Can the theory of evolution be falsified?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this paper we discuss the epistemological positions of evolution theories. A sharp distinction is made between the theory that species evolved from common ancestors along specified lines of descent (here called “the theory of common descent”), and the theories intended as causal explanations of evolution (e.g. Lamarck's and Darwin's theory). The theory of common descent permits a large number of predictions of new results that would be improbable without evolution. For instance, (a) phylogenetic trees have been validated now; (b) the observed order in fossils of new species discovered since Darwin's time could be predicted from the theory of common descent; (c) owing to the theory of common descent, the degrees of similarity and difference in newly discovered properties of more or less related species could be predicted. Such observations can be regarded as attempts to falsify the theory of common descent. We conclude that the theory of common descent is an easily-falsifiable & often-tested & still-not-falsified theory, which is the strongest predicate a theory in an empirical science can obtain. Theories intended as causal explanations of evolution can be falsified essentially, and Lamarck's theory has been falsified actually. Several elements of Darwin's theory have been modified or falsified: new versions of a theory of evolution by natural selection are now the leading scientific theories on evolution. We have argued that the theory of common descent and Darwinism are ordinary, falsifiable scientific theories.
- Ayala, F.J. (1978). The mechanism of evolution. - Scientific Amer. 239(3): 48–61.
- Bunge, M. (1974). Treatise on basic philosophy, Vol. 1: Sense and reference. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy, Vol. 3: Ontology I. The furniture of the world. - Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Feldman, M.W., Chen, K.H., and Dornbusch, S.M. (1982). Theory and observation in cultural transmission. Science 218: 19–27.
- DeGroot, A.D. (1969). Methodology: Foundations of inference and research in the behavioral sciences. - 's-Gravenhage: Mouton.
- Greyson, B. (1983). The near-death experience scale: Construction, reliability, and validity. J. nerv. ment. Dis. 171: 369–375.
- Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I & II. J. theor. Biol. 7: 1–52.
- Hempel, C.G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. - New York: Free Press.
- Hrdy, S.B. (1979). Infanticide among animals: A review — classification and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1: 13–40.
- Kimura, M. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217: 624–626.
- King, J.L., and Jukes, T.H. (1968). Non-Darwinian evolution. - Science 164: 788–798.
- Ligon, J.D., and Ligon, S.H. (1982). The cooperative breeding behavior of the green woodhoopoe. - Scientific Amer. 247(1): 106–114.
- Malcolm, N. (1963). Knowledge and certainty. - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
- Nature, editorial. (1981). How true is the theory of evolution? - Nature 290: 75–76.
- New Scientist, editorial. (1982). The creation of an evolving science. - New Scientist 93: 58.
- Numbers, R.L. (1982). Creationism in 20th-century America. - Science 218: 538–544.
- Popper, K.R. (1972). The logic of scientific discovery, 6th revised ed. - London: Hutchinson.
- Popper, K.R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Popper, K.R. (1976). Unended quest. - London: Fontana Collins.
- Ridley, M. (1982). How to explain organic diversity. - New Scientist 94: 359–361.
- Rootbernstein, R. (1981). Letter to Science. - Science 212: 1446–1448.
- Ruse, M. (1981). Darwin's theory: An exercise in science. - New Scientist 90: 828–830.
- Ruse, M. (1982). Creation science: The ultimate fraud. - New Scientist 94: 586–591.
- Schmidt, M. (1982). Albert Speer: Das Ende eines Mythos. - München: Scherz-Verlag.
- Spitzer, R.L., Fleiss, J.L., and Endicott, J. (1978). Problems of classification: Reliability and validity. In M.A. Lipton, A. DiMascio and K.F. Killam (Eds.), Psychopharmacology: A generation of progress. - New York: Raven Press.
- Van Dongen, P.A.M. (1981). The human locus coeruleus in neurology and psychiatry. - Prog. Neurobiol. 17: 97–139.
- Van Dongen, P.A.M., and Van den Bercken, J.H.L. (1981). Structure and function in neurobiology: An conceptual framework and the localization of functions. - Int. J. Neurosci. 15: 49–68.
- Van Waesberghe, H. (1982). Towards an alternative evolution model. - Acta biother. 31: 3–28.
- Washburn, S.L. (1978). The evolution of man. - Scientific Amer. 239(3): 146–154.
- Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology. - Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard.
- Yunis, J.J., and Prakash, O. (1982). The origin of man: A chromosomal pictorial legacy. - Science 215: 1525–1530.
- Can the theory of evolution be falsified?
Volume 33, Issue 1 , pp 35-50
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers
- Additional Links
- philosophy of science