Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examining the Antecedents of U.S. Nonmarital Fatherhood

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Despite the dramatic rise in U.S. nonmarital childbearing in recent decades, limited attention has been paid to factors affecting nonmarital fatherhood (beyond studies of young fathers). In this article, we use data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 cohort to examine the antecedents of nonmarital fatherhood, as compared to marital fatherhood. Overall, we find the strongest support across both data sets for education and race/ethnicity as key predictors of having a nonmarital first birth, consistent with prior literature about women’s nonmarital childbearing and about men’s early/teenage fatherhood. Education is inversely related to the risk of nonmarital fatherhood, and minority (especially black) men are much more likely to have a child outside of marriage than white men. We find little evidence that employment predicts nonmarital fertility, although it does strongly (and positively) predict marital fertility. High predicted earnings are also associated with a greater likelihood of marital childbearing but with a lower likelihood of nonmarital childbearing. Given the socioeconomic disadvantage associated with nonmarital fatherhood, this research suggests that nonmarital fatherhood may be an important aspect of growing U.S. inequality and stratification both within and across generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term “father” throughout this article to indicate biological fatherhood. The social role of fathers in family life is also an important topic, but we do not address it here.

  2. Nonmarital childbearing is closely related to unintended childbearing (Musick 2002); we focus on nonmarital births because we are substantively interested in the marital context of childbearing and because data on intendedness in the NSFG and NLSY are not available for all men.

  3. The NSFG suggests weighting regressions but says it is acceptable to estimate unweighted regressions. The NLSY recommends not weighting regressions. To be consistent, we estimate unweighted regressions for both.

  4. The NLSY excluded institutionalized individuals at the time of sampling but follows respondents if they become incarcerated or enter the military.

  5. Similar attitudinal measures are available in the NSFG but only at the time of interview. We do not use such measures because they could be endogenous to having become a father.

  6. Wu and Martin (2013) noted the importance of separately considering factors that affect age of sexual onset and that affect the risk of a premarital birth given onset—though they found that variability in the former has a much smaller influence on premarital birth probabilities than differences in the latter. Because our focus here is to provide a descriptive portrait of the factors related to nonmarital fatherhood (rather than to evaluate the mechanisms), we include all men and use control variables to represent the timing of sexual initiation.

  7. The NLSY dropped the age of sexual initiation question after 1985, but very few of the men had not had sex by that time.

  8. In additional analyses (not shown), we estimated models using data only through 1994—hence, not imputing the 1994–2006 odd-numbered years. The results were nearly identical to our main results through 2006, so we present results for the full 1979–2006 period in order to capture a greater proportion of births to this cohort.

  9. We present results using the imputed data in our tables, but we also estimated models using complete cases only, and the results were nearly identical.

  10. We do not censor at marriage because we are interested in the outcome of first nonmarital birth. Although it is not common, men could be married and divorced and then have a nonmarital birth.

  11. Differences discussed in this section about Tables 1 and 2 are all statistically significant based on multiple-comparison tests or t tests (p < .05).

  12. We also estimated models using respondents’ actual earnings (lagged by one year) instead of predicted earnings (results not shown); none of the actual earnings variables were significantly related to nonmarital births (although the direction was also negative), but high actual earnings were similarly significantly and positively related to marital births.

  13. Our results for the age 14–16 NLSY subsample (not shown) are mostly similar to the total NLSY sample, suggesting that left-censoring is not a major source of bias in our analyses; some coefficients in the subsample do not reach statistical significance, although the magnitudes are similar. The most notable substantive difference is that ever being incarcerated is associated with a diminished chance of a marital birth only in the subsample.

  14. We include only births to age 40, given that few births occur after that age, and the estimates thereafter become unreliable because of small cell sizes.

