, Volume 57, Issue 2-3, pp 91-101

Patterns and mechanisms of plant succession after fire on Artemisia-grass sites in southeastern Idaho

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


Cover data for plant species on eight environmentally similar sites that were each burned in a different year (from 2 to 36 years ago) were used to construct a composite sequence of vegetational change after fire on Artemisia-grassland sites in southeastern Idaho. Some species were early successional such as Lithospermum ruderale, and some late successional: Artemisia tridentata, A. tripartita, and Gutierreza sarothrae. But many species: Purshia tridentata, Symphoricarpos oreophilus, Amelanchier alnifolia, Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus, Achillea millefolium, Agropyron dasystachyum, and A. spicatum were present in both early and later stages. Shannon and Simpson indices of diversity and species richness indicated little change in alpha diversity through time. This was attributed mainly to the limited change in species composition from early to later stages. The general pattern of succession is compatible with the tolerance model of Connell & Slatyer (1977) in most respects. Species traits relating to persistence through a disturbance or re-establishment on the site, and tolerance of competition shape the course of succession on a site. Perennial grasses and forbs which sprout from the base after fire are the first species to dominate the sites. Sprouting shrubs, which require some years to regrow to their pre-fire form, are prominent by the sixth year. Shrubs which rely on dispersal become co-dominants in later stages, at which time some herbaceous species are reduced oreliminated. The pattern of succession can differ due to presence or absence of species with particular traits.

Nomenclature follows Hitchcock & Cronquist (1973).
Acknowledgements: I would like to thank J. E. Anderson for early advice on this project and comments on the manuscript; C. Nimz and G. M. Marlette for assistance in computerized data analysis; M. Jensen for donating his expertise as a soil scientist; and A. Clark for typing. S. P. Bratton, D. A. Floyd, A. Hale, J. H. K. Pechmann and M. Petelle made comments on drafts of this manuscript.