Abstract
Providing cancer patients with more information regarding their treatments allows them to feel more in control, increases self efficacy, and can decrease anxiety. The aims of the present study were to develop an interprofessional group education session and to evaluate the usefulness and acceptability of this session. In addition, informational distress levels pre- and post-education were evaluated. A prostate radiation therapy (RT) education session was developed and facilitated by an interprofessional team. Topics discussed included how RT works, side effects and management, and support services available. Prior to the education session, participants reported their informational RT distress levels using the validated Distress Thermometer (DT). Post-education session, the DT was readministered. In addition, participants completed an acceptability survey to assess format, structure, and usefulness of the education session. Participants agreed that the session contained valuable and useful information helping them understand expectations during treatment, including resource availability, side effects and management, as well as procedural expectation during treatment. All stated they would recommend the session to other patients. The interprofessional nature of the sessions was deemed useful. Suggested areas for improvement included addition of a dietitian, information on long-term side effects, statistics of radiotherapy side effects, impact of radiotherapy on sexual function, and overall quality of life. The group education session significantly improved informational distress levels (p = 0.04). Educating prostate cancer patients utilizing an interprofessional group format can decrease anxiety and stress related to their RT treatment. Future development of group education sessions for other disease site groups may be valuable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klikovac T, Djurdjevic A (2010) Psychological aspects of the cancer patients’ education: thoughts, feelings, behavior and body reactions of patients faced with diagnosis of cancer. J BUON 15:153–156
Fan A (2002) Psychological and psychosocial effects of prostate cancer. Nurs Stand 17:33–37
Nelson CJ, Roth AJ, Weinberger MI (2008) Prostate cancer: psychosocial implications and management. Future Oncol 4:561
Diefenbach MA, Dorsey J, Uzzo RG, Hanks GE, Greenberg RE, Horwitz E, Newton F, Engstrom PF (2002) Decision making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 20(1):55–62
Grimm P, Billiet I, Bostwick D, Dicker AP, Frank S, Immerzeel J, Keyes M, Kupelian P, Lee WR, Machtens S, Mayadev J, Moran BJ, Merrick G, Millar J, Roach M, Stock R, Shinohara K, Scholz M, Weber E, Zietman A, Zelefsky M, Wong J, Wentworkth S, Vera R, Langley S (2012) Comparative analysis of prostate specific antigen free survival outcomes for patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treatment by radical therapy. Results from the Prostate Cancer Results Study Group. BJU Int 109(1):22–29
Canil T, Cashell A, Papdakos J, Abdelmutti N, Jusko FA (2012) Evaluation of the effects of pre-treatment education on self-efficacy and anxiety in patients receiving radiation therapy: a pilot study. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 43(4):221–227
Rutten LJF, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J (2005) Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns 57:250–261
Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J (2001) Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 84:48–51
Voigtmann K, Kollner V, Einsle F, Alheit H, Joraschky P, Herrmann T (2010) Emotional state of patients in radiotherapy and how they deal with their disorder. Strahlentherapie Onkologie 186:229–235
Schofield P, Butow P, Thompson J, Tattersall M, Beeney L, Dunn S (2003) Psychological responses of patients receiving a diagnosis of cancer. Ann Oncol 14(1):48–56
Jefford M, Tattersall MH (2002) Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care. Lancet Oncol 3:629–637
Ream E, Richardson A (1996) The role of information in patients’ adaptation to chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 5:132–138
Davis T, Williams M, Marin E, Parker R, Glass J (2002) CA Cancer J Clin 52(3):134–149
Weintraub D, Maliski SL, Fink A, Choe S, Litwin MS (2004) Suitability of prostate cancer education materials: applying a standardized assessment tool to currently available materials. Patient Educ Couns 55:275–280
Helgeson VS, Cohen S, Schulz R, Yasko J (2001) Long-term effects of educational and peer discussion group interventions on adjustment to breast cancer. Health Psychol 20:387–392
Maamoun J. A discussion of study findings regarding RT patient group education at the Odette Cancer Centre. In: Interdisciplinary radiation oncology rounds September 13, 2011; Toronto, ON
Tran C, Szumacher E, Di Prospero L (2012) A pilot study evaluating the usability and usefulness of a multi-language online patient education tool for patients undergoing radiation treatment. Findings from a student project. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 43(3):181–186
McPherson CJ, Higginson IJ, Hearn J (2001) Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health Med 23(3):227–234
Friedman AJ, Cosby R, Boyko S, Hatton-Bauer J, Turnbull G (2011) Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: a systematic review and practice guideline recommendations. J Cancer Educ 26:12–21
Theis SL, Johnson JH (1995) Strategies for teaching patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Nurse Specialist 9(2):100–120
Boberg EW, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Offord KP, Koch C, Wen K, Kreutz K, Salner A (2003) Assessing the unmet information, support and care delivery needs of men with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns 49(3):233–242
Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Barr H, Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008; Issue 1
Nguyen KD, Hara B, Chlebowski RT (2005) Utility of two cancer organization websites for a multiethnic, public hospital oncology population: comparative cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res 7(3):1–11
Teo NB, Paton P, Kettlewell S (2005) Use of an interactive web-based questionnaire to evaluate a breast cancer website. Breast 14:153–156
Patrick K, Intille SS, Zabinski MF (2005) An ecological framework for cancer communication: implications for research. J Med Internet Res 7(3):1–12
Leydon G, Boulton M, Moynihan C, Jones A, Mossman J, Boudioni M, McPherson K (2000) Cancer patients’ information needs and information seeking behavior: in depth interview study. Br Med J 320:909
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reinhart, R., D’Alimonte, L., Osmar, K. et al. Educating Our Patients Collaboratively: A Novel Interprofessional Approach. J Canc Educ 29, 382–388 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0623-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0623-0