Skip to main content
Log in

Trust and Extra Effort Implementing Curriculum Reform: The Mediating Effects of Collaboration

  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between trust and extra effort implementing reform, and relationship between trust and extra effort are mediated by collaboration. The study was carried out in elementary schools in Turkey. Faculty trust in schools was measured using the Omnibus T-Scale, collaboration was measured using collaboration scale, and extra effort to implement reform was measured using extra effort inventory. In this study, it was found that the trust in principal had indirectly effect on extra effort implementing reform through collaboration with principal, whereas trust in colleague had both directly and indirectly effect on extra effort via collaboration with colleague.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asgari, A., Silong, A. D., Ahmad, A., & Samah, B. A. (2008). The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors, organizational support, trust in management and organizational citizenship behaviors. European Journal of Scientific Research, 23(2), 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belogolovsky, E., & Somech, A. (2010). Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role bahavior from perspective of teachers, principals and parents. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 914–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, W. H., Miles, E. W., & Grover, S. L. (2003). Does one good turn deserve another? Coworker influences on employee citizenship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewstre, C., & Railsback, J. (2003). Building trusting relationships for school improvement: Implications for principals and teachers. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, H. H., Lester, W., Korsgaard, A., & Dinen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Management, 35(2), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., Comburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary school: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerit, Y. (2009). The relationship between trust and collaboration. The Journal of Uludag University Education Faculty, 22(2), 637–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M., & James, C. (2006). Collaboration for school improvement: A resource dependency and institutional framework of analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(1), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correnti, R., & Rowan, B. (2007). Opening up the black box: Literacy instruction in schools participating in three comprehensive school reform programs. American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 298–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosner, S. (2009). Building organizational capacity through trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 248–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, A. J. (2009). Rigid response in an age of accountability the potential of leadership and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 168–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, A. J., Moolenaar, N. M., Bolivar, J. M., & Burke, P. (2010). Relationships in reform: The role of teachers’ social networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(3), 359–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. E. (2001). Managing and guiding school reform: Leadership in success for all schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 219–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identify. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 677–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic finding and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (2004). The problem with constructivism. The Educational Forum, 68(4), 306–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, C. D., & McCauley, M. T. (2002). Creating urban classroom communities worthy of trust. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erturk, A. (2007). Increasing organizational citizenship behaviors of Turkish academicians. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, H. E. (2005). Analysis of teachers’ concerns in selected Alabama public schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(2), 152–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10(2), 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilder, D. (2003). Commitment, trust and work behaviour. Personnel Review, 32(5), 588–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). The relationship of trust to student achievement in urban elementary schools: A multilevel analysis. Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R. (2004). Organizational trustworthiness: Findings from the population of organizational ethnographies. Organization Science, 15(4), 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools. In W. K. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing schools (pp. 181–207). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C., Lavy, K. S., Chen, N. F., & Tjosyold, D. (2008). The role of co-operation and competition on leader-member exchange and extra-role performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. W. (2003). A study of the relationships between trust and collaboration in Korean metropolitian schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(12), 3114368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. A., & Paddison, P. (2000). Trust and collaborative planning theory: The case of the Scottish planning system. International Planning Studies, 5(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, M. S., & Forret, M. (2008). Exchange relationships at work: An examination of the relationship between team-member exchange and supervisor reports of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(4), 342–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, R. B., Meyer, M., & Northfield, S. (2004). Trust and its role in principal succession: A preliminary examination of a continuum of trust. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(4), 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moye, M., Henkin, A., & Egley, R. J. (2005). Teacher–principal relationships exploring linkages between empowerment and interpersonal trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(3), 260–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. Y., & Van Dyne, L. (2005). Antecedents and performance consequences of helping behavior in work groups. Group & Organization Management, 30, 514–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, N., Demirtas, H., Ustuner, M., & Comert, M. (2006). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions regarding organizational trust. Journal of Ege Education, 7(1), 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), The international handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223–1296). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychav, I., & Sharkie, R. (2010). Trust: An antecedent to employee extra-role behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. S., Bommer, W. H., & Bachrach, D. G. (2010). Operant leadership and employee citizenship: A question of trust? Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 400–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samancı, G. (2007). Organizational trust and organizational citizenship behaviour. Unpublished master’s thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon.

  • Selvi, K. (2006, September). The perceptions of classroom teachers related to the elementary curriculum. Paper presented at the 16th annual meeting of the Education Science, Mugla.

  • Singh, U., & Srivastava, K. B. L. (2009). Interpersonal trust and organizational citizenship behavior. Psychological Studies, 54, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 555–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somech, A., & Ron, I. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in schools: The impact of individual and organizational characteristics. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 38–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J., & Thompson, C. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency’s capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanghe, J., Wisse, B., & Flier, H. (2010). The role of group member affect in the relationship between trust and cooperation. British Journal of Management, 21, 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, P., Dose, J. J., & Scott, K. S. (2002). Relationships between accountability, job satisfaction, and trust. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(3), 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 308–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). Fostering organizational citizenship: Transformational leadership and trust. In W. K. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing schools (pp. 157–179). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanHoutte, M. (2006). Tracking and teacher satisfaction: Role of study culture and trust. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wat, D., & Shaffer, M. A. (2005). Equity and relationship quality influences on organizational citizenship behaviors. Personnel Review, 34(4), 406–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Y. T., Ngo, H. Y., & Wong, C. S. (2006). Perceived organizational justice, trust, and OCB: A study of Chinese workers in joint ventures and state-owned enterprises. Journal of World Business, 41, 344–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, H., Lee, J. C., & Jin, Y. (2011). Teacher receptivity to curriculum reform and the need for trust: An exploratory study from Southwest China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (2003). Educational reform and transformation in Russia. European Education, 35(1), 58–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Cerit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cerit, Y. Trust and Extra Effort Implementing Curriculum Reform: The Mediating Effects of Collaboration. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 22, 247–255 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0018-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0018-0

Keywords

Navigation