Skip to main content
Log in

Aripiprazole for the Treatment and Prevention of Acute Manic and Mixed Episodes in Bipolar I Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal

  • Review Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of its single technology process, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturers of aripiprazole (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. and Bristol Myers Squibb) to submit evidence of the clinical and cost effectiveness of aripiprazole for the treatment and prevention of acute manic and mixed episodes in bipolar I disorder in children and adolescents. The School of Health and Related Research Technology Appraisal Group at the University of Sheffield was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). The ERG produced a critical review of the evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of the technology, based upon the manufacturers’ submission to NICE. The evidence, which was derived mainly from a double-blind, phase III, placebo-controlled trial of aripiprazole in patients aged 10–17 years, showed that aripiprazole performed significantly better than placebo in reducing mania according to the primary outcome measurement (the Young Mania Rating Scale at 4 weeks). Safety outcomes indicated that aripiprazole was significantly more likely to cause extrapyramidal symptoms and somnolence than placebo. The manufacturers also presented a network meta-analysis of aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics commonly used to treat manic episodes (olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone) to show that aripiprazole performed similarly to the comparator drugs in terms of efficacy and safety. Aripiprazole was demonstrated to perform better in safety outcomes of (1) less weight gain than olanzapine and quetiapine; and (2) less prolactin increase than olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone. Results from the manufacturers’ economic evaluation showed that use of aripiprazole second-line dominated all of the other treatment strategies that were considered. However, there was considerable uncertainty in this result, and clinical advisors indicated that the actual treatment strategy employed in practice is likely to be dependent upon the patient’s characteristics. The ERG demonstrated that if this personalised medicine resulted in improved cost effectiveness for any of the other treatment strategies, then they had the potential to dominate use of aripiprazole second-line. In conclusion, whilst a strategy including aripiprazole appeared to be cost effective relative to a strategy without it, there was not robust enough evidence to recommend a specific place for aripiprazole within the treatment pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the single technology appraisal (STA) process. 2006. 9-7-2013.

  2. Uttley L, Kearns B, Stevenson MWR, Ren S. Aripiprazole for the treatment and prevention of acute manic and mixed episodes in bipolar disorder in children and adolescents: Evidence Review Group’s report. 5-3-2013. National Institute for Heath Research: health technology assessment programme. 9-7-2013.

  3. Sculpher M. Single technology appraisal at the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(5):347–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodgers MM, Griffin S, Paulden M, Slack R, Duffy S, Ingram JR, et al. Alitretinoin for severe chronic hand eczema. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(5):351–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagust A, Greenhalgh J, Boland A, Fleeman N, McLeod C, Dickson R, et al. Cetuximab for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(6):439–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stevenson M, Pandor A. Febuxostat for the management of hyperuricaemia in patients with gout. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29(2):133–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scotland MG, Waugh N, Royle P, McNamee P, Henderson R, Hollick R. Denosumab for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in post-menopausal women. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29(11):951–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickson MR, Bagust A, Boland A, Blundell M, Davis H, Dundar Y, et al. Erlotinib monotherapy for the maintenance treatment of non-small cell lung cancer after previous platinum-containing chemotherapy. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29(12):1051–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McKenna C, Maund E, Sarowar M, Fox D, Stevenson M, Pepper C, et al. Dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(1):35–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmes M, Carroll C, Papaioannou D. Dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee surgery. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(2):137–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang H, Craig D, Epstein D, Bojke L, Light K, Bruce IN, et al. Golimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(4):257–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyers MD, Jia X, Jenkinson D, Mowatt G. Eltrombopag for the treatment of chronic immune or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(6):483–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burch J, Griffin S, McKenna C, Walker S, Paton J, Wright K, et al. Omalizumab for the treatment of severe persistent allergic asthma in children aged 611 years: a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(11):991–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Whyte S, Pandor A, Stevenson M. Bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(12):1119–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kilonzo M, Hislop J, Elders A, Fraser C, Bissett D, McClinton S, et al. Pazopanib for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(1):15–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Craig D, Rice S, Paton F, Fox D, Woolacott N. Retigabine for the adjunctive treatment of adults with partial-onset seizures in epilepsy with and without secondary generalization. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(2):101–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spackman E, Rice S, Norman G, Suh DC, Eastwood A, Palmer S. Trastuzumab for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;3:185–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rafia R, Simpson E, Stevenson M, Papaioannou D. Trabectedin for the treatment of advanced metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;6:471–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenhalgh J, Bagust A, Boland A, Blundell M, Oyee J, Beale S et al. Rituximab for the first-line maintenance treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;5:403–13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Armstrong N, Joore M, van Asselt T, Misso K, Manning N, Tomini F et al. Golimumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;5:415–25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tosh J, Archer R, Davis S, Stevenson M, Stevens JW. Golimumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;8:652–61.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kearns B, Jones ML, Stevenson M, Littlewood C. Cabazitaxel for the second-line treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;6:479–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Faria R, Spackman E, Burch J, Corbacho B, Todd D, Pepper C et al. Dabigatran for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation: a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;7:551–62.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Simpson EL, Fitzgerald P, Evans P, Tappenden P, Kalita N, Reckless JPD et al. Bivalirudin for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;4:269–75.

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Bipolar disorder (children)—aripiprazole: evaluation report. 6-6-2013. 9-7-2013.

  26. Mind tmhc. Understanding bipolar disorder. 2010. 9-7-2013.

  27. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The management of bipolar disorder in adults, children and young people, in primary and secondary care: draft for consultation. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. 2005. 12-2-2013.

  28. Pavuluri M, Birhamer B, Naylor M. Pediatric bipolar disorder: a review of the past 10 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(9):846–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. National Institute of Mental Health. Bipolar disorder in children and teens: a parent’s guide. 2008. Ref Type: Report.

  30. DelBello M, Kowatch R, Adler C, Stanford KE, Welge JA, Barzman DH, et al. A double-blind randomized pilot study comparing quetiapine and divalproex for adolescent mania. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45(3):305–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Freeman A, Youngstrom E, Michalek E, Siegel R, Meyers O, Findling R. Quality of life in pediatric bipolar disorder. Pediatrics. 2013;123:e446–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rademacher J, DelBello MP, Adler C, Stanford K, Strakowski SM. Health-related quality of life in adolescents with bipolar I disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2007;17(1):97–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Youngstrom EA, Freeman AJ, McKeown Jenkins M. The assessment of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2009;18(2):353–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Merikangas KR, Cui L, Kattan G, Carlson GA, Youngstrom EA, Angst J. Mania with and without depression in a community sample of US adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(9):943–951. http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/data/Journals/PSYCH/24834/yoa120005_943_951.pdf.

  35. Moreno C, Laje G, Blanco C, Jiang H, Schmidt A, Olfson M. National trends in the outpatient diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder in youth. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(9):1032–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. The use of unlicensed medicines or licensed medicines for unlicensed applications in paediatric practice: policy statement produced by the Joint RCPCH/NPPG Standing Committee on Medicines. 2000. 11-2-2013.

  37. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), European Medicines Agency. European Public Assessment Report: procedure no. EMEA/H/C/000471/II/0082: Aripiprazole. 2013. 12-2-2013.

  38. Findling R, Nyilas M, Forbes R, McQuade R, Jin N, Iwamoto T, et al. Acute treatment of pediatric bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed episode, with aripiprazole: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(10):1441–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tramontina S, Zeni C, Ketzer C, Pheula G, Narvaez J, Rohde L. Aripiprazole in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder comorbid with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a pilot randomized clinical trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70:756–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jing Zhang DA. FDA clinical review: Abilify: Aripiprazole: NDA 21436/SE5-021. US Food and Drug Administration. 14-2-2008. 12-2-2013.

  41. Haas M, DelBello M, Pandina G, Kushner S, Van Hove I, Augustyns I, et al. Risperidone for the treatment of acute mania in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Bipolar Disord. 2009;11:687–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. AstraZeneca. NDA 20-639/S-045 (acute schizophrenia) and S-046 (acute bipolar mania). Seroquel® (quetiapine fumarate) tablets for the treatment of pediatric patients with schizophrenia (13–17 years old) or bipolar mania (10–17 years old). Briefing document for Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting of June 9 and 10, 2009.

  43. Tohen M, Kryzhanovskaya L, Carlson G, DelBello M, Wozniak J, Kowatch R, et al. Olanzapine versus placebo in the treatment of adolescents with bipolar mania. Am J Clin Hypn. 2007;164(10):1547–56.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pavuluri M, Henry D, Findling RL, Parnes S, Carbray J, Mohammed T, et al. Double-blind randomized trial of risperidone versus divalproex in pediatric bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2010;12(6):593–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Geller B, Luby J, Joshi P, Wagner K, Emslie G, Walkup J, et al. A randomized controlled trial of risperidone, lithium, or divalproex sodium for initial treatment of bipolar disorder, manic or mixed phase, children and adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(5):515–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Buckley PF, Paulsson B, Brecher M. Treatment of agitation and aggression in bipolar mania: efficacy of quetiapine. J Affective Disord. 2007;100(Suppl 1):S33–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Laursen T, Munk-Olsen T, Nordentoft M, Mortensen P. Increased mortality among patients submitted with major psychiatric disorders: a register-based study comparing mortality in unipolar depressive disorder, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(6):899–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Office for National Statistics. Historic and projected mortality rates (qx) from the 2010-based UK life tables—principal projection. 2012.

  49. Curtis L. Unit costs of health & social care 2011. PSSRU 2011.

  50. Ara R, Brazier J. Populating an economic model with health state utility values: moving towards better practice. Health Economics and Decision Science Discussion Paper Series 2010; 09/11.

  51. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb. Aripiprazole for the treatment and prevention of acute manic episodes in bipolar disorder in children and adolescents [ID305]. 2013.

  52. Hayhurst H, Palmer S, Abbott R, Johnson T, Scott J. Measuring health-related quality of life in bipolar disorder: relationship of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) to condition-specific measures. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1271–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mangalore R. The utility approach to valuing health states in schizophrenia. Mental Health Res Rev. 2000;7:11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Boyle S, Jones G, Walters S. Physical activity, quality of life, weight status and diet in adolescents. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(7):943–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Briggs A, Wild D, Lees M, Reaney M, Dursun S, Parry D et al. Impact of schizophrenia and schizophrenia treatment-related adverse events on quality of life: direct utility elicitation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:105.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Heeg B, Buskens E, Botteman M, Caleo S, Ingham M, Damen J, et al. The cost-effectiveness of atypicals in the UK. Value Health. 2008;11(7):1007–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Philips Z, Bojke L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S. Good practice guidelines for decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(4):355–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Bipolar disorder (children)—aripirazole: final appraisal determination. 6-6-2013.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 09/123/01). See the HTA programme website for further project information (http://www.hta.ac.uk). This summary of the ERG report was compiled after the National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE) issued guidance.

LU drafted the final version of the manuscript and takes responsibility as the overall guarantor of the content. BK, SR and MS revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have given their approval for the final version to be published.

The authors acknowledge the clinical advice provided by Dr Bernadka Dubicka (Consultant Adolescent Psychiatrist), Dr Argyris Stringaris (Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist) and Dr Isobel Heyman (Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of NICE or the Department of Health. The authors also acknowledge Ruth Wong, who contributed to the work but did not meet the criteria for authorship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lesley Uttley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uttley, L., Kearns, B., Ren, S. et al. Aripiprazole for the Treatment and Prevention of Acute Manic and Mixed Episodes in Bipolar I Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal. PharmacoEconomics 31, 981–990 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-013-0091-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-013-0091-0

Keywords

Navigation