Productivity in the United States and its relationship to government activity: An analysis of 57 years, 1929–1986
- Edgar A. Peden
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Under the classical supply-side paradigm of productivity grouth, raising government economic above rudimentary levels integrates markets and provides useful public goods which enhance growth. Beyond some point however, increasing government activity discourages growth through tax disincentives and by rewarding dependence on government expenditures. Defining government economic activity to be government expenditures as a percentage of GNP, this study looks first at data for the period 1889–1986 and shows that the U.S. economy has experienced what is predicted by the supply-side paradigm. In addition, the study presents an econometric analysis of government's effects on productivity for the period 1929–1986 using a standard neoclassical growth model. This analysis validates the classical supply-side paradigm and shows that maximum productivity growth occurs when government expenditures represent about 20% of GNP, far less than the 35% which existed in 1986.
I wish to thank Tom Hall and Michael D. Bradley for their comments on this paper. Their willingness to dig into the material and subsequent suggestions were very helpful in producing this document. Thanks also, to my wife, Carmen García, who helped me prepare the manuscript.
Barro, R.J. (1977). Unanticipated money growth and unemployment in the United States. American Economic Review 67(1): 101–115.
Barro, R.J. (1981). Output effects of government purchases. Journal of Political Economy 89(6): 1086–1121.
Barth, J.R., Keleher, R.E. and Russek, F.S. (1986). The scale of government and economic activity. Unpublished manuscript.
Branson, W.H. (1979). Macroeconomic theory and policy, 2nd edition. New York: Harper and Row.
Campbell, J.Y. and Mankiw, N.G. (1987). Permanent and transitory components in macroeconomic fluctuation. American Economic Review 77(2): 111–117.
Cochran, T.C. (1977). 200 Years of American business. A New York: Delta Book.
Council of Economic Advisors. (1987). Economc report of the president. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Diamond, P.A. (1965). National debt in a neoclassical model. American Economic Review 55 (December): 1126–1150.
Evans, M.K. (1969). Macroeconomic activity, theory, forecasting, and control. New York: Harper and Row.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Froyen, R.T. (1983). Macroeconomics, theories and policies. New York: Macmillan.
Granger, C.W.J. and Newbold, P. (1977). Forecasting economic time series. New York: Academic Press.
Grossman, P.J. (1987). The optimal size of government. Public Choice (53): 131–147.
Grossman, P.J. (1988). Government and economic growth: A non-linear relationship. Public Choice (56): 193–200.
Kendrick, J. (1961). Productivity trends in the United States. Princeton: The Princeton University Press.
Kormendi, R.C. (1983). Government debt, government spending, and private sector behavior. American Economic Review 73 (December): 994–1010.
Kotlikoff, L.J. (1984). Taxation and savings: A neoclassical perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 22 (December): 1576–1629.
Lucas, R.E. (1973). Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs. American Economic Review 63 (June): 326–334.
Musgrave, R.A. (1969). Fiscal systems. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Peden, E.A. (1987). The effects government expenditures on economic output and growth in the United States: The post World War II experience (1948–1984). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, George Washington University, Washington DC.
Peden, E.A. and Bradley, M.D. (1989). Government size, productivity, and economic growth: The post-war experience. Public Choice 61: 229–245.
Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1981). Econometric models and economic forecasts. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
Romer, C.D. (1986). Is the stabilization of the postwar economy a figment of the data? American Economic Review 76 (3): 314–334.
Solow, R.M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (August): 312–320.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1986). Survey of current business. Washington, DC: Government U.S. Printing Office.
- Productivity in the United States and its relationship to government activity: An analysis of 57 years, 1929–1986
Volume 69, Issue 2 , pp 153-173
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Edgar A. Peden (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Health Care Financing Administration, 9111 E. Town and Country Boulevard, 21043, Ellicott City, MD