Skip to main content
Log in

The importance and value of EQA for diagnostic genetic laboratories

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality control in a laboratory setting requires the establishment of effective training, standard operating procedures, internal quality control, validation of tests and external quality assessment (EQA). A structured quality management system subject to regular internal and external audits will minimise the error rate. EQA, therefore, gives assurance, both to patients and referring clinicians, that the diagnostic laboratory is competent to produce results that are reliable and accurate. EQA is educational and aims to improve and validate the overall quality of genetic service to the user. Regular EQA assessment compares laboratory performance against set standards and also allows comparison between laboratories. Sometimes EQA can also help to define good standards (best practice), although this does depend on the type of EQA test. EQA interprets best practice standards (=quality) into a numerical score (=quantity). While international bodies or professional organisations set these standards, EQA is able to assess whether these standards are met, with any omissions resulting in a reduction in the total score. Although EQA has an educational role rather than a punitive role, critical errors affecting clinical management will result in a laboratory receiving a poor performance categorisation. Accurate analysis and interpretation are essential quality parameters that require extensive knowledge of the aetiology of genetic abnormalities/disease and risk factors. Training of staff in interpretation of the results together with a comprehensive means of reporting normal and abnormal genetic results underpins the diagnostic service to the patient. Poor-performing laboratories are, therefore, encouraged to review their internal processes. EQA schemes that have been established for many years have seen improvements in the analytical and reporting content over time, thereby improving the quality of diagnostic service available to patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American College of Medical Genetics (1999) ACMG standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories, 2nd edn. American College of Medical Genetics, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Clinical Cytogenetics (2007) Professional guidelines for clinical cytogenetics. Available at http://www.cytogenetics.org.uk

  • Dequeker E, Ramsden S, Grody WW et al (2001) Quality control in molecular genetic testing. Nat Rev Genet 2:717–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elles R, Kamarainen O (2009) External quality assessment in molecular genetics. In: Kristofferson U, Schmidtke J, Cassiman JJ (eds) Quality issues in clinical genetic services. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler B, Burlina A, Kozich V, Vianey-Saban C (2008) Quality of analytical performance in inherited metabolic disorders: the role of ERNDIM. J Inherit Metab Dis 31:680–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings RJ (2009) Quality control. In: Volpi E, Bridger J (eds) FISH: methods and applications. Methods in molecular biology series, chapter 25. Humana, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings RJ, Howell R (2009) Quality in cytogenetics. In: Kristofferson U, Schmidtke J, Cassiman JJ (eds) Quality issues in clinical genetic services. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings RJ, Cavani S, Bricarelli FD et al (2006) Cytogenetic guidelines and quality assurance: a common European framework for quality assessment for constitutional and acquired cytogenetic investigations. ECA Newsletter 17:13–32, Available at http://www.biologia.uniba.it/eca and http://www.eurogentest.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings RJ, Cavani S, Bricarelli FD et al (2007) Cytogenetic guidelines and quality assurance: a common European framework for quality assessment for constitutional and acquired cytogenetic investigations. Eur J Hum Genet 15:525–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings RJ, Maher EJ, Quellhorst-Pawley B, Howell RT (2008) An internet-based external quality assessment (EQA) in cytogenetics that audits a laboratory's analytical and interpretative performance. Eur J Hum Genet 16:1217–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell R, Hastings RJ (2006) The current scope of cytogenetics external quality assessment schemes and key recommendations for harmonization of external quality assessment in Europe. Available at http://www.eurogentest.org/

  • ISCN (2009) In: Shaffer LG, Slovak ML, Campbell LJ (eds) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 15189 (2003) Medical laboratories—particular requirements for quality and competence. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development/technical_committees/list_of_iso_technical_committees.htm

  • ISO/IEC Guide 43-1 (1997) Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons—part 1: development and operation of proficiency testing schemes. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue

  • McGovern MM, Benach M, Wallenstein S et al (2003) Personnel standards and quality assurance practices of biochemical genetic testing laboratories in the United States. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127:71–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) Quality assurance and proficiency testing for molecular genetic testing: survey of 18 OECD member countries. Available at http://www.oecd.org/sti/biotechnology/

  • OECD (2007) OECD guidelines for Quality assurance in molecular genetic testing. Available at http://www.oecd.org/sti/biotechnology/

  • Reinhold U, Hennig E, Leiblein S et al (2003) FISH for BCR-ABL on interphases of peripheral blood neutrophils but not of unselected white cells correlates with bone marrow cytogenetics in CML patients treated with imatinib. Leukemia 17:1925–1929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Zardo L, Plebani M (2001) External quality assessment schemes: need for recognised requirements. Clin Chim Acta 309:183–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Rob Elles and Brian Fowler their input and revisions to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ros J. Hastings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hastings, R.J., Howell, R.T. The importance and value of EQA for diagnostic genetic laboratories. J Community Genet 1, 11–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-010-0009-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-010-0009-x

Keywords

Navigation