, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 147–167

Denitrification measurements in aquatic sediments: A comparison of three methods

  • Sybil P. Seitzinger
  • Lars Peter Nielsen
  • Jane Caffrey
  • Peter Bondo Christensen

DOI: 10.1007/BF00023750

Cite this article as:
Seitzinger, S.P., Nielsen, L.P., Caffrey, J. et al. Biogeochemistry (1993) 23: 147. doi:10.1007/BF00023750


Measurements of denitrification using the acetylene inhibition,15N isotope tracer, and N2 flux methods were carried out concurrently using sediment cores from Vilhelmsborg sø, Denmark, in an attempt to clarify some of the limitations of each technique. Three experimental treatments of overlying water were used: control, nitrate enriched, and ammonia enriched water. The N2 flux and15N tracer experiments showed high rates of coupled nitrification/denitrification in the sediments. The acetylene inhibition method did not capture any coupled nitrification/denitrification. This could be explained by acetylene inhibition of nitrification. A combined15N tracer/acetylene inhibition experiment demonstrated that acetylene inhibition of N2O reduction was incomplete and the method, therefore, only measured approximately 50% of the denitrification due to nitrate from the overlying water. Similar rates of denitrification due to nitrate in the overlying water were measured by the N2 flux method and the acetylene inhibition method, after correcting for the 50% efficiency of acetylene inhibition. Rates of denitrification due to nitrate from the overlying water measured by the15N tracer method, however, were only approximately 35% or less of those measured by the acetylene inhibition or N2 flux methods.

Key words

acetylene blockaquatic sedimentsdenitrificationN cycling15NN2-flux

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sybil P. Seitzinger
    • 1
  • Lars Peter Nielsen
    • 2
  • Jane Caffrey
    • 3
  • Peter Bondo Christensen
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Environmental ResearchAcademy of Natural SciencesPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and GeneticsUniversity of AarhusNy Munkegade, Aarhus CDenmark
  3. 3.US Geological SurveyMenlo ParkUSA
  4. 4.Division of Freshwater EcologyNational Environmental Research InstituteSilkeborgDenmark