Microdistribution of benthic invertebrates in a rocky mountain (U.S.A.) stream
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A study of the benthic invertebrate community inhabiting a small, foothill trout stream in the Rocky Mountains of Idaho was conducted over a two-year period. Monthly Hess samples and short-term experiments using substratum-filled trays were used to describe the spatial dispersion of the benthos and to examine the response of invertebrate populations to substratum and current. A method was devised for measuring available surface area which involved coating individual stones with latex and measuring the area of the ‘print’ resulting from inking the impression left on the latex mold.
The dispersion of all populations was clumped throughout the year. Alteration of the cross-sectional pattern of current velocity and stream bed composition changed the pattern of distribution but not the extent of clumping. Collections made in areas of depositing and eroding substrata revealed a more diverse fauna in the latter. Most groups of organisms found in the riffle were scarcer in the pools or absent from them. The pool fauna contained no important additions over those found in the riffles.
After a year's study of invertebrate populations in an otherwise undisturbed riffle, the substratum was altered and the flow made more uniform; an increase in the abundance of most of the benthic invertebrates followed. No single factor was responsible for the increase, but the change in substratum size and degree of compaction accounted for most of the change. Interpretation of the results was aided by findings from experiments using substratum-filled trays.
Two series of stream experiments using the trays were conducted: one to test the relative importance of current and substratum and the other to test the effect of particle size on the distribution of the benthic fauna. In the first series, placement of trays of stones in a pool resulted in an increase in numbers of some but not all of the invertebrates over numbers usually occurring in the pool. Trays filled with stones and placed in a riffle supported fewer animals than found on the adjacent stream bed but more than in the pool. Variations are attributed to differences in current velocity and amounts of imported organic and inorganic debris. Three different relationships of population numbers to current velocity were found for different members of the community (direct, indirect, and parabolic) over the range of 10 to 60 cm/sec. The second series of experiments consisted of two sets of trays filled with stones of medium or large pebbles, respectively. Nine taxa, as well as all of the combined taxa, showed a preference for trays of small stones over the natural stream bed. A few taxa were noticeably more abundant on the small substratum than on the large but most of the fauna showed only slight increases in numbers or remained constant on the two substrata. Only three taxa showed a direct relation of numbers to total surface area presented by the stones.
Number and kinds of organisms found in trays filled with a uniform size of substratum did not correspond to those taken in Hess samples from the natural stream bed. This has important implications in terms of currently recommended pollution monitoring techniques. However, it is suggested that if the substratum composition of the trays more nearly matched that of the stream, the correspondence would be much better. The results of the present study also throw considerable doubt on the adequacy of generalizations derived from earlier studies of responses to substratum size and suggest several reasons for reevaluating current ideas regarding the influence of substratum on invertebrate distribution.
- Allen, K. R. 1959. The distribution of stream bottom faunas. Proc. New Zealand Ecol. Soc. 6: 5–8.
- Ambühl, H. 1959. Die Bedeutung der Strömung als ökologischer Faktor. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 21: 133–264.
- Barber, W. E. & Kevern, N. R. 1973. Ecological factors influencing macroinvertebrate standing crop distribution. Hydrobiologia 43: 53–75.
- Bell, H. L. 1969. Effect of substrate types on aquatic insect distribution. J. Minn. Acad. Sci. 35: 79–81.
- Calow, P. 1972. A method for determining the surface areas of stones to enable quantitative density estimates of littoral stone-dwelling organisms to be made. Hydrobiologia 40: 37–50.
- Chutter, F. M. 1969. The distribution of some stream invertebrates in relation to current speed. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 54: 413–422.
- Chutter, F. M. & Noble, R. G. 1966. The reliability of a method of sampling stream invertebrates. Arch. Hydrobiol. 62: 95–103.
- Cianficconi, F. & Riatti, M. 1957. Impiego di pietre artificiali per l'analisi quantitativa delle colonizzazioni faunistiche dei fondi potamici. Boll. Pesca Piscic. Idrobiol. 12: 299–335.
- Crossman, J. S. & Cairns, J. Jr. 1974. A comparative study between two different artificial substrate samplers and regular sampling techniques. Hydrobiologia 44: 517–522.
- Cummins, K. W. 1962. An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic waters. Amer. Midl. Nat. 67: 477–504.
- Cummins, K. W. 1964. Factors limiting the microdistribution of larvae of the caddisflies Pycnopsyche lepida (Hagen) and Pycnopsyche guttifer (Walker) in a Michigan stream. Ecol. Monogr. 34: 271–295.
- Cummins, K. W. & Lauff, G. H. 1969. The influence of substrate particle size on the microdistribution of stream macrobenthos. Hydrobiologia 34: 145–181.
- Edington, J. M. 1968. Habitat preferences in net-spinning caddis larvae with special reference to the influence of water velocity. J. Anim. Ecol. 37: 675–692.
- Egglishaw, H. J. 1964. The distributional relationship between the bottom fauna and plant detritus in streams. J. Anim. Ecol. 33: 463–476.
- Egglishaw, H. J. 1969. The distribution of benthic invertebrates on substrata in fast-flowing streams. J. Anim. Ecol. 38: 19–33.
- Elliott, J. M. 1971. Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Freshwat. Biol. Assoc. Sci. Publ. No. 25. 148 p.
- Henson, E. B., Jr. 1965. A cage sampler for collecting aquatic fauna. Turtox News 43: 298–299.
- Hilsenhoff, W. L. 1969. An artificial substrate device for sampling benthic stream invertebrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14: 465–471.
- Hughes, D. A. 1966. Mountain streams of the Barberton area, Eastern Transvaal. Part 2. The effect of vegetational shading and direct illumination on the distribution of stream fauna. Hydrobiologia 27: 439–459.
- Hynes, H. B. N. 1970. The ecology of running waters. Univ. Toronto Press. 555 p.
- Jaag, O. & Ambühl, H. 1964. The effect of the current on the composition of biocoenoses in flowing water streams. pp. 31–49 In Int. Conf. Wat. Pollut. Res. Lond. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
- Lillehammer, A. 1966. Bottom fauna investigations in a Norwegian river. The influence of ecological factors. Nytt. Mag. Zool. 13: 10–29.
- Linduska, J. P. 1942. Bottom type as a factor influencing the local distribution of mayfly nymphs. Can. Ent. 74: 26–30.
- Mason, W. T., Jr., Anderson, J. B. & Morrison, G. E. 1967. Limestone-filled, artificial substrate sampler. Float unit for collecting macro invertebrates in large streams. Progr. Fish Cult. 29: 74.
- Mason, W. T., Jr., Weber, G. I., Lewis, P. A. & Julian, E. C. 1973. Factors affecting the performance of basket and multiplate macro invertebrate samplers. Freshwat. Biol. 3: 409–436.
- Minshall, G. W. & Andrews, D. A. 1973. An ecological investigation of the Portneuf River, Idaho: a semiarid-land stream subjected to pollution. Freshwat. Biol. 3: 1–30.
- Moon, H. P. 1935a. Methods and apparatus suitable for an investigation of the littoral region of oligotrophic lakes. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 32: 319–333.
- Moon, H. P. 1935b. Flood movements of the littoral fauna of Windermere J. Anim. Ecol. 4: 216–228.
- Moon, H. P. 1939. Aspects of the ecology of aquatic insects. Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. 6: 39–49.
- Moon, H. P. 1940. An investigation of the movements of freshwater faunas. J. Anim. Ecol. 9: 76–83.
- Mottley, C. M., Rayner, H. J. & Rainwater, R. H. 1938. The determination of the food grade of streams. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 68: 336–343.
- Needham, P. R. 1938. Trout streams. Comstock Publ. Co., Inc., Ithaca, N.Y. 233 p.
- Needham, P. R. & Usinger, R. L. 1956. Variability in the macrofauna of a single riffle in Prosser Creek, California, as indicated by the Surber sampler. Hilgardia 24: 383–409.
- Paterson, C. G. & Fernando, C. H. 1971. Studies on the spatial heterogeneity of shallow water benthos with particular reference to the Chironomidae. Can. J. Zool. 49: 1013–1019.
- Pennak, R. W. & Van Gerpen, E. D. 1947. Bottom fauna production and physical nature of the substrate in a northern Colorado trout stream. Ecology 28: 42–48.
- Percival, E. & Whitehead, H. 1929. A quantitative study of the fauna of some types of stream-bed. J. Ecol. 17: 282–314.
- Rabeni, C. F. & Minshall, G. W. 1977. Factors affecting the microdistribution of benthic insects. Oikos (in press).
- Scott, D. 1958. Ecological studies on the Trichoptera of the River Dean, Cheshire. Arch. Hydrobiol. 54: 340–392.
- Scott, D. 1960. Cover on river bottoms. Nature 188: 76–77.
- Scott, D. 1966. The substrate cover-fraction concept in benthic ecology. Pp. 75–78. In K. W. Cummins, C. A. Tryon, and R. T. Hartman (ed.) Organism-substrate relationships in streams. Publ. Pymatuning Lab. Ecol., Univ. Pittsburg. No. 4. 145 P.
- Scott, D. & Rushforth, J. M. 1959. Cover on river bottoms. Nature 183: 836–837.
- Slack, K. V., Averett, R. C., Greeson, P. E. & Lipscomb. R. G. 1973. Methods for collection and analysis of aquatic biological and microbiological samples. U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. Water-Resources Inv. BK 5, Chap. A4 165 p.
- Sprules, W. M. 1947. An ecological investigation of stream insects in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Univ. Toronto Stud. Biol. No. 56. Publ. Ont. Fish. Res. Lab. 69: 1–181.
- Tarzwell, C. M. 1936. Experimental evidence on the value of trout stream improvement in Michigan. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 66: 177–187.
- Thorup, J. 1966. Substrate type and its value as a basis for the delimitation of bottom fauna communities in running waters. pp. 59–74. In K. W. Cummins, C. A. Tryon, and R. T. Hartman (eds.). Organism-substrate relationships in streams. Publ. Pymatuning Lab. Ecol., Univ. Pittsburg. No. 4. 145 p.
- Ulfstrand, S. 1967. Microdistribution of benthic species (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Diptera: Simuliidae) in Lapland streams. Oikos 18: 293–310.
- Ulfstrand, S. 1968. Benthic animal communities in Lapland streams. A field study with particular reference to Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and Diptera: Simuliidae. Oikos Suppl. 10: 1–120.
- Ulfstrand, S., Nilsson, L. M. & Stergar, A. 1974. Composition and diversity of benthic species collectives colonizing implanted substrates in a South Swedish stream. Ent. Scand. 5: 115–122.
- Waters, T. F. & Knapp, R. J. 1961. An improved stream bottom fauna sampler. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 90: 225–226.
- Wene, G. & Wickliff, E. L. 1940. Modification of a stream bottom and its effect on the insect fauna. Can. Ent. 72: 131–135.
- Williams, N. E. & Hynes, H. B. N. 1973. Microdistribution and feeding of the net-spinning caddisflies (Trichoptera) of a Canadian stream. Oikos 24: 73–84.
- Microdistribution of benthic invertebrates in a rocky mountain (U.S.A.) stream
Volume 55, Issue 3 , pp 231-249
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Benthic invertebrates
- Industry Sectors