  15. Similar patterns are observed when the respondent’s father’s education is used instead of respondent’s education.

  16. We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting these useful points.

References

  • Aassve, A. (2003). The impact of economic resources on premarital childbearing and subsequent marriage among young American women. Demography, 40, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1989). Sex codes and family life among poor inner-city youths. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 501, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (2000). The transformation in the meaning of marriage. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind (pp. 147–165). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–231). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Human Resource Research. (2006). NLSY users guide: A guide to the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Columbus: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Human Resource Research. (2008). NLSY users guide: A guide to the 1979–2006 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Data. Columbus: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J., Cross-Barnet, C., Burton, L. M., & Garrett-Peters, R. (2008). Promises they can keep: Low-income women’s attitudes toward motherhood, marriage, and divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 919–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Reed, J. (2007). Forming fragile families: Was the baby planned, unplanned, or in between? In P. England & K. Edin (Eds.), Unmarried couples with children (pp. 25–54). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo, I. T., King, R. B., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (1999). Adolescent females: Their sexual partners and the fathers of their children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., & Weiss, C. C. (2000). Intergenerational transmission of fathering roles in at risk families. Marriage and Family Review, 29(2/3), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I., McLanahan, S. S., & Hanson, T. L. (1998). A patchwork portrait of nonresident fathers. In I. Garfinkel, S. S. McLanahan, D. R. Meyer, & J. A. Seltzer (Eds.), Fathers under fire: The revolution in child support enforcement (pp. 31–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geronimus, A. T., & Korenman, S. (1992). The socioeconomic consequences of teen childbearing reconsidered. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 1187–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Davis, C. (2009). Money, marriage, and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formations theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, J. E., Ruf, S. D., White, M. J., & Goldscheider, F. (2006). Educational engagement and early family formation: Differences by ethnicity and generation. Social Forces, 84, 1391–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F. K., & Kaufman, G. (1996). Fertility and commitment: Bringing men back in. Population and Development Review, 22, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. E., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2000). Absent and problematic men: Demographic accounts of male reproductive roles. Population and Development Review, 26, 81–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2011). Births: Preliminary data for 2010 (National Vital Statistics Reports 60(2)). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. L., Morrison, D. R., & Ginsburg, A. L. (1989). The antecedents of teenage fatherhood. Demography, 26, 579–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R., Wolfe, B., & Pence, K. (2001). Intergenerational effects of nonmarital and early childbearing. In L. L. Wu & B. Wolfe (Eds.), Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility (pp. 390–402). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Goldscheider, F. (2010). Family structure and the transition to early parenthood. Demography, 47, 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, B. M. (2007). Racial and ethnic differences in the likelihood of marriage: The effect of incarceration. Justice Quarterly, 24, 156–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, K., Joyner, K., Peters, H. E., & DeLeone, F. (2008). The transition to early fatherhood: National estimates based on multiple surveys. Demographic Research, 18(article 12), 337–376. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemmott, J. B., Jemmott, L. S., & Fong, G. T. (2010). Efficacy of a theory-based abstinence-only intervention over 24 months: A randomized controlled trial with young adolescents. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 164, 152–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, K., Peters, H. E., Hynes, K., Sikora, A., Rubenstein, J., & Rendall, M. (2012). The quality of male fertility data in major U.S. surveys. Demography, 49, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, L., Sonenstein, F. L., & Pleck, J. H. (1993). Neighborhood, family, and work: Influences on the premarital behaviors of adolescent males. Social Forces, 72, 479–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D. (1988). Marriage markets and assortative mating with household public goods: Theoretical results and empirical implications. The Journal of Human Resources, 23, 462–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R. I. (1993). A national profile of young unwed fathers. In R. I. Lerman & T. J. Ooms (Eds.), Young unwed fathers: Changing roles and emerging policies (pp. 27–51). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R., & Sorenson, E. (2000). Father involvement with their nonmarital children: Patterns, determinants, and effects on their earnings. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. D., Sonenstein, F. L., Martinez, G., & Marcotte, J. (1998). Completeness of young fathers’ reports of fertility. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 24, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopoo, L. M., & Western, B. (2005). Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist, J. H., & Smith, H. L. (2005). Family formation among women in the U.S. military: Evidence from the NLSY. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsiglio, W. (1987). Adolescent fathers in the United States: Their initial living arrangements, marital experience and educational outcomes. Family Planning Perspectives, 19, 240–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, G. M., Chandra, A., Abma, J. C., Jones, J., & Mosher, W. D. (2006). Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: Data on men and women from Cycle 6 (2002) of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (Vital and Health Statistics 23(26)). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. (2011). Family instability and complexity after a nonmarital birth: Outcomes for children in fragile families. In M. J. Carlson & P. England (Eds.), Social class and changing families in an unequal America (pp. 108–133). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R. T., & Tuma, N. B. (1985). Entry into marriage and parenthood by young men and women: The influence of family background. Demography, 22, 515–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincy, R. B., & Pouncy, H. (1999). There must be 50 ways to start a family. In W. Horn, D. Blankenhorn, & M. B. Pearlstein (Eds.), The fatherhood movement: A call to action (pp. 83–104). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincy, R. B., & Pouncy, H. (2007). Baby fathers and American family formation: Low-income, never-married parents in Louisiana before Katrina. New York: Center for Marriage and Families, Institute for American Values.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, F. L., & Gryn, T. A. (2001, March). Evaluating male fertility data: Who reports consistently and what are the analytical implications? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.

