Abstract
Quality control in a laboratory setting requires the establishment of effective training, standard operating procedures, internal quality control, validation of tests and external quality assessment (EQA). A structured quality management system subject to regular internal and external audits will minimise the error rate. EQA, therefore, gives assurance, both to patients and referring clinicians, that the diagnostic laboratory is competent to produce results that are reliable and accurate. EQA is educational and aims to improve and validate the overall quality of genetic service to the user. Regular EQA assessment compares laboratory performance against set standards and also allows comparison between laboratories. Sometimes EQA can also help to define good standards (best practice), although this does depend on the type of EQA test. EQA interprets best practice standards (=quality) into a numerical score (=quantity). While international bodies or professional organisations set these standards, EQA is able to assess whether these standards are met, with any omissions resulting in a reduction in the total score. Although EQA has an educational role rather than a punitive role, critical errors affecting clinical management will result in a laboratory receiving a poor performance categorisation. Accurate analysis and interpretation are essential quality parameters that require extensive knowledge of the aetiology of genetic abnormalities/disease and risk factors. Training of staff in interpretation of the results together with a comprehensive means of reporting normal and abnormal genetic results underpins the diagnostic service to the patient. Poor-performing laboratories are, therefore, encouraged to review their internal processes. EQA schemes that have been established for many years have seen improvements in the analytical and reporting content over time, thereby improving the quality of diagnostic service available to patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American College of Medical Genetics (1999) ACMG standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories, 2nd edn. American College of Medical Genetics, Bethesda
Association for Clinical Cytogenetics (2007) Professional guidelines for clinical cytogenetics. Available at http://www.cytogenetics.org.uk
Dequeker E, Ramsden S, Grody WW et al (2001) Quality control in molecular genetic testing. Nat Rev Genet 2:717–723
Elles R, Kamarainen O (2009) External quality assessment in molecular genetics. In: Kristofferson U, Schmidtke J, Cassiman JJ (eds) Quality issues in clinical genetic services. Springer, Heidelberg
Fowler B, Burlina A, Kozich V, Vianey-Saban C (2008) Quality of analytical performance in inherited metabolic disorders: the role of ERNDIM. J Inherit Metab Dis 31:680–689
Hastings RJ (2009) Quality control. In: Volpi E, Bridger J (eds) FISH: methods and applications. Methods in molecular biology series, chapter 25. Humana, New Jersey
Hastings RJ, Howell R (2009) Quality in cytogenetics. In: Kristofferson U, Schmidtke J, Cassiman JJ (eds) Quality issues in clinical genetic services. Springer, Heidelberg
Hastings RJ, Cavani S, Bricarelli FD et al (2006) Cytogenetic guidelines and quality assurance: a common European framework for quality assessment for constitutional and acquired cytogenetic investigations. ECA Newsletter 17:13–32, Available at http://www.biologia.uniba.it/eca and http://www.eurogentest.org/
Hastings RJ, Cavani S, Bricarelli FD et al (2007) Cytogenetic guidelines and quality assurance: a common European framework for quality assessment for constitutional and acquired cytogenetic investigations. Eur J Hum Genet 15:525–527
Hastings RJ, Maher EJ, Quellhorst-Pawley B, Howell RT (2008) An internet-based external quality assessment (EQA) in cytogenetics that audits a laboratory's analytical and interpretative performance. Eur J Hum Genet 16:1217–1224
Howell R, Hastings RJ (2006) The current scope of cytogenetics external quality assessment schemes and key recommendations for harmonization of external quality assessment in Europe. Available at http://www.eurogentest.org/
ISCN (2009) In: Shaffer LG, Slovak ML, Campbell LJ (eds) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Karger, Basel
ISO 15189 (2003) Medical laboratories—particular requirements for quality and competence. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development/technical_committees/list_of_iso_technical_committees.htm
ISO/IEC Guide 43-1 (1997) Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons—part 1: development and operation of proficiency testing schemes. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue
McGovern MM, Benach M, Wallenstein S et al (2003) Personnel standards and quality assurance practices of biochemical genetic testing laboratories in the United States. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127:71–76
OECD (2005) Quality assurance and proficiency testing for molecular genetic testing: survey of 18 OECD member countries. Available at http://www.oecd.org/sti/biotechnology/
OECD (2007) OECD guidelines for Quality assurance in molecular genetic testing. Available at http://www.oecd.org/sti/biotechnology/
Reinhold U, Hennig E, Leiblein S et al (2003) FISH for BCR-ABL on interphases of peripheral blood neutrophils but not of unselected white cells correlates with bone marrow cytogenetics in CML patients treated with imatinib. Leukemia 17:1925–1929
Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Zardo L, Plebani M (2001) External quality assessment schemes: need for recognised requirements. Clin Chim Acta 309:183–199
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Rob Elles and Brian Fowler their input and revisions to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hastings, R.J., Howell, R.T. The importance and value of EQA for diagnostic genetic laboratories. J Community Genet 1, 11–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-010-0009-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-010-0009-x