that were clumped disappeared slowly or were retained with increasing grain, whereas cover types that were dispersed were lost rapidly. The diversity index decreased linearly with increasing grain size, but dominance and contagion did not show a linear relationship. The indices D and C increased with increasing extent, but H exhibited a variable response. The indices were sensitive to the number (m) of cover types observed in the data set and the fraction of the landscape occupied by each cover type (P k); both m and P kvaried with grain and extent. Qualitative and quantitative changes in measurements across spatial scales will differ depending on how scale is defined. Characterizing the relationships between ecological measurements and the grain or extent of the data may make it possible to predict or correct for the loss of information with changes in spatial scale.
- Addicott, J.F., Aho, J.M., Antolin, M.F., Padilla, D.K., Richardson, J.S. and Soluk, D.A. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340–346.
- Allen, T.F.H. and Starr, T.B. 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Allen, T.F.H., O'Neill, R.V. and Hoekstra, T.W. 1987. Inter-level relations in ecological research and management: some working principles from hierarchy theory. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 14: 63–79.
- Delcourt, H.R., Delcourt, P.A. and Webb III, T. 1983. Dynamic plant ecology: the spectrum of vegetation change in space and time. Quat. Sci. Rev. 1: 153–175.
- Fegas, R.G., Claire, R.W., Guptill, S.C., Anderson, K.E. and Hallam, C.A. 1983. Land use and land cover digital data. Geological Survey Circular 895-E. U.S. Geological Survey, Cartographic Information Center, Reston, Virginia.
- Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
- Gardner, R.H., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G. and O'Neill, R.V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landsc. Ecol. 1: 19–28.
- Getis, A. and Franklin, J. 1987. Second order analysis of mapped point patterns. Ecology 68: 473–477.
- Henderson-Sellers, A., Wilson, M.F. and Thomas, G. 1985. The effect of spatial resolution on archives of land cover type. Climatic Change 7: 391–402.
- Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., O'Neill, R.V. and Coleman, P.R. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.
- Meentemeyer, V. and Box, E.O. 1987. Scale effects in landscape studies. In Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance, pp. 15–34. Edited by M.G. Turner. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Morris, D.W. 1987. Ecological scale and habitat use. Ecology 68: 362–369.
- Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A.S. 1984. Landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- O'Neill, R.V., DeAngelis, D.L., Waide, J.B. and Allen, T.F.H. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
- O'Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D.L., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. and Graham, R.L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landsc. Ecol. 1: 153–162.
- Romme, W.H. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 199–221.
- Romme, W.H. and Knight, D.H. 1982. Landscape diversity: the concept applied to Yellowstone Park. BioScience 32: 664–670.
- Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. 1962. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
- Turner, M.G. (ed.) 1987a. Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Turner, M.G. 1987b. Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: a comparison of 3 transition models. Landsc. Ecol. 1: 29–36.
- Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern
Volume 3, Issue 3-4 , pp 153-162
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- spatial scale
- landscape ecology
- spatial pattern
- Industry Sectors