  • Moynihan, D. P. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor, Office of Policy Planning and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, C. (1995). Maternal employment, parent involvement, and mathematics achievement among adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick, K. (2002). Planned and unplanned childbearing among unmarried women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 915–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick, K., England, P., Edgington, S., & Kangas, N. (2010). Education differences in intended and unintended fertility. Social Forces, 88, 543–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (2004). Public use data file documentation National Survey of Family Growth Cycle 6: 2002. User’s guide. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. J. (2004). Low-income fathers. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 427–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. L. (1998). The consequences of premarital fatherhood. American Sociological Review, 63, 259–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pears, K. C., Pierce, S. L., Kim, H. K., Capaldi, D. M., & Owen, L. D. (2005). The timing of entry into fatherhood in young, at-risk men. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendall, M. S., Clarke, L., Peters, H. E., Ranjit, N., & Verropoulou, G. (1999). Incomplete reporting of men’s fertility in the United States and Britain: A research note. Demography, 36, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. The Stata Journal, 4, 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhm, C. (2008). Maternal employment and adolescent development. Labour Economics, 15, 958–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tach, L., Mincy, R., & Edin, K. (2010). Parenting as a package deal: Relationships, fertility, and nonresident father involvement among unmarried parents. Demography, 47, 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. (2007). Race, military service, and marital timing: Evidence from the NLSY-79. Demography, 44, 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., Smith, C. A., & Howard, G. J. (1997). Risk factors for teenage fatherhood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 505–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., & Camburn, D. (1989). Religious participation and adolescent sexual behavior and attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch, D. M., Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography, 39, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch, D. M., & McCarthy, J. (1990). The timing of a first birth and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 55, 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, S. J., & Bachrach, C. (2000). Nonmarital childbearing in the United States, 1949–99 (National Vital Statistics Reports 48(6)). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B. (2002). The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. American Sociological Review, 67, 526–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, B., & Pettit, B. (2000). Incarceration and racial inequality in men’s employment. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 54, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, W. B., & Wolfinger, N. H. (2007). Then comes marriage? Religion, race, and marriage in urban America. Social Science Research, 36, 569–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R. J. (1999). A theory of out-of-wedlock childbearing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, S33–S64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R. J. (2000). The economics of fatherhood. The American Economic Review, 90, 378–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. L., & Martin, S. P. (2013). Sexual onset and premarital first births: Insights from a sequential hazard model. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.

  • Wu, L. L., & Wolfe, B. (Eds.). (2001). Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., Raymo, J., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavodny, M. (1999). Do men’s characteristics affect whether a nonmarital pregnancy results in marriage? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 764–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate funding for this research provided by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development through a grant to the first author (R01HD57894) and through core funding to the Center for Demography and Ecology (R24HD047873), as well as additional funding by the Research Committee of the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin–Madison. An earlier version was presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America. We thank David Ribar, Professor of Economics at the University of North Carolina–Greensboro, for excellent methodological advice and guidance; and we thank Frank Furstenberg, Zellerbach Family Professor of Sociology at the University of Pennsylvania, for thoughtful conceptual input. We appreciate very helpful comments and suggestions from the Editor (Stewart Tolnay), several anonymous reviewers, and W. Bradford Wilcox as a conference discussant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Center for Demography and Ecology, and Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    Marcia J. Carlson

  2. Department of Sociology and Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Alicia G. VanOrman

  3. School of Social Work and Columbia Population Research Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Natasha V. Pilkauskas

Authors
  1. Marcia J. Carlson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alicia G. VanOrman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natasha V. Pilkauskas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcia J. Carlson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, M.J., VanOrman, A.G. & Pilkauskas, N.V. Examining the Antecedents of U.S. Nonmarital Fatherhood. Demography 50, 1421–1447 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0201-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0201-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation