Skip to main content
Log in

Do Better-Rated Navigators Improve Patient Satisfaction with Cancer-Related Care?

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient navigation has emerged as a promising strategy for addressing racial-ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in cancer-related care. However, little is known about the impact of patients’ perception of the quality of navigation on patient outcomes. We examined the impact of better-rated navigators on patients’ satisfaction with cancer-related care. The sample included 1,593 adults (85.8 % with abnormal cancer screening and 14.2 % with confirmed cancer diagnosis) who received patient navigation. We defined better-rated navigators as those scoring above the first quartile of mean scores on the Patient Satisfaction with Interpersonal Relationship with Navigator scale. We defined patient satisfaction based on scores above or below the median of the Patient Satisfaction with Cancer-Related Care (PSCC) scale. We controlled for patient and site characteristics using backward selection logistic regression analyses. Among patients with abnormal screening, having a better-rated navigator was associated with higher score on the PSCC (p < 0.05). After controlling for other bivariate predictors of satisfaction (e.g., age, race, income, and household size), navigation by better-rated navigators was associated with a greater likelihood of having higher patient satisfaction [odds ratio (OR), 1.38; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.05–1.82]. Similar findings between better-rated navigators and score on the PSCC were found for participants with diagnosed cancer (OR, 3.06; 95 % CI, 1.56–6.0). Patients navigated by better-rated navigators reported higher satisfaction with their cancer-related care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer Facts and Figures 2012. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman HP (2004) Poverty, culture, and social injustice: determinants of cancer disparities. CA Cancer J Clin 54(2):72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luckett T, Goldstein D, Butow PN, Gebski V, Aldridge LJ, McGrane J, Ng W, King MT (2011) Psychological morbidity and quality of life of ethnic minority patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12(13):1240–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanne JH (2012) US ethnic minorities are less likely to be screened for cancer, study finds. BMJ 344:e754. doi:10.1136/bmj.e754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman HP (2006) Patient navigation: a community centered approach to reducing cancer mortality. J Cancer Educ 21(1 Suppl):S11–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson-White S, Conroy B, Slavish KH, Rosenzweig M (2010) Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs 33(2):127–40, Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wells KJ, Meade CD, Calcano E, Lee JH, Rivers D, Roetzheim RG (2011) Innovative approaches to reducing cancer health disparities: the Moffitt Cancer Center Patient Navigator Research Program. J Cancer Educ 26(4):649–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jean-Pierre P, Hendren SK, Fiscella K, Loader S, Rousseau S, Schwartzbauer B, Sanders M, Carroll J, Epstein R (2011) Understanding processes and domains of patient navigation for cancer care: perspectives of patient navigators from the field. J Cancer Educ 26(1):111–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiscella K, Ransom S, Jean-Pierre P, Cella D, Stein K, Bauer JE, Crane-Okada R, Gentry S, Canosa R, Smith T, Sellers J, Jankowksi E, Walsh K (2011) Patient-reported outcome measures suitable to assessment of patient navigation. Cancer 117(S15):3630–3617. doi:10.1002/cncr.26260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman HP, Rodriguez RL (2011) History and principles of patient navigation. Cancer 117(15 Suppl):3539–42. doi:10.1002/cncr.26262. Review

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Natale-Pereira A, Enard KR, Nevarez L, Jones LA (2011) The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparities. Cancer 117(15 Suppl):3543–52. doi:10.1002/cncr.26264. Review

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lasser KE, Murillo J, Lisboa S, Casimir AN, Valley-Shah L, Emmons KM, Fletcher RH, Ayanian JZ (2011) Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 171(10):906–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Calhoun EA, Whitley EM, Esparza A, Ness E, Greene A, Garcia R, Valverde PA (2010) A national patient navigator training program. Health Promot Pract 11(2):205–15, Epub 2008 Dec 30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petereit DG, Molloy K, Reiner ML, Helbig P, Cina K, Miner R, Spotted Tail C, Rost C, Conroy P, Roberts CR (2008) Establishing a patient navigator program to reduce cancer disparities in the American Indian communities of Western South Dakota: initial observations and results. Cancer Control 15(3):254–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paskett ED, Harrop JP, Wells KJ (2011) Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science. CA Cancer J Clin 61(4):237–49. doi:10.3322/caac.20111, Epub 2011 Jun 9. Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hede K (2006) Agencies look to patient navigators to reduce cancer care disparities. J Nat Cancer Inst 98(3):157–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Freund KM, Battaglia TA, Calhoun E, Dudley DJ, Fiscella K, Paskett E, Raich PC, Roetzheim RG, Patient Navigation Research Program Group (2008) National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures. Cancer 113(12):3391–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carroll JK, Humiston SG, Meldrum SC, Salamone CM, Jean-Pierre P, Epstein RM, Fiscella K (2009) Patients’ experiences with navigation for cancer care. Patient Educ Counsel 80(2):241–247. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Freund et al (2010) The NCI patient navigation research program methods, protocol and measures. Cancer 113(12):3391–3399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schoenfelder T, Klewer J, Kugler J (2010) Factors associated with patient satisfaction in surgery: the role of patients’ perceptions of received care, visit characteristics, and demographic variables. J Surg Res 164(1):e53–9, Epub 2010 Sep 16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC, Post D, Wells KJ, McKoy JM, Battaglia T, Simon M, Kilbourn K, Taylor E, Roetzheim RG, Patierno SR, Dudley DJ, Raich PC, Freund KM (2011) Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study. Psychooncology 21(9):986–992. doi:10.1002/PON.2002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Freund KM, Clark J, Darnell J, Holden A, Post D, Patierno SR, Winters PC, Patient Navigation Research Program Group (2011) Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study. Cancer 117(4):854–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. DeNavas-Walt C, Cleveland RW, Webster Jr BH (2002) Income in the United States: 2002—Current Population Reports. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Issued September 2003

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Pascal Jean-Pierre wishes to acknowledge the support of the Walther Cancer Foundation. This study was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (3U01CA116924-03S1, U01 CA116924 01, 1R25CA10261801A1, U01CA116892, U01CA117281, U01CA116903, U01CA116937, U01CA116885, U01CA116875, and U01CA116925) and the American Cancer Society (SIRSG-05-253-01).

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial disclosures to make. No conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Jean-Pierre.

Additional information

The Patient Navigation Research Program Group consists of Steven R. Patierno, PhD, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Richard G. Roetzheim, MD, MSPH, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL; Peter C. Raich, MD, FACP, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO; Electra Paskett, PhD, MPH, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Karen Freund, MD, MPH, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA; Donald J. Dudley, MD, and Jennifer Quinlan, MPH; University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Steve Rosen, MD, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jean-Pierre, P., Winters, P.C., Clark, J.A. et al. Do Better-Rated Navigators Improve Patient Satisfaction with Cancer-Related Care?. J Canc Educ 28, 527–534 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0498-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0498-5

Keywords

Navigation