Skip to main content
Log in

On Sampling, Evidence and Theory: Concluding Remarks on the Distancing Debate

  • Published:
Contemporary Jewry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a summary and discussion of articles contributed to Contemporary Jewry's special issue (vol 30, issues 2/3) on trends in American Jewish attachment to Israel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The AJC has completed two new surveys during the gestation period for this special issue, and the trend for the “close to Israel” question has been upward. In 2009, 69% of respondents reported feeling close to Israel, up 2% from the previous year. In 2010, 74% reported feeling close to Israel. The downward slide noted in our original paper therefore reversed, and the 2010 level is near the 20-year high.

  2. Protestants, Catholics and Jews were identified with a question about religious preference. Two survey years were combined and samples were weighted. The difference between Jews, Protestants and Catholics is statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Analysis by Kadushin.

  3. Sixty-five percent of NJPS respondents were Jewish-by-religion; 12% were of Jewish origin but professed no religion (Perlmann 2009, Table 3). As noted, 36% of the no religion group—or 4% of all respondents—self identified as Jewish “for any reason.” Therefore, self-identifying Jews of no religion comprise 6% of the total Jewish population [4/(65+4)], when the latter is defined to include Jews-by- religion plus individuals of Jewish origin who profess no religion but self-identify as Jewish.

References

  • Cohen, Steven M., and Arnold M. Eisen. 2000. The Jew within. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Steven M., and Ari Y. Kelman. 2007. Beyond distancing: Young adult American Jews and their alienation from Israel. New York: Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Steven M., and Jack Wertheimer. 2006. Whatever happened to the Jewish people? Commentary 121: 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, James Allan, and Tom W. Smith. 2009. General social surveys, 19722008 [machine-readable data file]/Principal Investigator, James A. Davis; Director and Co-Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigator, Peter V. Marsden; Sponsored by National Science Foundation. NORC ed. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center [producer]; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut [distributor].

  • Koren, Annette, and Emily Einhorn. 2010. Searching for the study of Israel: A report on the teaching of Israel on U.S. College Campuses 2008–09. Waltham, MA: Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.Wright. 1959. The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmann, Joel. 2009. Secularists and those of no religion: ‘It’s the sociology, stupid (not the theology). Contemporary Jewry 29.

  • Rosenthal, Steven. 2001. Irreconcilable differences. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, Theodore. 2009. The new realism: American Jewish views about Israel. New York: American Jewish Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, Theodore. 2010. Mass mobilization to direct engagement: American Jews’ changing relationship to Israel. Israel Studies 15(2): 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, Theodore, and Ephraim Tabory. 2010. Converging political cultures: How globalization is shaping the discourses of Israeli and American Jews. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 16: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, Theodore, David Mittelberg, Shahar Hecht, and Leonard Saxe. 2010. Guest-host encounters in diaspora-heritage tourism: The Taglit-Birthright Israel Mifgash. Diaspora, Indigenous and Minority Education: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, Leonard, and Barry Chazan. 2008. Ten days of Birthright Israel. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, Leonard, Elizabeth Tighe, Benjamin Phillips, and Charles Kadushin. 2007. Reconsidering the size and characteristics of the American Jewish population. Waltham, MA: Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliktar, Ofira. 2002. Divided we stand: America Jews, Israel, and the peace process. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Jewish Communities. 2003. National Jewish population survey, 2000–2001. New York, NY: United Jewish Communities [producer]. Storrs, CT: North American Jewish Data Bank [distributor].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodore Sasson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sasson, T., Kadushin, C. & Saxe, L. On Sampling, Evidence and Theory: Concluding Remarks on the Distancing Debate. Cont Jewry 30, 149–153 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12397-010-9040-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12397-010-9040-9

Keywords

Navigation