The advantages of contingent valuation methods for benefit-cost analysis
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Summary and conclusions
The preceding is a taxonomic discussion of some reasons why contingent market methods may often be a superior means of generating data with which to value non-market commodities. We have argued that economists have erred in viewing the situations these methods posit as necessarily fictional; that the data generated by the methods may, for non-marketed goods and the activities with which they are associated, accord more closely with the conditions of received economic theory; that the methods can make it easier to remove the difficulties of estimation and interpretation introduced by confounding variables; and that they often permit one to deal more readily with phenomena that have not been in the range of historical experience. Nevertheless, whatever the advantages, a major disadvantage remains. Until detailed analytical knowledge is acquired of the manner in which expectations are formed, there exists no way to refute empirical propositions established from contingent markets. Nevertheless, the previously mentioned South Coast Air Basin experiment, where the bids obtained for clean air conformed fairly closely to the values implied in a residential property value study, suggest that contingent valuations have a basis in the real decision processes of consumers.
- Bayes, T. (1764) An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical transactions, giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours of the ingenious in many considerable parts of the world for the year 1763. The Royal Society, London
- Ben-David, S., Schulze, W.D., Noll, S., and Thayer, M. (1977). The economics of geothermal energy: A case study. National Science Foundation Project Report APR 75-18249.
- Bohm, P. (1972) Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment. European Economic Review 3: pp. 111-130
- Bradford, D.D. (1970) Benefit-cost analysis and demand curves for public goods. Kyklos 23: pp. 775-387
- Bradford, D.D., Hildebrandt, M. (1977) Observable preferences for public goods. Journal of Public Economics 8: pp. 106-114
- Brookshire, D., d'Arge, R. (1979). Resource impacted communities: Economics, planning, and management. Paper presented at 4th U.S.-U.S.S.R. Symposium on Comprehensive Analysis of the Environment, Jackson, Wyoming, 1979.
- Brookshire, D., d'Arge, R., Schulze, W., and Thayer, M. (forthcoming (a)). Experiments in valuing public goods. In V.K. Smith (Ed.), Advances in applied microeconomics. JAI Press, Inc.
- Brookshire, D., Ives, B., Schulze, W. (1976) The valuation of aesthetic preferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3: pp. 325-346
- Brookshire, D., Randall, A., and Stoll, J. (forthcoming (b)). Valuing increments and decrements in natural resource service flows. American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
- Buchanan, J. (1969) Cost and choice. Markham Publishing Company, Chicago
- Cummings, R.G., and Schulze, W. (1978). Social valuation of municipal infrastructure in boomtowns: A second look. Manuscript.
- Curry, J.W. (1979). The visual aesthetic impact of alternative closed cycle cooling systems, Vol. 1. Report to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
- Davis, R. (1963) Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal 3: pp. 239-249
- Diewert, W.E. Applications of duality theory. In: Intrilligator, M.D., Kendrick, D.A. eds. (1974) Frontiers of quantitative economics, Vol. 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 106-160
- Freeman, A.M. (1979) The benefits of environmental improvement. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
- Fromm, G. Comment. In: Chase, S.B. eds. (1968) Problems in public expenditure analysis. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., pp. 166-176
- Gramlich, F.W. (1977) The demand for clear water: The case of the Charles River. National Tax Journal 30: pp. 183-194
- Hammack, J., Brown, G. (1974) Waterfowl and wetlands: Toward bioeconomic analysis. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
- Hicks, J.R. (1934) A reconsideration of the theory of value, Part 1. Economica 1: pp. 52-76
- Hori, H. (1975) Revealed preference for public goods. The American Economic Review 65: pp. 978-991
- Horst, R., and Crocker, T. (1978). Household substitution model of the value of visibility. Paper presented at the Western Economic Association Meetings, Honolulu, Hawaii 1978.
- Jones-Lee, M.W. (1976) The value of life. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
- Keeley, M.C., Robins, P.K., Spiegelman, R.G., West, R.W. (1978) The estimation of labour supply models using experimental data. The American Economic Review 68: pp. 873-887
- Loehman, E., Ben-David, S., and De, V.H. (1978). Measuring demand and political acceptability for non-market goods: A case study of health effects related to air quality. Informal Note, CEPR-IB-78-3, SRI International (Oct.).
- Loehman, E. et al. (forthcoming). Distributional analysis of regional benefits and costs of air quality control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
- Mäler, K.G. (1974) Environmental economics. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
- Medawar, P.B. (1979) Induction and intuition in scientific thought. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia
- Mills, E.S., and Feenberg, D. (1977). Measuring benefits of water pollution abatement. A paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Economic Association, New York. (Dec. 28).
- Morgenstern, O. (1959) On the accuracy of economic observations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
- Newhouse, J.P., Phelps, C.E., Schwartz, W.B. (1974) Policy options and the impact of National Health Insurance. Rand Corp, Santa Monica, Calif.
- Norgaard, R.B., Hall, D.C. (1974) Environmental amenity rights, transactions costs, and technological change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1: pp. 251-267
- O'Hanlon, P.W., Sinden, J.A. (1978) Scope for valuation of environmental goods: Comment. Land Economics 54: pp. 381-387
- Plott, C.R. (1979). Experimental methods in political economy: A tool for regulatory research. Social Science Working Paper. California Institute of Technology.
- Randall, A., Grunewald, O., Johnson, S., Ausness, R., Pagoulatos, A. (1978) Reclaiming coal surface mines in central Appalachia: A case study of the benefits and costs. Land Economics 54: pp. 472-489
- Randall, A., Ives, B., Eastman, C. (1974) Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1: pp. 132-149
- Rowe, R., d'Arge, R., and Brookshire, D. (forthcoming). An experiment on the economic value of visibility. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
- Rowe, R., d'Arge, R., and Brookshire, D. (forthcoming). Environmental preferences and effluent charges. Resource and Environmental Economics Laboratory, University of Wyoming Research Paper No. 6.
- Samuelson, P. (1955) Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditures. Review of Economics and Statistics 37: pp. 350-356
- Sinden, J.A., Wyckoff, J.B. (1976) Indifference mapping: An empirical methodology for economic evaluation of the environment. Regional Science and Urban Economics 6: pp. 81-103
- Slutsky, E. (1915) Sulla leoria del bilancio del consumatore. Giormale degli Economisti 51: pp. 1-26
- Smith, V.K., Krutilla, J.V. (1979) Resource and environmental constraints to growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61: pp. 395-408
- Strauss, R.P., Hughes, G.O. (1976) A new approach to the demand for public goods. Journal of Public Economics 6: pp. 191-204
- Vaughn, R. (1974). The value of urban open space. Working Paper 78. Program on Environmental Pollutants and the Urban Economy, Center for Urban Studies, University of Chicago (Aug.).
- The advantages of contingent valuation methods for benefit-cost analysis
Volume 36, Issue 2 , pp 235-252
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors