When financial markets work too well: A cautious case for a securities transactions tax
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Unlike most major industrialized nations, the United States does not impose an excise tax on securities transactions. This article examines the desirability and feasibility of implementating a U.S. Securities Transfer Excise Tax (STET) directed at curbing excesses associated with short-term speculation and at raising revenue. We conclude that strong economic efficiency arguments can be made in support of a STET that throws “sand into the gears,” in James Tobin's (1982) phrase, of our excessively well-functioning financial markets. Such a tax would have the beneficial effects of curbing instability introduced by speculation, reducing the diversion of resources into the financial sector of the economy, and lengthening the horizons of corporate managers. The efficiency benefits derived from curbing speculation are likely to exceed any costs of reduced liquidity or increased costs of capital that come from taxing financial transactions more heavily. The examples of Japan and the United Kingdom suggest that a STET is administratively feasible and can be implemented without crippling the competitiveness of U.S. financial markets. A STET at a .5% rate could raise revenues of at least $10 billion annually.
- A Guide to Japanese Taxes, 1988.
- Black, Fischer, “Noise.” Journal of Finance (1986), 529–543.
- Butterworth's UK Tax Guide 1987–88, 6th ed. London, 1987.
- Cutler, David M., Poterba, James M. and Summers, Lawrence H. “What Moves Stock Prices?” Journal of Portfolio Management (1989, forthcoming).
- DeLong, J. Bradford, Shleifer, Andrei, Summers, Lawrence H. and Waldmann, Robert J. “The Economic Consequences of Noise Traders.” Harvard mimeo, 1988.
- Fama, Eugene and French, Kenneth. “Permanent and Transitory Components of Stock Prices.” Journal of Political Economy (1988), 246–273.
- French, Kenneth and Roll, Richard. “Stock Return Variances: The Arrival of Information and the Reaction of Traders.” Journal of Financial Economics (1987), 5–26.
- JensenMichael C. “Symposium on Some Anomalous Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics 6 (June/September 1978), 95–101.
- Joint Committee on Taxation. “Staff Memorandum on the Imposition of Security Transaction Taxes.” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987.
- KeynesJohn Maynard. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1936.
- Kyle, Pete. “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica (1985), 1315–1336.
- New York Stock Exchange. Fact Book. 1988.
- Roll, Richard. “Orange Juice and Weather.” American Economic Review (1984), 861–880.
- Roll, Richard. “R-Squared.” Journal of Finance (1988).
- Poterba, James M. and Summers, Lawrence H. “Mean Reversion in Stock Prices: Evidence and Implications.” Journal of Financial Economics (1988).
- Scott, Thomas and Mehta, Nik. “The U.K.'s New Tax on Securities.” International Financial Law Review(December 1986).
- Shiller, Robert. “Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Dividends?” American Economic Review (1981), 421–436.
- . “Stock Prices and Social Dynamics.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2 (1984), 457–498.
- Summers, Lawrence H. “Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?” Journal of Finance(1986), 591–601.
- Tobin, James. “On the Efficiency of the Financial System.” Lloyds Bank Review (July 1984).
- Tobin, James. “A Proposal for International Monetary Reform.” Eastern Economic Review (1978), 153–159.
- When financial markets work too well: A cautious case for a securities transactions tax
Journal of Financial Services Research
Volume 3, Issue 2-3 , pp 261-286
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors