Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Higher sustainability performance of intensive grazing versus zero-grazing dairy systems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although grazing of dairy cows is an integral part of dairy farming in many European countries, farmers today more often choose for zero-grazing systems, where cows are housed throughout the year. Some studies already compared grazing and zero-grazing systems for specific issues such as labor efficiency, environmental impact, or animal welfare. In our study, we perform a more integrated evaluation, considering relevant ecological, economic, and social aspects. This allows for a balanced and more complete comparison of the sustainability performance of the two production methods. We evaluated ten intensive grazing and ten zero-grazing specialized Flemish dairy farms on the use of nutrients and energy, productivity and profitability, labor input, and animal welfare. In addition, we put special effort in formulating useful management advice for farmers. Therefore, we combined a detailed analysis of the sustainability indicators with an intensive interaction and discussion with farmers and farm advisors. Results show that, on average, the zero-grazing farms performed significantly worse from an ecological and economic point of view. This fact is explained mainly due to a less efficient use of concentrates and byproducts. Social sustainability performance did not differ significantly between the two groups. As a result, the integrated sustainability performance was significantly lower for the zero-grazing group. This finding shows that a further shift from intensive grazing to zero-grazing can move dairy farming in Flanders further away from sustainability. An important advice to improve the ecological and economic performance of zero-grazing farms is to optimize cows’ rations to include more forages and optimize forage production and use. More detailed site- and case-specific management advice for farmers of both groups was provided during a discussion meeting. We consider this an essential additional step to any sustainability evaluation, since progress can only be made when monitoring results are translated into practical measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arsenault N, Tyedmers P, Fredeen A (2009) Comparing the environmental impacts of pasture-based and confinement-based dairy systems in Nova Scotia (Canada) using life cycle assessment. Int J Agric Sustain 7:19–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller C, Guichard L, Makowski D, Aveline A, Girardin P, Plantureux S (2008) Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 28:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowell VA, Rennie LJ, Tierney G, Lawrence AB, Haskell MJ (2003) Relationships between building design, management system and dairy cow welfare. Anim Welf 12:547–552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coléno FC, Duru M (1999) A model to find and test decision rules for turnout date and grazing area allocation for a dairy cow system in spring. Agric Syst 61:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner DS, Campbell-Arvai V (2009) Consumer demand for pasture-raised dairy products: results from Michigan. J Soil Water Conserv 64:175–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mey K, D’Haene K, Marchand F, Meul M, Lauwers L (2011) Learning through stakeholder involvement in the implementation of MOTIFS, an integrated assessment model for sustainable farming in Flanders. Int J Agric Sustain 9:350–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas G, Wetterich F, Köpke U (2001) Comparing intensive, intensive and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell MJ, Rennie LJ, Bowell VA, Bell MJ, Lawrence AB (2006) Housing system, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 89:4259–4266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Mendo O, von Keyserlingk MAG, Veira DM, Weary DM (2007) Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 90:1209–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins TC, McGuire MA (2006) Major advances in nutrition: impact on milk composition. J Dairy Sci 89:1302–1310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen T, Soegaard K, Kristensen IS (2005) Management of grasslands in intensive dairy livestock farming. Livest Prod Sci 96:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metera E, Sakowski T, Sloniewski K, Romanowicz B (2010) Grazing as a tool to maintain biodiversity of grassland—a review. Anim Sci Paper Rep 28:315–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Meul M, Nevens F, Reheul D, Hofman G (2007) Energy use efficiency of specialised dairy, arable and pig farms in Flanders. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meul M, Van Passel S, Nevens F, Dessein J, Rogge E, Mulier A, Van Hauwermeiren A (2008) MOTIFS: a monitoring tool for integrated farm sustainability. Agron Sustain Dev 28:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meul M, Nevens F, Reheul D (2009) Validating sustainability indicators: focus on ecological aspects of Flemish dairy farms. Ecol Indic 9:284–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevens F, Verbruggen I, Reheul D, Hofman G (2006) Farm gate nitrogen surpluses and nitrogen use efficiency of specialized dairy farms in Flanders: evolution and future goals. Agric Syst 88:142–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmos G, Boyle L, Hanlon A, Patton J, Murphy JJ, Mee JF (2009) Hoof disorders, locomotion ability and lying times of cubicle-housed compared to pasture-based dairy cows. Livest Sci 125:199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons RL, Luloff AE, Hanson GD (2004) Can we identify key characteristics associated with grazing-management dairy systems from survey data? J Dairy Sci 87:2748–2760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Platteau J, Van Gijseghem D, Van Bogaert T (eds) (2010) Landbouwrapport 2010. Departement Landbouw en Visserij, Brussel

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs PFMM, Vogelzang TA, Kroeze GH, Schotanus L (2005) Verbetering arbeidsefficiëntie op vier melkveebedrijven. Agrotechnology & Food Innovations, Wageningen UR

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling N (2009) Pathways for impact: scientists’ different perspectives on agricultural innovation. Int J Agric Sustain 7:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotz CA, Taube F, Russelle MP, Oenema J, Sanderson MA, Wachendorf M (2005) Whole-farm perspectives of nutrient flows in grassland agriculture. Crop Sci 45:2139–2159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schellekens A, Van de Ven G, De Campeneere S, De Caesteker E, Ryckaert I, Rombouts G (2008) Bewust beperkt beweiden: Beter voor koe en boer? Brochure Voedergewassen 2008–Oogstjaar 2007. Landbouwcentrum voor Voedergewassen, pp 87–92

  • Sobry L, Goossens X, Opsomer G, Nevens F, De Smet S, Ödberg F, Maes D, Lommelen F, Tuyttens F, Geers R (2005) Hoe wel zijn mijn koeien? Evaluatie van dierenwelzijn en—gezondheid op melkveebedrijven. Steunpunt Duurzame Landbouw, Gontrode

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano FD, Polan CE, Miller CN (2001) Supplementing pasture to lactating Holsteins fed a total mixed ration diet. J Dairy Sci 84:2460–2468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spörndly E, Wredle E (2004) Automatic milking and grazing—effects of distance to pasture and level of supplements on milk yield and cow behavior. J Dairy Sci 87:1702–1712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen MA, van Calker KJ, Smits MCJ, Iepema GL, de Boer IJM (2008) Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in The Netherlands. Agric Syst 96:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Passel S, Meul M (2012) Multilevel and multi-user sustainability assessment of farming systems. Environ Impact Assess Rev 32:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren AM, Van Den Pol-Van Dasselaar A (2006) Grazing systems and feed supplementation. In: Elgersma A, Dijkstra J, Tamminga S (eds) Fresh herbage for dairy cattle. Springer, pp 85–101

  • von Keyserlingk MAG, Rushen J, de Passillé AM, Weary DM (2009) The welfare of dairy cattle—key concepts and the role of science. J Dairy Sci 92:4101–4111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead DC (1995) Grassland nitrogen. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann A (2008) Optimization of sustainable dairy-cow feeding systems with an economic-ecological LP farm model using various optimization processes. J Sustain Agric 32:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marijke Meul.

About this article

Cite this article

Meul, M., Van Passel, S., Fremaut, D. et al. Higher sustainability performance of intensive grazing versus zero-grazing dairy systems. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 629–638 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0074-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0074-5

Keywords

Navigation